Theorem copsex4g 4247

Description: An implicit substitution inference for 2 ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1995.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
copsex4g.1	⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷)) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
copsex4g	⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧∃𝑤((⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤   𝑥,𝐶,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤   𝑥,𝐷,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤   𝜓,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤   𝑥,𝑆,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤)

Proof of Theorem copsex4g

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqcom 2179	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)
2		vex 2740	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
3		vex 2740	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
4	2, 3	opth 4237	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ↔ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵))
5	1, 4	bitri 184	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ↔ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵))
6		eqcom 2179	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ↔ ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ = ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩)
7		vex 2740	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑧 ∈ V
8		vex 2740	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑤 ∈ V
9	7, 8	opth 4237	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ = ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ↔ (𝑧 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷))
10	6, 9	bitri 184	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ↔ (𝑧 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷))
11	5, 10	anbi12i 460	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩) ↔ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷)))
12	11	anbi1i 458	. . . 4 ⊢ (((⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷)) ∧ 𝜑))
13	12	a1i 9	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)) → (((⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷)) ∧ 𝜑)))
14	13	4exbidv 1870	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧∃𝑤((⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧∃𝑤(((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷)) ∧ 𝜑)))
15		id 19	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷)) → ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷)))
16		copsex4g.1	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷)) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
17	15, 16	cgsex4g 2774	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧∃𝑤(((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷)) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
18	14, 17	bitrd 188	1 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧∃𝑤((⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105   = wceq 1353  ∃wex 1492   ∈ wcel 2148  ⟨cop 3595

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 709  ax-5 1447  ax-7 1448  ax-gen 1449  ax-ie1 1493  ax-ie2 1494  ax-8 1504  ax-10 1505  ax-11 1506  ax-i12 1507  ax-bndl 1509  ax-4 1510  ax-17 1526  ax-i9 1530  ax-ial 1534  ax-i5r 1535  ax-14 2151  ax-ext 2159  ax-sep 4121  ax-pow 4174  ax-pr 4209

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 980  df-tru 1356  df-nf 1461  df-sb 1763  df-clab 2164  df-cleq 2170  df-clel 2173  df-nfc 2308  df-v 2739  df-un 3133  df-in 3135  df-ss 3142  df-pw 3577  df-sn 3598  df-pr 3599  df-op 3601

This theorem is referenced by:  opbrop  4705  ovi3  6010  dfplpq2  7352  dfmpq2  7353  enq0breq  7434