ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  undifexmid Unicode version

Theorem undifexmid 4283
Description: Union of complementary parts producing the whole and excluded middle. Although special cases such as undifss 3575 and undifdcss 7114 are provable, the full statement implies excluded middle as shown here. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jun-2022.)
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
undifexmid.1  |-  ( x 
C_  y  <->  ( x  u.  ( y  \  x
) )  =  y )
Assertion
Ref Expression
undifexmid  |-  ( ph  \/  -.  ph )
Distinct variable group:    ph, x, y

Proof of Theorem undifexmid
Dummy variable  z is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 0ex 4216 . . . . 5  |-  (/)  e.  _V
21snid 3700 . . . 4  |-  (/)  e.  { (/)
}
3 ssrab2 3312 . . . . 5  |-  { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph }  C_  { (/) }
4 p0ex 4278 . . . . . . 7  |-  { (/) }  e.  _V
54rabex 4234 . . . . . 6  |-  { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph }  e.  _V
6 sseq12 3252 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( ( x  =  { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph }  /\  y  =  { (/) } )  -> 
( x  C_  y  <->  { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph }  C_  {
(/) } ) )
7 simpl 109 . . . . . . . . 9  |-  ( ( x  =  { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph }  /\  y  =  { (/) } )  ->  x  =  { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph } )
8 simpr 110 . . . . . . . . . 10  |-  ( ( x  =  { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph }  /\  y  =  { (/) } )  -> 
y  =  { (/) } )
98, 7difeq12d 3326 . . . . . . . . 9  |-  ( ( x  =  { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph }  /\  y  =  { (/) } )  -> 
( y  \  x
)  =  ( {
(/) }  \  { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph } ) )
107, 9uneq12d 3362 . . . . . . . 8  |-  ( ( x  =  { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph }  /\  y  =  { (/) } )  -> 
( x  u.  (
y  \  x )
)  =  ( { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph }  u.  ( { (/) }  \  {
z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph } ) ) )
1110, 8eqeq12d 2246 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( ( x  =  { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph }  /\  y  =  { (/) } )  -> 
( ( x  u.  ( y  \  x
) )  =  y  <-> 
( { z  e. 
{ (/) }  |  ph }  u.  ( { (/)
}  \  { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph } ) )  =  { (/) } ) )
126, 11bibi12d 235 . . . . . 6  |-  ( ( x  =  { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph }  /\  y  =  { (/) } )  -> 
( ( x  C_  y 
<->  ( x  u.  (
y  \  x )
)  =  y )  <-> 
( { z  e. 
{ (/) }  |  ph }  C_  { (/) }  <->  ( {
z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph }  u.  ( { (/) }  \  {
z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph } ) )  =  { (/) } ) ) )
13 undifexmid.1 . . . . . 6  |-  ( x 
C_  y  <->  ( x  u.  ( y  \  x
) )  =  y )
145, 4, 12, 13vtocl2 2859 . . . . 5  |-  ( { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph }  C_  {
(/) }  <->  ( { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph }  u.  ( {
(/) }  \  { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph } ) )  =  { (/) } )
153, 14mpbi 145 . . . 4  |-  ( { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph }  u.  ( { (/) }  \  {
z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph } ) )  =  { (/) }
162, 15eleqtrri 2307 . . 3  |-  (/)  e.  ( { z  e.  { (/)
}  |  ph }  u.  ( { (/) }  \  { z  e.  { (/)
}  |  ph }
) )
17 elun 3348 . . 3  |-  ( (/)  e.  ( { z  e. 
{ (/) }  |  ph }  u.  ( { (/)
}  \  { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph } ) )  <->  ( (/)  e.  {
z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph }  \/  (/) 
e.  ( { (/) } 
\  { z  e. 
{ (/) }  |  ph } ) ) )
1816, 17mpbi 145 . 2  |-  ( (/)  e.  { z  e.  { (/)
}  |  ph }  \/  (/)  e.  ( {
(/) }  \  { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph } ) )
19 biidd 172 . . . . . 6  |-  ( z  =  (/)  ->  ( ph  <->  ph ) )
2019elrab3 2963 . . . . 5  |-  ( (/)  e.  { (/) }  ->  ( (/) 
e.  { z  e. 
{ (/) }  |  ph } 
<-> 
ph ) )
212, 20ax-mp 5 . . . 4  |-  ( (/)  e.  { z  e.  { (/)
}  |  ph }  <->  ph )
2221biimpi 120 . . 3  |-  ( (/)  e.  { z  e.  { (/)
}  |  ph }  ->  ph )
23 eldifn 3330 . . . 4  |-  ( (/)  e.  ( { (/) }  \  { z  e.  { (/)
}  |  ph }
)  ->  -.  (/)  e.  {
z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph } )
2423, 21sylnib 682 . . 3  |-  ( (/)  e.  ( { (/) }  \  { z  e.  { (/)
}  |  ph }
)  ->  -.  ph )
2522, 24orim12i 766 . 2  |-  ( (
(/)  e.  { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph }  \/  (/)  e.  ( { (/) }  \  {
z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph } ) )  ->  ( ph  \/  -.  ph ) )
2618, 25ax-mp 5 1  |-  ( ph  \/  -.  ph )
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   -. wn 3    /\ wa 104    <-> wb 105    \/ wo 715    = wceq 1397    e. wcel 2202   {crab 2514    \ cdif 3197    u. cun 3198    C_ wss 3200   (/)c0 3494   {csn 3669
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-io 716  ax-5 1495  ax-7 1496  ax-gen 1497  ax-ie1 1541  ax-ie2 1542  ax-8 1552  ax-10 1553  ax-11 1554  ax-i12 1555  ax-bndl 1557  ax-4 1558  ax-17 1574  ax-i9 1578  ax-ial 1582  ax-i5r 1583  ax-14 2205  ax-ext 2213  ax-sep 4207  ax-nul 4215  ax-pow 4264
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1400  df-nf 1509  df-sb 1811  df-clab 2218  df-cleq 2224  df-clel 2227  df-nfc 2363  df-ral 2515  df-rab 2519  df-v 2804  df-dif 3202  df-un 3204  df-in 3206  df-ss 3213  df-nul 3495  df-pw 3654  df-sn 3675
This theorem is referenced by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator