Theorem dfcoss2 39212

Description: Alternate definition of the class of cosets by 𝑅: 𝑥 and 𝑦 are cosets by 𝑅 iff there exists a set 𝑢 such that both 𝑥 and 𝑦 are are elements of the 𝑅-coset of 𝑢 (see also the comment of dfec2 8703). 𝑅 is usually a relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Jan-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfcoss2	⊢ ≀ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢(𝑥 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅)}

Distinct variable group:   𝑢,𝑅,𝑥,𝑦

Proof of Theorem dfcoss2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-coss 39210	. 2 ⊢ ≀ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢(𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑦)}
2		elecALTV 38980	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑥 ∈ V) → (𝑥 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ↔ 𝑢𝑅𝑥))
3	2	el2v 3464	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ↔ 𝑢𝑅𝑥)
4		elecALTV 38980	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V) → (𝑦 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ↔ 𝑢𝑅𝑦))
5	4	el2v 3464	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ↔ 𝑢𝑅𝑦)
6	3, 5	anbi12i 640	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅) ↔ (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑦))
7	6	exbii 1881	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑢(𝑥 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅) ↔ ∃𝑢(𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑦))
8	7	opabbii 5180	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢(𝑥 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅)} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢(𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑦)}
9	1, 8	eqtr4i 2791	1 ⊢ ≀ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢(𝑥 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅)}

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2146  Vcvv 3457   class class class wbr 5111  {copab 5175  [cec 8698   ≀ ccoss 38892

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-ext 2737  ax-sep 5259  ax-pr 5406

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-ral 3082  df-rex 3092  df-rab 3419  df-v 3459  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4287  df-if 4490  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-br 5112  df-opab 5176  df-xp 5669  df-cnv 5671  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-res 5675  df-ima 5676  df-ec 8702  df-coss 39210

This theorem is used by:  coss0  39278