Theorem bj-idreseq 35377

Description: Sufficient condition for the restricted identity relation to agree with equality. Note that the instance of bj-ideqg 35372 with V substituted for 𝑉 is a direct consequence of bj-idreseq 35377. This is a strengthening of resieq 5914 which should be proved from it (note that currently, resieq 5914 relies on ideq 5774). Note that the intersection in the antecedent is not very meaningful, but is a device to prove versions with either class assumed to be a set. It could be enough to prove the version with a disjunctive antecedent: ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → ...). (Contributed by BJ, 25-Dec-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-idreseq	⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴( I ↾ 𝐶)𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem bj-idreseq

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bj-brresdm 35361	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴( I ↾ 𝐶)𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)
2		relres 5932	. . . . 5 ⊢ Rel ( I ↾ 𝐶)
3	2	brrelex2i 5655	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴( I ↾ 𝐶)𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ V)
4	1, 3	jca 513	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴( I ↾ 𝐶)𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
5	4	adantl 483	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴( I ↾ 𝐶)𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
6		eqimss 3982	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
7		df-ss 3909	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐴)
8	6, 7	sylib 217	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐴)
9	8	adantl 483	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐴)
10		simpl 484	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶)
11	9, 10	eqeltrrd 2838	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)
12		eqimss2 3983	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)
13		sseqin2 4155	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐵)
14	12, 13	sylib 217	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐵)
15	14	adantl 483	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐵)
16	15, 10	eqeltrrd 2838	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)
17	16	elexd 3457	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ V)
18	11, 17	jca 513	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
19		brres 5910	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ V → (𝐴( I ↾ 𝐶)𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 I 𝐵)))
20	19	adantl 483	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝐴( I ↾ 𝐶)𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 I 𝐵)))
21		eqeq12 2753	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
22		df-id 5500	. . . . 5 ⊢ I = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥 = 𝑦}
23	21, 22	brabga 5460	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝐴 I 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
24	23	anbi2d 630	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 I 𝐵) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
25		simp3 1138	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
26	25	3expib 1122	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
27		3simpb 1149	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
28	27	3expia 1121	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
29	26, 28	impbid 211	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
30	20, 24, 29	3bitrd 305	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝐴( I ↾ 𝐶)𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
31	5, 18, 30	pm5.21nd 800	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴( I ↾ 𝐶)𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 397   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2104  Vcvv 3437   ∩ cin 3891   ⊆ wss 3892   class class class wbr 5081   I cid 5499   ↾ cres 5602

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2106  ax-9 2114  ax-ext 2707  ax-sep 5232  ax-nul 5239  ax-pr 5361

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 398  df-or 846  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1780  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2714  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2814  df-ral 3063  df-rex 3072  df-rab 3287  df-v 3439  df-dif 3895  df-un 3897  df-in 3899  df-ss 3909  df-nul 4263  df-if 4466  df-sn 4566  df-pr 4568  df-op 4572  df-br 5082  df-opab 5144  df-id 5500  df-xp 5606  df-rel 5607  df-res 5612

This theorem is referenced by: (None)