Theorem swoord2 6582

Description: The incomparability equivalence relation is compatible with the original order. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Dec-2014.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
swoer.1	|- R = ( ( X X. X ) \ ( .< u. `' .< ) )
swoer.2	|- ( ( ph /\ ( y e. X /\ z e. X ) ) -> ( y .< z -> -. z .< y ) )
swoer.3	|- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. X /\ y e. X /\ z e. X ) ) -> ( x .< y -> ( x .< z \/ z .< y ) ) )
swoord.4	|- ( ph -> B e. X )
swoord.5	|- ( ph -> C e. X )
swoord.6	|- ( ph -> A R B )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
swoord2	|- ( ph -> ( C .< A <-> C .< B ) )

Distinct variable groups:   x, y, z, .<   x, A, y, z   x, B, y, z   x, C, y, z   ph, x, y, z   x, X, y, z

Allowed substitution hints:   R( x, y, z)

Proof of Theorem swoord2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		id 19	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ph )
2		swoord.5	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> C e. X )
3		swoord.6	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> A R B )
4		swoer.1	. . . . . . 7 |- R = ( ( X X. X ) \ ( .< u. `' .< ) )
5		difss 3275	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( X X. X ) \ ( .< u. `' .< ) ) C_ ( X X. X )
6	4, 5	eqsstri 3201	. . . . . 6 |- R C_ ( X X. X )
7	6	ssbri 4061	. . . . 5 |- ( A R B -> A ( X X. X ) B )
8		df-br 4018	. . . . . 6 |- ( A ( X X. X ) B <-> <. A , B >. e. ( X X. X ) )
9		opelxp1 4674	. . . . . 6 |- ( <. A , B >. e. ( X X. X ) -> A e. X )
10	8, 9	sylbi 121	. . . . 5 |- ( A ( X X. X ) B -> A e. X )
11	3, 7, 10	3syl 17	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> A e. X )
12		swoord.4	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> B e. X )
13		swoer.3	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. X /\ y e. X /\ z e. X ) ) -> ( x .< y -> ( x .< z \/ z .< y ) ) )
14	13	swopolem 4319	. . . 4 |- ( ( ph /\ ( C e. X /\ A e. X /\ B e. X ) ) -> ( C .< A -> ( C .< B \/ B .< A ) ) )
15	1, 2, 11, 12, 14	syl13anc 1250	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( C .< A -> ( C .< B \/ B .< A ) ) )
16		idd 21	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( C .< B -> C .< B ) )
17	4	brdifun 6579	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( ( A e. X /\ B e. X ) -> ( A R B <-> -. ( A .< B \/ B .< A ) ) )
18	11, 12, 17	syl2anc 411	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ph -> ( A R B <-> -. ( A .< B \/ B .< A ) ) )
19	3, 18	mpbid 147	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> -. ( A .< B \/ B .< A ) )
20		olc 712	. . . . . 6 |- ( B .< A -> ( A .< B \/ B .< A ) )
21	19, 20	nsyl 629	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> -. B .< A )
22	21	pm2.21d 620	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( B .< A -> C .< B ) )
23	16, 22	jaod 718	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( ( C .< B \/ B .< A ) -> C .< B ) )
24	15, 23	syld 45	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( C .< A -> C .< B ) )
25	13	swopolem 4319	. . . 4 |- ( ( ph /\ ( C e. X /\ B e. X /\ A e. X ) ) -> ( C .< B -> ( C .< A \/ A .< B ) ) )
26	1, 2, 12, 11, 25	syl13anc 1250	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( C .< B -> ( C .< A \/ A .< B ) ) )
27		idd 21	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( C .< A -> C .< A ) )
28		orc 713	. . . . . 6 |- ( A .< B -> ( A .< B \/ B .< A ) )
29	19, 28	nsyl 629	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> -. A .< B )
30	29	pm2.21d 620	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( A .< B -> C .< A ) )
31	27, 30	jaod 718	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( ( C .< A \/ A .< B ) -> C .< A ) )
32	26, 31	syld 45	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( C .< B -> C .< A ) )
33	24, 32	impbid 129	1 |- ( ph -> ( C .< A <-> C .< B ) )

Syntax hints:   -. wn 3   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105   \/ wo 709   /\ w3a 979   = wceq 1363   e. wcel 2159   \ cdif 3140   u. cun 3141   <.cop 3609   class class class wbr 4017   X. cxp 4638   `'ccnv 4639

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 710  ax-5 1457  ax-7 1458  ax-gen 1459  ax-ie1 1503  ax-ie2 1504  ax-8 1514  ax-10 1515  ax-11 1516  ax-i12 1517  ax-bndl 1519  ax-4 1520  ax-17 1536  ax-i9 1540  ax-ial 1544  ax-i5r 1545  ax-14 2162  ax-ext 2170  ax-sep 4135  ax-pow 4188  ax-pr 4223

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 981  df-tru 1366  df-nf 1471  df-sb 1773  df-eu 2040  df-mo 2041  df-clab 2175  df-cleq 2181  df-clel 2184  df-nfc 2320  df-ral 2472  df-rex 2473  df-v 2753  df-dif 3145  df-un 3147  df-in 3149  df-ss 3156  df-pw 3591  df-sn 3612  df-pr 3613  df-op 3615  df-br 4018  df-opab 4079  df-xp 4646  df-cnv 4648

This theorem is referenced by: (None)