Theorem reximssdv 3180

Description: Derivation of a restricted existential quantification over a subset (the second hypothesis implies 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵), deduction form. (Contributed by AV, 21-Aug-2022.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
reximssdv.1	⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
reximssdv.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
reximssdv.3	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜒)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
reximssdv	⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)

Distinct variable group:   𝜑,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥)   𝜒(𝑥)   𝐴(𝑥)   𝐵(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem reximssdv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		reximssdv.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
2		reximssdv.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
3		reximssdv.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜒)
4	2, 3	jca 521	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒))
5	4	ex 418	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)))
6	5	reximdv2 3172	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
7	1, 6	mpd 16	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∈ wcel 2145  ∃wrex 3086

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-ex 1813  df-rex 3087

This theorem is used by:  ttrcltr  9698  fin1a2lem6  10410  fpwwe2lem11  10653  pgpssslw  19744  efgrelexlemb  19880  lspsneq  21312  lbsextlem4  21351  neissex  23355  iscnp4  23491  nlly2i  23705  llynlly  23706  qtophmeo  24046  ovolicc2lem5  25752  itgsubst  26279  footexALT  29075  footex  29078  opphllem1  29105  irngnzply1  34204  weiunfr  37089  lcfl6  42376  mapdval2N  42506  mapdordlem2  42513  mapdpglem2  42549  hdmaprnlem10N  42735  primrootsunit1  42966  aks6d1c2  42999  aks6d1c6lem5  43046  aks5lem8  43070  pellfundglb  43729  oawordex2  44170  upciclem4  50098