Theorem dfcoss2 39701

Description: Alternate definition of the class of cosets by 𝑅: 𝑥 and 𝑦 are cosets by 𝑅 iff there exists a set 𝑢 such that both 𝑥 and 𝑦 are are elements of the 𝑅-coset of 𝑢 (see also the comment of dfec2 8758). 𝑅 is usually a relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Jan-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfcoss2	⊢ ≀ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢(𝑥 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅)}

Distinct variable group:   𝑢,𝑅,𝑥,𝑦

Proof of Theorem dfcoss2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-coss 39699	. 2 ⊢ ≀ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢(𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑦)}
2		elecALTV 39469	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑥 ∈ V) → (𝑥 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ↔ 𝑢𝑅𝑥))
3	2	el2v 3461	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ↔ 𝑢𝑅𝑥)
4		elecALTV 39469	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V) → (𝑦 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ↔ 𝑢𝑅𝑦))
5	4	el2v 3461	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ↔ 𝑢𝑅𝑦)
6	3, 5	anbi12i 640	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅) ↔ (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑦))
7	6	exbii 1881	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑢(𝑥 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅) ↔ ∃𝑢(𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑦))
8	7	opabbii 5178	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢(𝑥 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅)} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢(𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑦)}
9	1, 8	eqtr4i 2789	1 ⊢ ≀ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢(𝑥 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅)}

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2147  Vcvv 3454   class class class wbr 5108  {copab 5173  [cec 8753   ≀ ccoss 39381

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5255  ax-pr 5398

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2102  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4841  df-br 5109  df-opab 5174  df-xp 5664  df-cnv 5666  df-dm 5668  df-rn 5669  df-res 5670  df-ima 5671  df-ec 8757  df-coss 39699

This theorem is used by:  coss0  39767