Theorem nffvd 6932

Description: Deduction version of bound-variable hypothesis builder nffv 6930. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nffvd.2	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐹)
nffvd.3	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nffvd	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹‘𝐴))

Proof of Theorem nffvd

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfaba1 2916	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐹}
2		nfaba1 2916	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}
3	1, 2	nffv 6930	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥({𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐹}‘{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴})
4		nffvd.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐹)
5		nffvd.3	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
6		nfnfc1 2911	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Ⅎ𝑥𝐹
7		nfnfc1 2911	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
8	6, 7	nfan 1898	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(Ⅎ𝑥𝐹 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
9		abidnf 3724	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐹 → {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐹} = 𝐹)
10	9	adantr 480	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝐹 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴) → {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐹} = 𝐹)
11		abidnf 3724	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴)
12	11	adantl 481	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝐹 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴) → {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴)
13	10, 12	fveq12d 6927	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝐹 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴) → ({𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐹}‘{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}) = (𝐹‘𝐴))
14	8, 13	nfceqdf 2904	. . 3 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝐹 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴) → (Ⅎ𝑥({𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐹}‘{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}) ↔ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹‘𝐴)))
15	4, 5, 14	syl2anc 583	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Ⅎ𝑥({𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐹}‘{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}) ↔ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹‘𝐴)))
16	3, 15	mpbii 233	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹‘𝐴))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1535   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2108  {cab 2717  Ⅎwnfc 2893  ‘cfv 6573

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2711

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1778  df-nf 1782  df-sb 2065  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-nfc 2895  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3077  df-rab 3444  df-v 3490  df-dif 3979  df-un 3981  df-ss 3993  df-nul 4353  df-if 4549  df-sn 4649  df-pr 4651  df-op 4655  df-uni 4932  df-br 5167  df-iota 6525  df-fv 6581

This theorem is referenced by:  nfovd  7477  nfixpw  8974  nfixp  8975  bj-gabima  36906