| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 70 of 499) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-30893) |
(30894-32416) |
(32417-49836) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | fnsnfv 6901 | Singleton of function value. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by Scott Fenton, 8-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → {(𝐹‘𝐵)} = (𝐹 “ {𝐵})) | ||
| Theorem | opabiotafun 6902* | Define a function whose value is "the unique 𝑦 such that 𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦)". (Contributed by NM, 19-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}} ⇒ ⊢ Fun 𝐹 | ||
| Theorem | opabiotadm 6903* | Define a function whose value is "the unique 𝑦 such that 𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦)". (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}} ⇒ ⊢ dom 𝐹 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃!𝑦𝜑} | ||
| Theorem | opabiota 6904* | Define a function whose value is "the unique 𝑦 such that 𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦)". (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}} & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐹 → (𝐹‘𝐵) = (℩𝑦𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | fnimapr 6905 | The image of a pair under a function. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 6-Jan-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹 “ {𝐵, 𝐶}) = {(𝐹‘𝐵), (𝐹‘𝐶)}) | ||
| Theorem | fnimatpd 6906 | The image of an unordered triple under a function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Sep-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 “ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}) = {(𝐹‘𝐴), (𝐹‘𝐵), (𝐹‘𝐶)}) | ||
| Theorem | ssimaex 6907* | The existence of a subimage. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2007.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐹 “ 𝐴)) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 = (𝐹 “ 𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | ssimaexg 6908* | The existence of a subimage. (Contributed by FL, 15-Apr-2007.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐹 “ 𝐴)) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 = (𝐹 “ 𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | funfv 6909 | A simplified expression for the value of a function when we know it is a function. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∪ (𝐹 “ {𝐴})) | ||
| Theorem | funfv2 6910* | The value of a function. Definition of function value in [Enderton] p. 43. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑦}) | ||
| Theorem | funfv2f 6911 | The value of a function. Version of funfv2 6910 using a bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2006.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐹 ⇒ ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑦}) | ||
| Theorem | fvun 6912 | Value of the union of two functions when the domains are separate. (Contributed by FL, 7-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ (((Fun 𝐹 ∧ Fun 𝐺) ∧ (dom 𝐹 ∩ dom 𝐺) = ∅) → ((𝐹 ∪ 𝐺)‘𝐴) = ((𝐹‘𝐴) ∪ (𝐺‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | fvun1 6913 | The value of a union when the argument is in the first domain. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 29-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐵 ∧ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝐹 ∪ 𝐺)‘𝑋) = (𝐹‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | fvun2 6914 | The value of a union when the argument is in the second domain. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 29-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐵 ∧ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝐹 ∪ 𝐺)‘𝑋) = (𝐺‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | fvun1d 6915 | The value of a union when the argument is in the first domain, a deduction version. (Contributed by metakunt, 28-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∪ 𝐺)‘𝑋) = (𝐹‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | fvun2d 6916 | The value of a union when the argument is in the second domain, a deduction version. (Contributed by metakunt, 28-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∪ 𝐺)‘𝑋) = (𝐺‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | dffv2 6917 | Alternate definition of function value df-fv 6489 that doesn't require dummy variables. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2010.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∪ ((𝐹 “ {𝐴}) ∖ ∪ ∪ (((𝐹 ↾ {𝐴}) ∘ ◡(𝐹 ↾ {𝐴})) ∖ I )) | ||
| Theorem | dmfco 6918 | Domains of a function composition. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jan-1997.) |
| ⊢ ((Fun 𝐺 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐺) → (𝐴 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ↔ (𝐺‘𝐴) ∈ dom 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | fvco2 6919 | Value of a function composition. Similar to second part of Theorem 3H of [Enderton] p. 47. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 22-Oct-2011.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐺 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑋) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | fvco 6920 | Value of a function composition. Similar to Exercise 5 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 28. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((Fun 𝐺 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐺) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝐴) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | fvco3 6921 | Value of a function composition. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝐶) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | fvco3d 6922 | Value of a function composition. Deduction form of fvco3 6921. (Contributed by Stanislas Polu, 9-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝐶) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | fvco4i 6923 | Conditions for a composition to be expandable without conditions on the argument. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Mar-2015.) |
| ⊢ ∅ = (𝐹‘∅) & ⊢ Fun 𝐺 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑋) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | fvopab3g 6924* | Value of a function given by ordered-pair class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 6-Mar-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 → ∃!𝑦𝜑) & ⊢ 𝐹 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝜑)} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → ((𝐹‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ↔ 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | fvopab3ig 6925* | Value of a function given by ordered-pair class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-1999.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 → ∃*𝑦𝜑) & ⊢ 𝐹 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝜑)} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝜒 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | brfvopabrbr 6926* | The binary relation of a function value which is an ordered-pair class abstraction of a restricted binary relation is the restricted binary relation. The first hypothesis can often be obtained by using fvmptopab 7401. (Contributed by AV, 29-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴‘𝑍) = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥(𝐵‘𝑍)𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)} & ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ Rel (𝐵‘𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋(𝐴‘𝑍)𝑌 ↔ (𝑋(𝐵‘𝑍)𝑌 ∧ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | fvmptg 6927* | Value of a function given in maps-to notation. (Contributed by NM, 2-Oct-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑅) → (𝐹‘𝐴) = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | fvmpti 6928* | Value of a function given in maps-to notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ( I ‘𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | fvmpt 6929* | Value of a function given in maps-to notation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | fvmpt2f 6930 | Value of a function given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Mar-2017.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)‘𝑥) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | fvtresfn 6931* | Functionality of a tuple-restriction function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑥 ↾ 𝑉)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐹‘𝑋) = (𝑋 ↾ 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | fvmpts 6932* | Value of a function given in maps-to notation, using explicit class substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Jul-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | fvmpt3 6933* | Value of a function given in maps-to notation, with a slightly different sethood condition. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | fvmpt3i 6934* | Value of a function given in maps-to notation, with a slightly different sethood condition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | fvmptdf 6935* | Deduction version of fvmptd 6936 using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by AV, 29-Mar-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐵)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | fvmptd 6936* | Deduction version of fvmpt 6929. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 29-Mar-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐵)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | fvmptd2 6937* | Deduction version of fvmpt 6929 (where the definition of the mapping does not depend on the common antecedent 𝜑). (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | mptrcl 6938* | Reverse closure for a mapping: If the function value of a mapping has a member, the argument belongs to the base class of the mapping. (Contributed by AV, 4-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑋) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | fvmpt2i 6939* | Value of a function given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐹‘𝑥) = ( I ‘𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | fvmpt2 6940* | Value of a function given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 21-Jun-2010.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | fvmptss 6941* | If all the values of the mapping are subsets of a class 𝐶, then so is any evaluation of the mapping, even if 𝐷 is not in the base set 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 → (𝐹‘𝐷) ⊆ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | fvmpt2d 6942* | Deduction version of fvmpt2 6940. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | fvmptex 6943* | Express a function 𝐹 whose value 𝐵 may not always be a set in terms of another function 𝐺 for which sethood is guaranteed. (Note that ( I ‘𝐵) is just shorthand for if(𝐵 ∈ V, 𝐵, ∅), and it is always a set by fvex 6835.) Note also that these functions are not the same; wherever 𝐵(𝐶) is not a set, 𝐶 is not in the domain of 𝐹 (so it evaluates to the empty set), but 𝐶 is in the domain of 𝐺, and 𝐺(𝐶) is defined to be the empty set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ( I ‘𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹‘𝐶) = (𝐺‘𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | fvmptd3f 6944* | Alternate deduction version of fvmpt 6929 with three nonfreeness hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by AV, 19-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → ((𝐹‘𝐴) = 𝐵 → 𝜓)) & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐵) → 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | fvmptd2f 6945* | Alternate deduction version of fvmpt 6929, suitable for iteration. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 19-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → ((𝐹‘𝐴) = 𝐵 → 𝜓)) & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐵) → 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | fvmptdv 6946* | Alternate deduction version of fvmpt 6929, suitable for iteration. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → ((𝐹‘𝐴) = 𝐵 → 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐵) → 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | fvmptdv2 6947* | Alternate deduction version of fvmpt 6929, suitable for iteration. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘𝐴) = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | mpteqb 6948* | Bidirectional equality theorem for a mapping abstraction. Equivalent to eqfnfv 6964. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | fvmptt 6949* | Closed theorem form of fvmpt 6929. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ∧ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝐹‘𝐴) = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | fvmptf 6950* | Value of a function given by an ordered-pair class abstraction. This version of fvmptg 6927 uses bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐹‘𝐴) = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | fvmptnf 6951* | The value of a function given by an ordered-pair class abstraction is the empty set when the class it would otherwise map to is a proper class. This version of fvmptn 6954 uses bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ 𝐶 ∈ V → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | fvmptd3 6952* | Deduction version of fvmpt 6929. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | fvmptd4 6953* | Deduction version of fvmpt 6929 (where the substitution hypothesis does not have the antecedent 𝜑). (Contributed by SN, 26-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | fvmptn 6954* | This somewhat non-intuitive theorem tells us the value of its function is the empty set when the class 𝐶 it would otherwise map to is a proper class. This is a technical lemma that can help eliminate redundant sethood antecedents otherwise required by fvmptg 6927. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐷 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ 𝐶 ∈ V → (𝐹‘𝐷) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | fvmptss2 6955* | A mapping always evaluates to a subset of the substituted expression in the mapping, even if this is a proper class, or we are out of the domain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐷 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹‘𝐷) ⊆ 𝐶 | ||
