| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > sltsss2 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: The second argument of surreal set is a set of surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Dec-2021.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| sltsss2 | ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → 𝐵 ⊆ No ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | brslts 27832 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 <s 𝑦))) | |
| 2 | simpr2 1208 | . 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 <s 𝑦)) → 𝐵 ⊆ No ) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | sylbi 219 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → 𝐵 ⊆ No ) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 399 ∧ w3a 1097 ∈ wcel 2141 ∀wral 3075 Vcvv 3453 ⊆ wss 3904 class class class wbr 5099 No csur 27681 <s clts 27682 <<s cslts 27827 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1814 ax-4 1828 ax-5 1929 ax-6 1986 ax-7 2027 ax-8 2143 ax-9 2151 ax-ext 2733 ax-sep 5245 ax-pr 5389 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 209 df-an 400 df-or 859 df-3an 1099 df-tru 1562 df-fal 1572 df-ex 1799 df-sb 2090 df-clab 2740 df-cleq 2753 df-clel 2836 df-ral 3076 df-rex 3086 df-rab 3414 df-v 3455 df-dif 3907 df-un 3909 df-in 3911 df-ss 3921 df-nul 4286 df-if 4480 df-sn 4582 df-pr 4584 df-op 4588 df-br 5100 df-opab 5162 df-xp 5651 df-slts 27828 |
| This theorem is referenced by: ssslts1 27843 ssslts2 27844 conway 27849 sltstr 27857 sltsun1 27858 sltsun2 27859 etaslts 27863 lesrec 27869 ltsrec 27871 eqcuts3 27874 cofslts 27988 coinitslts 27989 cofcut1 27990 cofcutr 27994 cutlt 28002 cutmax 28004 addsuniflem 28071 negsunif 28125 sltmuls1 28217 sltmuls2 28218 mulsuniflem 28219 mulsunif2lem 28239 precsexlem11 28287 renegscl 28568 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |