| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 8 of 504) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31060) |
(31061-32583) |
(32584-50374) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | mp4an 701 | An inference based on modus ponens. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 15-Jun-2010.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ 𝜒 & ⊢ 𝜃 & ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜏 | ||
| Theorem | mpan2d 702 | A deduction based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 12-Dec-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃)) | ||
| Theorem | mpand 703 | A deduction based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 12-Dec-2004.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 7-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) | ||
| Theorem | mpani 704 | An inference based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 19-Nov-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) | ||
| Theorem | mpan2i 705 | An inference based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 19-Nov-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝜒 & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃)) | ||
| Theorem | mp2ani 706 | An inference based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 12-Dec-2004.) |
| ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ 𝜒 & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | mp2and 707 | A deduction based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 12-Dec-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | mpanl1 708 | An inference based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 7-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | mpanl2 709 | An inference based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 7-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | mpanl12 710 | An inference based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jul-2005.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | mpanr1 711 | An inference based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 3-May-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 7-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | mpanr2 712 | An inference based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 3-May-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 7-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 7-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝜒 & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | mpanr12 713 | An inference based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2009.) |
| ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ 𝜒 & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | mpanlr1 714 | An inference based on modus ponens. (Contributed by NM, 30-Dec-2004.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 7-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) | ||
| Theorem | mpbirand 715 | Detach truth from conjunction in biconditional. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 3-Mar-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)) | ||
| Theorem | mpbiran2d 716 | Detach truth from conjunction in biconditional. Deduction form. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Sep-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | mpbiran 717 | Detach truth from conjunction in biconditional. (Contributed by NM, 27-Feb-1996.) |
| ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | mpbiran2 718 | Detach truth from conjunction in biconditional. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) |
| ⊢ 𝜒 & ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | mpbir2an 719 | Detach a conjunction of truths in a biconditional. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-2005.) |
| ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ 𝜒 & ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜑 | ||
| Theorem | mpbi2and 720 | Detach a conjunction of truths in a biconditional. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-Nov-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | mpbir2and 721 | Detach a conjunction of truths in a biconditional. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-Nov-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | adantll 722 | Deduction adding a conjunct to antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-Nov-2012.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝜃 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | adantlr 723 | Deduction adding a conjunct to antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-Nov-2012.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | adantrl 724 | Deduction adding a conjunct to antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-Nov-2012.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | adantrr 725 | Deduction adding a conjunct to antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-Nov-2012.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃)) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | adantlll 726 | Deduction adding a conjunct to antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 26-Dec-2004.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 2-Dec-2012.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝜏 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | adantllr 727 | Deduction adding a conjunct to antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 26-Dec-2004.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Dec-2012.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | adantlrl 728 | Deduction adding a conjunct to antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 26-Dec-2004.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Dec-2012.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝜏 ∧ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | adantlrr 729 | Deduction adding a conjunct to antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 26-Dec-2004.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Dec-2012.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜏)) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | adantrll 730 | Deduction adding a conjunct to antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 26-Dec-2004.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Dec-2012.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝜏 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | adantrlr 731 | Deduction adding a conjunct to antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 26-Dec-2004.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Dec-2012.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | adantrrl 732 | Deduction adding a conjunct to antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 26-Dec-2004.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Dec-2012.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ (𝜏 ∧ 𝜒))) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | adantrrr 733 | Deduction adding a conjunct to antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 26-Dec-2004.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Dec-2012.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏))) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | ad2antrr 734 | Deduction adding two conjuncts to antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 20-Nov-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | ad2antlr 735 | Deduction adding two conjuncts to antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 20-Nov-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | ad2antrl 736 | Deduction adding two conjuncts to antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜃)) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | ad2antll 737 | Deduction adding conjuncts to antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜑)) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | ad3antrrr 738 | Deduction adding three conjuncts to antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jul-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | ad3antlr 739 | Deduction adding three conjuncts to antecedent. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-Apr-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | ad4antr 740 | Deduction adding 4 conjuncts to antecedent. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-Apr-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | ad4antlr 741 | Deduction adding 4 conjuncts to antecedent. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-Apr-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (((((𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | ad5antr 742 | Deduction adding 5 conjuncts to antecedent. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-Apr-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | ad5antlr 743 | Deduction adding 5 conjuncts to antecedent. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-Apr-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ((((((𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | ad6antr 744 | Deduction adding 6 conjuncts to antecedent. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-Apr-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜎) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | ad6antlr 745 | Deduction adding 6 conjuncts to antecedent. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-Apr-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (((((((𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜎) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | ad7antr 746 | Deduction adding 7 conjuncts to antecedent. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-Apr-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ((((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝜌) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | ad7antlr 747 | Deduction adding 7 conjuncts to antecedent. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-Apr-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ((((((((𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝜌) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | ad8antr 748 | Deduction adding 8 conjuncts to antecedent. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-Apr-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (((((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝜌) ∧ 𝜇) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | ad8antlr 749 | Deduction adding 8 conjuncts to antecedent. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-Apr-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (((((((((𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝜌) ∧ 𝜇) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | ad9antr 750 | Deduction adding 9 conjuncts to antecedent. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-Apr-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ((((((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝜌) ∧ 𝜇) ∧ 𝜆) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | ad9antlr 751 | Deduction adding 9 conjuncts to antecedent. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-Apr-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ((((((((((𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝜌) ∧ 𝜇) ∧ 𝜆) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | ad10antr 752 | Deduction adding 10 conjuncts to antecedent. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-Apr-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (((((((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝜌) ∧ 𝜇) ∧ 𝜆) ∧ 𝜅) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | ad10antlr 753 | Deduction adding 10 conjuncts to antecedent. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-Apr-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (((((((((((𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝜌) ∧ 𝜇) ∧ 𝜆) ∧ 𝜅) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | ad2ant2l 754 | Deduction adding two conjuncts to antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2006.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝜃 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ (𝜏 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | ad2ant2r 755 | Deduction adding two conjuncts to antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2006.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜏)) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | ad2ant2lr 756 | Deduction adding two conjuncts to antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-2007.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝜃 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜏)) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | ad2ant2rl 757 | Deduction adding two conjuncts to antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 24-Nov-2007.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜏 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | adantl3r 758 | Deduction adding 1 conjunct to antecedent. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ (((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) | ||
| Theorem | ad4ant13 759 | Deduction adding conjuncts to antecedent. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 14-Apr-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | ad4ant14 760 | Deduction adding conjuncts to antecedent. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 14-Apr-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | ad4ant23 761 | Deduction adding conjuncts to antecedent. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 14-Apr-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝜃 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | ad4ant24 762 | Deduction adding conjuncts to antecedent. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 14-Apr-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝜃 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | adantl4r 763 | Deduction adding 1 conjunct to antecedent. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ (((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝜌) ∧ 𝜇) ∧ 𝜆) → 𝜅) ⇒ ⊢ ((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝜌) ∧ 𝜇) ∧ 𝜆) → 𝜅) | ||
| Theorem | ad5ant13 764 | Deduction adding conjuncts to antecedent. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 14-Apr-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ (((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | ad5ant14 765 | Deduction adding conjuncts to antecedent. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 14-Apr-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ (((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | ad5ant15 766 | Deduction adding conjuncts to antecedent. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 14-Apr-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ (((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | ad5ant23 767 | Deduction adding conjuncts to antecedent. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 14-Apr-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ (((((𝜃 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | ad5ant24 768 | Deduction adding conjuncts to antecedent. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 14-Apr-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ (((((𝜃 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | ad5ant25 769 | Deduction adding conjuncts to antecedent. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 14-Apr-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ (((((𝜃 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | adantl5r 770 | Deduction adding 1 conjunct to antecedent. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝜌) ∧ 𝜇) ∧ 𝜆) → 𝜅) ⇒ ⊢ (((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝜌) ∧ 𝜇) ∧ 𝜆) → 𝜅) | ||
| Theorem | adantl6r 771 | Deduction adding 1 conjunct to antecedent. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ (((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝜌) ∧ 𝜇) ∧ 𝜆) → 𝜅) ⇒ ⊢ ((((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝜌) ∧ 𝜇) ∧ 𝜆) → 𝜅) | ||
| Theorem | pm3.33 772 | Theorem *3.33 (Syll) of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | pm3.34 773 | Theorem *3.34 (Syll) of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜓 → 𝜒) ∧ (𝜑 → 𝜓)) → (𝜑 → 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | simpll 774 | Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2007.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | simplld 775 | Deduction form of simpll 774, eliminating a double conjunct. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | simplr 776 | Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 20-Mar-2007.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | simplrd 777 | Deduction eliminating a double conjunct. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | simprl 778 | Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 21-Mar-2007.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | simprld 779 | Deduction eliminating a double conjunct. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | simprr 780 | Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 21-Mar-2007.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | simprrd 781 | Deduction form of simprr 780, eliminating a double conjunct. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | simplll 782 | Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 28-Jul-2009.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 6-Apr-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | simpllr 783 | Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 28-Jul-2009.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 6-Apr-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | simplrl 784 | Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 28-Jul-2009.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | simplrr 785 | Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 28-Jul-2009.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | simprll 786 | Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 28-Jul-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃)) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | simprlr 787 | Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 28-Jul-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃)) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | simprrl 788 | Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 28-Jul-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃))) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | simprrr 789 | Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 28-Jul-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃))) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | simp-4l 790 | Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-May-2022.) |
| ⊢ (((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | simp-4r 791 | Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-May-2022.) |
| ⊢ (((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | simp-5l 792 | Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-May-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | simp-5r 793 | Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-May-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | simp-6l 794 | Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-May-2022.) |
| ⊢ (((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) → 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | simp-6r 795 | Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-May-2022.) |
| ⊢ (((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | simp-7l 796 | Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-May-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜎) → 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | simp-7r 797 | Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-May-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜎) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | simp-8l 798 | Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-May-2022.) |
| ⊢ (((((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝜌) → 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | simp-8r 799 | Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-May-2022.) |
| ⊢ (((((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝜌) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | simp-9l 800 | Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-May-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((((((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝜌) ∧ 𝜇) → 𝜑) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |