ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  undifexmid Unicode version

Theorem undifexmid 4289
Description: Union of complementary parts producing the whole and excluded middle. Although special cases such as undifss 3577 and undifdcss 7158 are provable, the full statement implies excluded middle as shown here. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jun-2022.)
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
undifexmid.1  |-  ( x 
C_  y  <->  ( x  u.  ( y  \  x
) )  =  y )
Assertion
Ref Expression
undifexmid  |-  ( ph  \/  -.  ph )
Distinct variable group:    ph, x, y

Proof of Theorem undifexmid
Dummy variable  z is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 0ex 4221 . . . . 5  |-  (/)  e.  _V
21snid 3704 . . . 4  |-  (/)  e.  { (/)
}
3 ssrab2 3313 . . . . 5  |-  { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph }  C_  { (/) }
4 p0ex 4284 . . . . . . 7  |-  { (/) }  e.  _V
54rabex 4239 . . . . . 6  |-  { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph }  e.  _V
6 sseq12 3253 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( ( x  =  { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph }  /\  y  =  { (/) } )  -> 
( x  C_  y  <->  { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph }  C_  {
(/) } ) )
7 simpl 109 . . . . . . . . 9  |-  ( ( x  =  { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph }  /\  y  =  { (/) } )  ->  x  =  { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph } )
8 simpr 110 . . . . . . . . . 10  |-  ( ( x  =  { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph }  /\  y  =  { (/) } )  -> 
y  =  { (/) } )
98, 7difeq12d 3328 . . . . . . . . 9  |-  ( ( x  =  { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph }  /\  y  =  { (/) } )  -> 
( y  \  x
)  =  ( {
(/) }  \  { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph } ) )
107, 9uneq12d 3364 . . . . . . . 8  |-  ( ( x  =  { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph }  /\  y  =  { (/) } )  -> 
( x  u.  (
y  \  x )
)  =  ( { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph }  u.  ( { (/) }  \  {
z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph } ) ) )
1110, 8eqeq12d 2246 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( ( x  =  { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph }  /\  y  =  { (/) } )  -> 
( ( x  u.  ( y  \  x
) )  =  y  <-> 
( { z  e. 
{ (/) }  |  ph }  u.  ( { (/)
}  \  { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph } ) )  =  { (/) } ) )
126, 11bibi12d 235 . . . . . 6  |-  ( ( x  =  { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph }  /\  y  =  { (/) } )  -> 
( ( x  C_  y 
<->  ( x  u.  (
y  \  x )
)  =  y )  <-> 
( { z  e. 
{ (/) }  |  ph }  C_  { (/) }  <->  ( {
z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph }  u.  ( { (/) }  \  {
z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph } ) )  =  { (/) } ) ) )
13 undifexmid.1 . . . . . 6  |-  ( x 
C_  y  <->  ( x  u.  ( y  \  x
) )  =  y )
145, 4, 12, 13vtocl2 2860 . . . . 5  |-  ( { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph }  C_  {
(/) }  <->  ( { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph }  u.  ( {
(/) }  \  { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph } ) )  =  { (/) } )
153, 14mpbi 145 . . . 4  |-  ( { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph }  u.  ( { (/) }  \  {
z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph } ) )  =  { (/) }
162, 15eleqtrri 2307 . . 3  |-  (/)  e.  ( { z  e.  { (/)
}  |  ph }  u.  ( { (/) }  \  { z  e.  { (/)
}  |  ph }
) )
17 elun 3350 . . 3  |-  ( (/)  e.  ( { z  e. 
{ (/) }  |  ph }  u.  ( { (/)
}  \  { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph } ) )  <->  ( (/)  e.  {
z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph }  \/  (/) 
e.  ( { (/) } 
\  { z  e. 
{ (/) }  |  ph } ) ) )
1816, 17mpbi 145 . 2  |-  ( (/)  e.  { z  e.  { (/)
}  |  ph }  \/  (/)  e.  ( {
(/) }  \  { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph } ) )
19 biidd 172 . . . . . 6  |-  ( z  =  (/)  ->  ( ph  <->  ph ) )
2019elrab3 2964 . . . . 5  |-  ( (/)  e.  { (/) }  ->  ( (/) 
e.  { z  e. 
{ (/) }  |  ph } 
<-> 
ph ) )
212, 20ax-mp 5 . . . 4  |-  ( (/)  e.  { z  e.  { (/)
}  |  ph }  <->  ph )
2221biimpi 120 . . 3  |-  ( (/)  e.  { z  e.  { (/)
}  |  ph }  ->  ph )
23 eldifn 3332 . . . 4  |-  ( (/)  e.  ( { (/) }  \  { z  e.  { (/)
}  |  ph }
)  ->  -.  (/)  e.  {
z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph } )
2423, 21sylnib 683 . . 3  |-  ( (/)  e.  ( { (/) }  \  { z  e.  { (/)
}  |  ph }
)  ->  -.  ph )
2522, 24orim12i 767 . 2  |-  ( (
(/)  e.  { z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph }  \/  (/)  e.  ( { (/) }  \  {
z  e.  { (/) }  |  ph } ) )  ->  ( ph  \/  -.  ph ) )
2618, 25ax-mp 5 1  |-  ( ph  \/  -.  ph )
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   -. wn 3    /\ wa 104    <-> wb 105    \/ wo 716    = wceq 1398    e. wcel 2202   {crab 2515    \ cdif 3198    u. cun 3199    C_ wss 3201   (/)c0 3496   {csn 3673
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-io 717  ax-5 1496  ax-7 1497  ax-gen 1498  ax-ie1 1542  ax-ie2 1543  ax-8 1553  ax-10 1554  ax-11 1555  ax-i12 1556  ax-bndl 1558  ax-4 1559  ax-17 1575  ax-i9 1579  ax-ial 1583  ax-i5r 1584  ax-14 2205  ax-ext 2213  ax-sep 4212  ax-nul 4220  ax-pow 4270
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1401  df-nf 1510  df-sb 1811  df-clab 2218  df-cleq 2224  df-clel 2227  df-nfc 2364  df-ral 2516  df-rab 2520  df-v 2805  df-dif 3203  df-un 3205  df-in 3207  df-ss 3214  df-nul 3497  df-pw 3658  df-sn 3679
This theorem is referenced by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator