Theorem dfcoss2 39435

Description: Alternate definition of the class of cosets by 𝑅: 𝑥 and 𝑦 are cosets by 𝑅 iff there exists a set 𝑢 such that both 𝑥 and 𝑦 are are elements of the 𝑅-coset of 𝑢 (see also the comment of dfec2 8720). 𝑅 is usually a relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Jan-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfcoss2	⊢ ≀ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢(𝑥 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅)}

Distinct variable group:   𝑢,𝑅,𝑥,𝑦

Proof of Theorem dfcoss2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-coss 39433	. 2 ⊢ ≀ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢(𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑦)}
2		elecALTV 39203	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑥 ∈ V) → (𝑥 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ↔ 𝑢𝑅𝑥))
3	2	el2v 3458	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ↔ 𝑢𝑅𝑥)
4		elecALTV 39203	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V) → (𝑦 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ↔ 𝑢𝑅𝑦))
5	4	el2v 3458	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ↔ 𝑢𝑅𝑦)
6	3, 5	anbi12i 640	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅) ↔ (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑦))
7	6	exbii 1881	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑢(𝑥 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅) ↔ ∃𝑢(𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑦))
8	7	opabbii 5172	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢(𝑥 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅)} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢(𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑦)}
9	1, 8	eqtr4i 2787	1 ⊢ ≀ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢(𝑥 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅)}

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2145  Vcvv 3451   class class class wbr 5103  {copab 5167  [cec 8715   ≀ ccoss 39115

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-ext 2733  ax-sep 5249  ax-pr 5391

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-xp 5657  df-cnv 5659  df-dm 5661  df-rn 5662  df-res 5663  df-ima 5664  df-ec 8719  df-coss 39433

This theorem is used by:  coss0  39501