| Theorem | elfvmptrab1w 6956* | Implications for the value of a function defined by the maps-to notation with a class abstraction as a result having an element. Here, the base set of the class abstraction depends on the argument of the function. Version of elfvmptrab1 6957 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2372. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Jul-2018.) Avoid ax-13 2372. (Revised by GG, 26-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑥 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ 𝜑}) & ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∈ V) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑌 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑋) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | elfvmptrab1 6957* | Implications for the value of a function defined by the maps-to notation with a class abstraction as a result having an element. Here, the base set of the class abstraction depends on the argument of the function. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2372. Use the weaker elfvmptrab1w 6956 when possible. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Jul-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑥 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ 𝜑}) & ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∈ V) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑌 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑋) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | elfvmptrab 6958* | Implications for the value of a function defined by the maps-to notation with a class abstraction as a result having an element. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Jul-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 ∣ 𝜑}) & ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑀 ∈ V) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑌 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑋) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | fvopab4ndm 6959* | Value of a function given by an ordered-pair class abstraction, outside of its domain. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-2008.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⇒ ⊢ (¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐹‘𝐵) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | fvmptndm 6960* | Value of a function given by the maps-to notation, outside of its domain. (Contributed by AV, 31-Dec-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐹‘𝑋) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | fvmptrabfv 6961* | Value of a function mapping a set to a class abstraction restricting the value of another function. (Contributed by AV, 18-Feb-2022.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ {𝑦 ∈ (𝐺‘𝑥) ∣ 𝜑}) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹‘𝑋) = {𝑦 ∈ (𝐺‘𝑋) ∣ 𝜓} | ||
| Theorem | fvopab5 6962* | The value of a function that is expressed as an ordered pair abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (℩𝑦𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | fvopab6 6963* | Value of a function given by ordered-pair class abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)} & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝐹‘𝐴) = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | eqfnfv 6964* | Equality of functions is determined by their values. Special case of Exercise 4 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 28 (with domain equality omitted). (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 22-Oct-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐴) → (𝐹 = 𝐺 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | eqfnfv2 6965* | Equality of functions is determined by their values. Exercise 4 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 28. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐵) → (𝐹 = 𝐺 ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑥)))) | ||
| Theorem | eqfnfv3 6966* | Derive equality of functions from equality of their values. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐵) → (𝐹 = 𝐺 ↔ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑥))))) | ||
| Theorem | eqfnfvd 6967* | Deduction for equality of functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = 𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | eqfnfv2f 6968* | Equality of functions is determined by their values. Special case of Exercise 4 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 28 (with domain equality omitted). This version of eqfnfv 6964 uses bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-2004.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐺 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐴) → (𝐹 = 𝐺 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | eqfunfv 6969* | Equality of functions is determined by their values. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ Fun 𝐺) → (𝐹 = 𝐺 ↔ (dom 𝐹 = dom 𝐺 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹(𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑥)))) | ||
| Theorem | eqfnun 6970 | Two functions on 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 are equal if and only if they have equal restrictions to both 𝐴 and 𝐵. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∧ 𝐺 Fn (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) → (𝐹 = 𝐺 ↔ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐴) = (𝐺 ↾ 𝐴) ∧ (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) = (𝐺 ↾ 𝐵)))) | ||
| Theorem | fvreseq0 6971* | Equality of restricted functions is determined by their values (for functions with different domains). (Contributed by AV, 6-Jan-2019.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)) → ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) = (𝐺 ↾ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | fvreseq1 6972* | Equality of a function restricted to the domain of another function. (Contributed by AV, 6-Jan-2019.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐵) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) = 𝐺 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | fvreseq 6973* | Equality of restricted functions is determined by their values. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by AV, 4-Mar-2019.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐴) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) = (𝐺 ↾ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | fnmptfvd 6974* | A function with a given domain is a mapping defined by its function values. (Contributed by AV, 1-Mar-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑎 → 𝐷 = 𝐶) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑀‘𝑖) = 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | fndmdif 6975* | Two ways to express the locus of differences between two functions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐴) → dom (𝐹 ∖ 𝐺) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐺‘𝑥)}) | ||
