Theorem bj-idreseq 37150

Description: Sufficient condition for the restricted identity relation to agree with equality. Note that the instance of bj-ideqg 37145 with V substituted for 𝑉 is a direct consequence of bj-idreseq 37150. This is a strengthening of resieq 5961 which should be proved from it (note that currently, resieq 5961 relies on ideq 5816). Note that the intersection in the antecedent is not very meaningful, but is a device to prove versions with either class assumed to be a set. It could be enough to prove the version with a disjunctive antecedent: ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → ...). (Contributed by BJ, 25-Dec-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-idreseq	⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴( I ↾ 𝐶)𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem bj-idreseq

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bj-brresdm 37134	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴( I ↾ 𝐶)𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)
2		relres 5976	. . . . 5 ⊢ Rel ( I ↾ 𝐶)
3	2	brrelex2i 5695	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴( I ↾ 𝐶)𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ V)
4	1, 3	jca 511	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴( I ↾ 𝐶)𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
5	4	adantl 481	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴( I ↾ 𝐶)𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
6		eqimss 4005	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
7		dfss2 3932	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐴)
8	6, 7	sylib 218	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐴)
9	8	adantl 481	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐴)
10		simpl 482	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶)
11	9, 10	eqeltrrd 2829	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)
12		eqimss2 4006	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)
13		sseqin2 4186	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐵)
14	12, 13	sylib 218	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐵)
15	14	adantl 481	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐵)
16	15, 10	eqeltrrd 2829	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)
17	16	elexd 3471	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ V)
18	11, 17	jca 511	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
19		brres 5957	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ V → (𝐴( I ↾ 𝐶)𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 I 𝐵)))
20	19	adantl 481	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝐴( I ↾ 𝐶)𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 I 𝐵)))
21		eqeq12 2746	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
22		df-id 5533	. . . . 5 ⊢ I = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥 = 𝑦}
23	21, 22	brabga 5494	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝐴 I 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
24	23	anbi2d 630	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 I 𝐵) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
25		simp3 1138	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
26	25	3expib 1122	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
27		3simpb 1149	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
28	27	3expia 1121	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
29	26, 28	impbid 212	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
30	20, 24, 29	3bitrd 305	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝐴( I ↾ 𝐶)𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
31	5, 18, 30	pm5.21nd 801	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴( I ↾ 𝐶)𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109  Vcvv 3447   ∩ cin 3913   ⊆ wss 3914   class class class wbr 5107   I cid 5532   ↾ cres 5640

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-ext 2701  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5261  ax-pr 5387

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2721  df-clel 2803  df-ral 3045  df-rex 3054  df-rab 3406  df-v 3449  df-dif 3917  df-un 3919  df-in 3921  df-ss 3931  df-nul 4297  df-if 4489  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-br 5108  df-opab 5170  df-id 5533  df-xp 5644  df-rel 5645  df-res 5650

This theorem is referenced by: (None)