Theorem reximssdv 3184

Description: Derivation of a restricted existential quantification over a subset (the second hypothesis implies 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵), deduction form. (Contributed by AV, 21-Aug-2022.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
reximssdv.1	⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
reximssdv.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
reximssdv.3	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜒)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
reximssdv	⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)

Distinct variable group:   𝜑,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥)   𝜒(𝑥)   𝐴(𝑥)   𝐵(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem reximssdv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		reximssdv.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
2		reximssdv.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
3		reximssdv.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜒)
4	2, 3	jca 521	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒))
5	4	ex 418	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)))
6	5	reximdv2 3176	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
7	1, 6	mpd 16	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∈ wcel 2146  ∃wrex 3090

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1944

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-ex 1812  df-rex 3091

This theorem is used by:  ttrcltr  9730  fin1a2lem6  10496  fpwwe2lem11  10739  pgpssslw  19843  efgrelexlemb  19979  lspsneq  21415  lbsextlem4  21454  neissex  23460  iscnp4  23596  nlly2i  23810  llynlly  23811  qtophmeo  24151  ovolicc2lem5  25857  itgsubst  26384  footexALT  29208  footex  29211  opphllem1  29238  irngnzply1  34379  weiunfr  37388  lcfl6  42703  mapdval2N  42833  mapdordlem2  42840  mapdpglem2  42876  hdmaprnlem10N  43062  primrootsunit1  43293  aks6d1c2  43326  aks6d1c6lem5  43373  aks5lem8  43397  pellfundglb  44038  oawordex2  44474  upciclem4  50430