Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > reximssdv | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Derivation of a restricted existential quantification over a subset (the second hypothesis implies 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵), deduction form. (Contributed by AV, 21-Aug-2022.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
reximssdv.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓) |
reximssdv.2 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) |
reximssdv.3 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜒) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
reximssdv | ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | reximssdv.1 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓) | |
2 | reximssdv.2 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) | |
3 | reximssdv.3 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜒) | |
4 | 2, 3 | jca 515 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)) |
5 | 4 | ex 416 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒))) |
6 | 5 | reximdv2 3180 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) |
7 | 1, 6 | mpd 15 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 399 ∈ wcel 2113 ∃wrex 3054 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1802 ax-4 1816 ax-5 1916 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 400 df-ex 1787 df-rex 3059 |
This theorem is referenced by: fin1a2lem6 9898 fpwwe2lem11 10134 pgpssslw 18850 efgrelexlemb 18987 lspsneq 20006 lbsextlem4 20045 neissex 21871 iscnp4 22007 nlly2i 22220 llynlly 22221 qtophmeo 22561 ovolicc2lem5 24266 itgsubst 24793 footexALT 26656 footex 26659 opphllem1 26685 lcfl6 39126 mapdval2N 39256 mapdpglem2 39299 hdmaprnlem10N 39485 pellfundglb 40263 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |