Theorem ordtriexmid 4588

Description: Ordinal trichotomy implies the law of the excluded middle (that is, decidability of an arbitrary proposition).

This theorem is stated in "Constructive ordinals", [Crosilla], p. "Set-theoretic principles incompatible with intuitionistic logic".

Also see exmidontri 7387 which is much the same theorem but biconditionalized and using the EXMID notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 14-Nov-2018.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ordtriexmid.1	|- A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ordtriexmid	|- ( ph \/ -. ph )

Distinct variable groups:   x, y   ph, x

Allowed substitution hint:   ph( y)

Proof of Theorem ordtriexmid

Dummy variable z is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		noel 3473	. . . 4 |- -. { z e. { (/) } | ph } e. (/)
2		ordtriexmidlem 4586	. . . . . 6 |- { z e. { (/) } | ph } e. On
3		eleq1 2270	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( x = { z e. { (/) } | ph } -> ( x e. (/) <-> { z e. { (/) } | ph } e. (/) ) )
4		eqeq1 2214	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( x = { z e. { (/) } | ph } -> ( x = (/) <-> { z e. { (/) } | ph } = (/) ) )
5		eleq2 2271	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( x = { z e. { (/) } | ph } -> ( (/) e. x <-> (/) e. { z e. { (/) } | ph } ) )
6	3, 4, 5	3orbi123d 1324	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x = { z e. { (/) } | ph } -> ( ( x e. (/) \/ x = (/) \/ (/) e. x ) <-> ( { z e. { (/) } | ph } e. (/) \/ { z e. { (/) } | ph } = (/) \/ (/) e. { z e. { (/) } | ph } ) ) )
7		0elon 4458	. . . . . . . 8 |- (/) e. On
8		0ex 4188	. . . . . . . . 9 |- (/) e. _V
9		eleq1 2270	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- ( y = (/) -> ( y e. On <-> (/) e. On ) )
10	9	anbi2d 464	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( y = (/) -> ( ( x e. On /\ y e. On ) <-> ( x e. On /\ (/) e. On ) ) )
11		eleq2 2271	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- ( y = (/) -> ( x e. y <-> x e. (/) ) )
12		eqeq2 2217	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- ( y = (/) -> ( x = y <-> x = (/) ) )
13		eleq1 2270	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- ( y = (/) -> ( y e. x <-> (/) e. x ) )
14	11, 12, 13	3orbi123d 1324	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( y = (/) -> ( ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x ) <-> ( x e. (/) \/ x = (/) \/ (/) e. x ) ) )
15	10, 14	imbi12d 234	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( y = (/) -> ( ( ( x e. On /\ y e. On ) -> ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x ) ) <-> ( ( x e. On /\ (/) e. On ) -> ( x e. (/) \/ x = (/) \/ (/) e. x ) ) ) )
16		ordtriexmid.1	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x )
17	16	rspec2 2597	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( ( x e. On /\ y e. On ) -> ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x ) )
18	8, 15, 17	vtocl 2833	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( ( x e. On /\ (/) e. On ) -> ( x e. (/) \/ x = (/) \/ (/) e. x ) )
19	7, 18	mpan2 425	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x e. On -> ( x e. (/) \/ x = (/) \/ (/) e. x ) )
20	6, 19	vtoclga 2845	. . . . . 6 |- ( { z e. { (/) } | ph } e. On -> ( { z e. { (/) } | ph } e. (/) \/ { z e. { (/) } | ph } = (/) \/ (/) e. { z e. { (/) } | ph } ) )
21	2, 20	ax-mp 5	. . . . 5 |- ( { z e. { (/) } | ph } e. (/) \/ { z e. { (/) } | ph } = (/) \/ (/) e. { z e. { (/) } | ph } )
22		3orass 984	. . . . 5 |- ( ( { z e. { (/) } | ph } e. (/) \/ { z e. { (/) } | ph } = (/) \/ (/) e. { z e. { (/) } | ph } ) <-> ( { z e. { (/) } | ph } e. (/) \/ ( { z e. { (/) } | ph } = (/) \/ (/) e. { z e. { (/) } | ph } ) ) )
23	21, 22	mpbi 145	. . . 4 |- ( { z e. { (/) } | ph } e. (/) \/ ( { z e. { (/) } | ph } = (/) \/ (/) e. { z e. { (/) } | ph } ) )
24	1, 23	mtpor 1445	. . 3 |- ( { z e. { (/) } | ph } = (/) \/ (/) e. { z e. { (/) } | ph } )
25		ordtriexmidlem2 4587	. . . 4 |- ( { z e. { (/) } | ph } = (/) -> -. ph )
26	8	snid 3675	. . . . . 6 |- (/) e. { (/) }
27		biidd 172	. . . . . . 7 |- ( z = (/) -> ( ph <-> ph ) )
28	27	elrab3 2938	. . . . . 6 |- ( (/) e. { (/) } -> ( (/) e. { z e. { (/) } | ph } <-> ph ) )
29	26, 28	ax-mp 5	. . . . 5 |- ( (/) e. { z e. { (/) } | ph } <-> ph )
30	29	biimpi 120	. . . 4 |- ( (/) e. { z e. { (/) } | ph } -> ph )
31	25, 30	orim12i 761	. . 3 |- ( ( { z e. { (/) } | ph } = (/) \/ (/) e. { z e. { (/) } | ph } ) -> ( -. ph \/ ph ) )
32	24, 31	ax-mp 5	. 2 |- ( -. ph \/ ph )
33		orcom 730	. 2 |- ( ( ph \/ -. ph ) <-> ( -. ph \/ ph ) )
34	32, 33	mpbir 146	1 |- ( ph \/ -. ph )

Syntax hints:   -. wn 3   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105   \/ wo 710   \/ w3o 980   = wceq 1373   e. wcel 2178   A.wral 2486   {crab 2490   (/)c0 3469   {csn 3644   Oncon0 4429

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 711  ax-5 1471  ax-7 1472  ax-gen 1473  ax-ie1 1517  ax-ie2 1518  ax-8 1528  ax-10 1529  ax-11 1530  ax-i12 1531  ax-bndl 1533  ax-4 1534  ax-17 1550  ax-i9 1554  ax-ial 1558  ax-i5r 1559  ax-14 2181  ax-ext 2189  ax-sep 4179  ax-nul 4187  ax-pow 4235

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3or 982  df-3an 983  df-tru 1376  df-nf 1485  df-sb 1787  df-clab 2194  df-cleq 2200  df-clel 2203  df-nfc 2339  df-ral 2491  df-rex 2492  df-rab 2495  df-v 2779  df-dif 3177  df-un 3179  df-in 3181  df-ss 3188  df-nul 3470  df-pw 3629  df-sn 3650  df-uni 3866  df-tr 4160  df-iord 4432  df-on 4434  df-suc 4437

This theorem is referenced by: (None)