Theorem nffvd 6919

Description: Deduction version of bound-variable hypothesis builder nffv 6917. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nffvd.2	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐹)
nffvd.3	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nffvd	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹‘𝐴))

Proof of Theorem nffvd

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfaba1 2911	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐹}
2		nfaba1 2911	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}
3	1, 2	nffv 6917	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥({𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐹}‘{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴})
4		nffvd.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐹)
5		nffvd.3	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
6		nfnfc1 2906	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Ⅎ𝑥𝐹
7		nfnfc1 2906	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
8	6, 7	nfan 1897	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(Ⅎ𝑥𝐹 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
9		abidnf 3711	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐹 → {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐹} = 𝐹)
10	9	adantr 480	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝐹 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴) → {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐹} = 𝐹)
11		abidnf 3711	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴)
12	11	adantl 481	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝐹 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴) → {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴)
13	10, 12	fveq12d 6914	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝐹 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴) → ({𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐹}‘{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}) = (𝐹‘𝐴))
14	8, 13	nfceqdf 2899	. . 3 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝐹 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴) → (Ⅎ𝑥({𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐹}‘{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}) ↔ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹‘𝐴)))
15	4, 5, 14	syl2anc 584	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Ⅎ𝑥({𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐹}‘{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}) ↔ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹‘𝐴)))
16	3, 15	mpbii 233	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹‘𝐴))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1535   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2106  {cab 2712  Ⅎwnfc 2888  ‘cfv 6563

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1908  ax-6 1965  ax-7 2005  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2155  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2706

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1777  df-nf 1781  df-sb 2063  df-clab 2713  df-cleq 2727  df-clel 2814  df-nfc 2890  df-ral 3060  df-rex 3069  df-rab 3434  df-v 3480  df-dif 3966  df-un 3968  df-ss 3980  df-nul 4340  df-if 4532  df-sn 4632  df-pr 4634  df-op 4638  df-uni 4913  df-br 5149  df-iota 6516  df-fv 6571

This theorem is referenced by:  nfovd  7460  nfixpw  8955  nfixp  8956  bj-gabima  36923