Theorem reximssdv 3185

Description: Derivation of a restricted existential quantification over a subset (the second hypothesis implies 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵), deduction form. (Contributed by AV, 21-Aug-2022.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
reximssdv.1	⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
reximssdv.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
reximssdv.3	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜒)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
reximssdv	⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)

Distinct variable group:   𝜑,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥)   𝜒(𝑥)   𝐴(𝑥)   𝐵(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem reximssdv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		reximssdv.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
2		reximssdv.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
3		reximssdv.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜒)
4	2, 3	jca 521	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒))
5	4	ex 418	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)))
6	5	reximdv2 3177	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
7	1, 6	mpd 16	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∈ wcel 2146  ∃wrex 3091

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-ex 1813  df-rex 3092

This theorem is used by:  ttrcltr  9692  fin1a2lem6  10404  fpwwe2lem11  10645  pgpssslw  19732  efgrelexlemb  19868  lspsneq  21300  lbsextlem4  21339  neissex  23338  iscnp4  23474  nlly2i  23688  llynlly  23689  qtophmeo  24029  ovolicc2lem5  25735  itgsubst  26263  footexALT  29053  footex  29056  opphllem1  29083  irngnzply1  34149  weiunfr  37039  lcfl6  42336  mapdval2N  42466  mapdordlem2  42473  mapdpglem2  42509  hdmaprnlem10N  42695  primrootsunit1  42926  aks6d1c2  42959  aks6d1c6lem5  43006  aks5lem8  43030  pellfundglb  43689  oawordex2  44130  upciclem4  50023