Theorem linindslinci 47217

Description: The implications of being a linearly independent subset and a linear combination of this subset being 0. (Contributed by AV, 24-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 30-Jul-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
islininds.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)
islininds.z	⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀)
islininds.r	⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀)
islininds.e	⊢ 𝐸 = (Base‘𝑅)
islininds.0	⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
linindslinci	⊢ ((𝑆 linIndS 𝑀 ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m 𝑆) ∧ 𝐹 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 0 )

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑀   𝑥,𝑆   𝑥,𝐹

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐵(𝑥)   𝑅(𝑥)   𝐸(𝑥)   0 (𝑥)   𝑍(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem linindslinci

Dummy variable 𝑓 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		islininds.b	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)
2		islininds.z	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀)
3		islininds.r	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀)
4		islininds.e	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐸 = (Base‘𝑅)
5		islininds.0	. . . 4 ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)
6	1, 2, 3, 4, 5	linindsi 47216	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑆 linIndS 𝑀 → (𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m 𝑆)((𝑓 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 0 )))
7		breq1 5151	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑓 finSupp 0 ↔ 𝐹 finSupp 0 ))
8		oveq1 7419	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆))
9	8	eqeq1d 2733	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → ((𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍 ↔ (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍))
10	7, 9	anbi12d 630	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → ((𝑓 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍) ↔ (𝐹 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍)))
11		fveq1 6890	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑥))
12	11	eqeq1d 2733	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → ((𝑓‘𝑥) = 0 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) = 0 ))
13	12	ralbidv 3176	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 0 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 0 ))
14	10, 13	imbi12d 344	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (((𝑓 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 0 ) ↔ ((𝐹 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 0 )))
15	14	rspcv 3608	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m 𝑆) → (∀𝑓 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m 𝑆)((𝑓 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 0 ) → ((𝐹 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 0 )))
16	15	com23 86	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m 𝑆) → ((𝐹 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍) → (∀𝑓 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m 𝑆)((𝑓 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 0 ) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 0 )))
17	16	3impib 1115	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m 𝑆) ∧ 𝐹 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍) → (∀𝑓 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m 𝑆)((𝑓 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 0 ) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 0 ))
18	17	com12 32	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑓 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m 𝑆)((𝑓 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 0 ) → ((𝐹 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m 𝑆) ∧ 𝐹 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 0 ))
19	6, 18	simpl2im 503	. 2 ⊢ (𝑆 linIndS 𝑀 → ((𝐹 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m 𝑆) ∧ 𝐹 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 0 ))
20	19	imp 406	1 ⊢ ((𝑆 linIndS 𝑀 ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m 𝑆) ∧ 𝐹 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 0 )

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1086   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2105  ∀wral 3060  𝒫 cpw 4602   class class class wbr 5148  ‘cfv 6543  (class class class)co 7412   ↑_m cmap 8824   finSupp cfsupp 9365  Basecbs 17149  Scalarcsca 17205  0_gc0g 17390   linC clinc 47173   linIndS clininds 47209

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2107  ax-9 2115  ax-ext 2702  ax-sep 5299  ax-nul 5306  ax-pr 5427

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 845  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1781  df-sb 2067  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2723  df-clel 2809  df-ral 3061  df-rex 3070  df-rab 3432  df-v 3475  df-dif 3951  df-un 3953  df-in 3955  df-ss 3965  df-nul 4323  df-if 4529  df-pw 4604  df-sn 4629  df-pr 4631  df-op 4635  df-uni 4909  df-br 5149  df-opab 5211  df-xp 5682  df-rel 5683  df-iota 6495  df-fv 6551  df-ov 7415  df-lininds 47211

This theorem is referenced by: (None)