Theorem dfcoss2 39572

Description: Alternate definition of the class of cosets by 𝑅: 𝑥 and 𝑦 are cosets by 𝑅 iff there exists a set 𝑢 such that both 𝑥 and 𝑦 are are elements of the 𝑅-coset of 𝑢 (see also the comment of dfec2 8728). 𝑅 is usually a relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Jan-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfcoss2	⊢ ≀ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢(𝑥 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅)}

Distinct variable group:   𝑢,𝑅,𝑥,𝑦

Proof of Theorem dfcoss2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-coss 39570	. 2 ⊢ ≀ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢(𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑦)}
2		elecALTV 39340	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑥 ∈ V) → (𝑥 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ↔ 𝑢𝑅𝑥))
3	2	el2v 3457	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ↔ 𝑢𝑅𝑥)
4		elecALTV 39340	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V) → (𝑦 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ↔ 𝑢𝑅𝑦))
5	4	el2v 3457	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ↔ 𝑢𝑅𝑦)
6	3, 5	anbi12i 640	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅) ↔ (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑦))
7	6	exbii 1880	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑢(𝑥 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅) ↔ ∃𝑢(𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑦))
8	7	opabbii 5171	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢(𝑥 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅)} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢(𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑦)}
9	1, 8	eqtr4i 2786	1 ⊢ ≀ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢(𝑥 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅)}

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1569  ∃wex 1811   ∈ wcel 2144  Vcvv 3450   class class class wbr 5102  {copab 5166  [cec 8723   ≀ ccoss 39252

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5248  ax-pr 5391

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-sb 2099  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-ss 3897  df-dif 4046  df-in 4090  df-un 4150  df-nul 4278  df-if 4482  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4835  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-xp 5657  df-cnv 5659  df-dm 5661  df-rn 5662  df-res 5663  df-ima 5664  df-ec 8727  df-coss 39570

This theorem is used by:  coss0  39638