Theorem undifexmid 4172

Description: Union of complementary parts producing the whole and excluded middle. Although special cases such as undifss 3489 and undifdcss 6888 are provable, the full statement implies excluded middle as shown here. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jun-2022.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
undifexmid.1	⊢ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∪ (𝑦 ∖ 𝑥)) = 𝑦)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
undifexmid	⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)

Distinct variable group:   𝜑,𝑥,𝑦

Proof of Theorem undifexmid

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		0ex 4109	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
2	1	snid 3607	. . . 4 ⊢ ∅ ∈ {∅}
3		ssrab2 3227	. . . . 5 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {∅}
4		p0ex 4167	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ {∅} ∈ V
5	4	rabex 4126	. . . . . 6 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V
6		sseq12 3167	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 = {∅}) → (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {∅}))
7		simpl 108	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 = {∅}) → 𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑})
8		simpr 109	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 = {∅}) → 𝑦 = {∅})
9	8, 7	difeq12d 3241	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 = {∅}) → (𝑦 ∖ 𝑥) = ({∅} ∖ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}))
10	7, 9	uneq12d 3277	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 = {∅}) → (𝑥 ∪ (𝑦 ∖ 𝑥)) = ({𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∪ ({∅} ∖ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑})))
11	10, 8	eqeq12d 2180	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 = {∅}) → ((𝑥 ∪ (𝑦 ∖ 𝑥)) = 𝑦 ↔ ({𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∪ ({∅} ∖ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑})) = {∅}))
12	6, 11	bibi12d 234	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 = {∅}) → ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∪ (𝑦 ∖ 𝑥)) = 𝑦) ↔ ({𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {∅} ↔ ({𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∪ ({∅} ∖ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑})) = {∅})))
13		undifexmid.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∪ (𝑦 ∖ 𝑥)) = 𝑦)
14	5, 4, 12, 13	vtocl2 2781	. . . . 5 ⊢ ({𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {∅} ↔ ({𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∪ ({∅} ∖ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑})) = {∅})
15	3, 14	mpbi 144	. . . 4 ⊢ ({𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∪ ({∅} ∖ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑})) = {∅}
16	2, 15	eleqtrri 2242	. . 3 ⊢ ∅ ∈ ({𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∪ ({∅} ∖ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}))
17		elun 3263	. . 3 ⊢ (∅ ∈ ({𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∪ ({∅} ∖ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑})) ↔ (∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∨ ∅ ∈ ({∅} ∖ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑})))
18	16, 17	mpbi 144	. 2 ⊢ (∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∨ ∅ ∈ ({∅} ∖ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}))
19		biidd 171	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
20	19	elrab3 2883	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∅ ∈ {∅} → (∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑))
21	2, 20	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 ⊢ (∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑)
22	21	biimpi 119	. . 3 ⊢ (∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → 𝜑)
23		eldifn 3245	. . . 4 ⊢ (∅ ∈ ({∅} ∖ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}) → ¬ ∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑})
24	23, 21	sylnib 666	. . 3 ⊢ (∅ ∈ ({∅} ∖ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}) → ¬ 𝜑)
25	22, 24	orim12i 749	. 2 ⊢ ((∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∨ ∅ ∈ ({∅} ∖ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑})) → (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑))
26	18, 25	ax-mp 5	1 ⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ∧ wa 103   ↔ wb 104   ∨ wo 698   = wceq 1343   ∈ wcel 2136  {crab 2448   ∖ cdif 3113   ∪ cun 3114   ⊆ wss 3116  ∅c0 3409  {csn 3576

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 604  ax-in2 605  ax-io 699  ax-5 1435  ax-7 1436  ax-gen 1437  ax-ie1 1481  ax-ie2 1482  ax-8 1492  ax-10 1493  ax-11 1494  ax-i12 1495  ax-bndl 1497  ax-4 1498  ax-17 1514  ax-i9 1518  ax-ial 1522  ax-i5r 1523  ax-14 2139  ax-ext 2147  ax-sep 4100  ax-nul 4108  ax-pow 4153

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1346  df-nf 1449  df-sb 1751  df-clab 2152  df-cleq 2158  df-clel 2161  df-nfc 2297  df-ral 2449  df-rab 2453  df-v 2728  df-dif 3118  df-un 3120  df-in 3122  df-ss 3129  df-nul 3410  df-pw 3561  df-sn 3582

This theorem is referenced by: (None)