| Theorem | fndmdifcom 6976 | The difference set between two functions is commutative. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐴) → dom (𝐹 ∖ 𝐺) = dom (𝐺 ∖ 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | fndmdifeq0 6977 | The difference set of two functions is empty if and only if the functions are equal. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐴) → (dom (𝐹 ∖ 𝐺) = ∅ ↔ 𝐹 = 𝐺)) | ||
| Theorem | fndmin 6978* | Two ways to express the locus of equality between two functions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐴) → dom (𝐹 ∩ 𝐺) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑥)}) | ||
| Theorem | fneqeql 6979 | Two functions are equal iff their equalizer is the whole domain. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Mar-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐴) → (𝐹 = 𝐺 ↔ dom (𝐹 ∩ 𝐺) = 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | fneqeql2 6980 | Two functions are equal iff their equalizer contains the whole domain. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Mar-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐴) → (𝐹 = 𝐺 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ dom (𝐹 ∩ 𝐺))) | ||
| Theorem | fnreseql 6981 | Two functions are equal on a subset iff their equalizer contains that subset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Mar-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → ((𝐹 ↾ 𝑋) = (𝐺 ↾ 𝑋) ↔ 𝑋 ⊆ dom (𝐹 ∩ 𝐺))) | ||
| Theorem | chfnrn 6982* | The range of a choice function (a function that chooses an element from each member of its domain) is included in the union of its domain. (Contributed by NM, 31-Aug-1999.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝑥) → ran 𝐹 ⊆ ∪ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | funfvop 6983 | Ordered pair with function value. Part of Theorem 4.3(i) of [Monk1] p. 41. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-1996.) |
| ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → 〈𝐴, (𝐹‘𝐴)〉 ∈ 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | funfvbrb 6984 | Two ways to say that 𝐴 is in the domain of 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 ↔ 𝐴𝐹(𝐹‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | fvimacnvi 6985 | A member of a preimage is a function value argument. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-2007.) |
| ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐵)) → (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | fvimacnv 6986 | The argument of a function value belongs to the preimage of any class containing the function value. Raph Levien remarks: "This proof is unsatisfying, because it seems to me that funimass2 6564 could probably be strengthened to a biconditional." (Contributed by Raph Levien, 20-Nov-2006.) |
| ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → ((𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | funimass3 6987 | A kind of contraposition law that infers an image subclass from a subclass of a preimage. Raph Levien remarks: "Likely this could be proved directly, and fvimacnv 6986 would be the special case of 𝐴 being a singleton, but it works this way round too." (Contributed by Raph Levien, 20-Nov-2006.) |
| ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ dom 𝐹) → ((𝐹 “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | funimass5 6988* | A subclass of a preimage in terms of function values. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-2007.) |
| ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ dom 𝐹) → (𝐴 ⊆ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | funconstss 6989* | Two ways of specifying that a function is constant on a subdomain. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2007.) |
| ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ dom 𝐹) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ (◡𝐹 “ {𝐵}))) | ||
| Theorem | fvimacnvALT 6990 | Alternate proof of fvimacnv 6986, based on funimass3 6987. If funimass3 6987 is ever proved directly, as opposed to using funimacnv 6562 pointwise, then the proof of funimacnv 6562 should be replaced with this one. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 20-Nov-2006.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → ((𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | elpreima 6991 | Membership in the preimage of a set under a function. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐹‘𝐵) ∈ 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | elpreimad 6992 | Membership in the preimage of a set under a function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐵) ∈ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | fniniseg 6993 | Membership in the preimage of a singleton, under a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro , 28-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → (𝐶 ∈ (◡𝐹 “ {𝐵}) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐹‘𝐶) = 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | fncnvima2 6994* | Inverse images under functions expressed as abstractions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → (◡𝐹 “ 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐵}) | ||
| Theorem | fniniseg2 6995* | Inverse point images under functions expressed as abstractions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → (◡𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵}) | ||
| Theorem | unpreima 6996 | Preimage of a union. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (◡𝐹 “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) = ((◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∪ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | inpreima 6997 | Preimage of an intersection. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jun-2016.) |
| ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (◡𝐹 “ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) = ((◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∩ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | difpreima 6998 | Preimage of a difference. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jun-2016.) |
| ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (◡𝐹 “ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)) = ((◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∖ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | respreima 6999 | The preimage of a restricted function. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (◡(𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) “ 𝐴) = ((◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | cnvimainrn 7000 | The preimage of the intersection of the range of a class and a class 𝐴 is the preimage of the class 𝐴. (Contributed by AV, 17-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (◡𝐹 “ (ran 𝐹 ∩ 𝐴)) = (◡𝐹 “ 𝐴)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |