Theorem bj-inex 17099

Description: The intersection of two sets is a set, from bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-inex	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ V)

Proof of Theorem bj-inex

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elisset 2836	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴)
2		elisset 2836	. 2 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 → ∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐵)
3		ax-17 1579	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐵 → ∀𝑥∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐵)
4		19.29r 1674	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐵) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐵))
5	3, 4	sylan2 286	. . 3 ⊢ ((∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐵) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐵))
6		ax-17 1579	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ∀𝑦 𝑥 = 𝐴)
7		19.29 1673	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((∀𝑦 𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐵) → ∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵))
8	6, 7	sylan 283	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐵) → ∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵))
9	8	eximi 1653	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐵) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵))
10		ineq12 3427	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))
11	10	2eximi 1654	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))
12		dfin5 3227	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = {𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦}
13		vex 2824	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
14		ax-bdel 17013	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
15		bdcv 17040	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝑥
16	14, 15	bdrabexg 17098	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ V → {𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦} ∈ V)
17	13, 16	ax-mp 5	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦} ∈ V
18	12, 17	eqeltri 2311	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∈ V
19		eleq1 2301	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) → ((𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∈ V ↔ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ V))
20	18, 19	mpbii 148	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ V)
21	20	exlimivv 1952	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ V)
22	11, 21	syl 14	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ V)
23	5, 9, 22	3syl 17	. 2 ⊢ ((∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ V)
24	1, 2, 23	syl2an 289	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ V)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104  ∀wal 1400   = wceq 1402  ∃wex 1545   ∈ wcel 2209  {crab 2532  Vcvv 2821   ∩ cin 3219

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-ext 2220  ax-bd0 17005  ax-bdan 17007  ax-bdel 17013  ax-bdsb 17014  ax-bdsep 17076

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1405  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-rab 2537  df-v 2823  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-bdc 17033

This theorem is used by:  speano5  17136