P. 278 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 27701-27800   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Definition	df-no 27701*	Define the class of surreal numbers. The surreal numbers are a proper class of numbers developed by John H. Conway and introduced by Donald Knuth in 1975. They form a proper class into which all ordered fields can be embedded. The approach we take to defining them was first introduced by Hary Gonshor, and is based on the conception of a "sign expansion" of a surreal number. We define the surreals as ordinal-indexed sequences of 1o and 2o, analogous to Gonshor's ( − ) and ( + ). After introducing this definition, we will abstract away from it using axioms that Norman Alling developed in "Foundations of Analysis over Surreal Number Fields." This is done in an effort to be agnostic towards the exact implementation of surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Jun-2011.)
⊢ No = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑎 ∈ On 𝑓:𝑎⟶{1o, 2o}}
Definition	df-slt 27702*	Next, we introduce surreal less-than, a comparison relation over the surreals by lexicographically ordering them. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Jun-2011.)
⊢ <s = {⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ No ∧ 𝑔 ∈ No ) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑔‘𝑦) ∧ (𝑓‘𝑥){⟨1o, ∅⟩, ⟨1o, 2o⟩, ⟨∅, 2o⟩} (𝑔‘𝑥)))}
Definition	df-bday 27703	Finally, we introduce the birthday function. This function maps each surreal to an ordinal. In our implementation, this is the domain of the sign function. The important properties of this function are established later. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Jun-2011.)
⊢ bday = (𝑥 ∈ No ↦ dom 𝑥)
Theorem	elno 27704*	Membership in the surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by SF, 14-Apr-2012.) Avoid ax-rep 5284. (Revised by SN, 5-Jun-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴:𝑥⟶{1o, 2o})
Theorem	elnoOLD 27705*	Obsolete version of elno 27704 as of 5-Jun-2025. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴:𝑥⟶{1o, 2o})
Theorem	sltval 27706*	The value of the surreal less-than relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝐴‘𝑦) = (𝐵‘𝑦) ∧ (𝐴‘𝑥){⟨1o, ∅⟩, ⟨1o, 2o⟩, ⟨∅, 2o⟩} (𝐵‘𝑥))))
Theorem	bdayval 27707	The value of the birthday function within the surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ( bday ‘𝐴) = dom 𝐴)
Theorem	nofun 27708	A surreal is a function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → Fun 𝐴)
Theorem	nodmon 27709	The domain of a surreal is an ordinal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → dom 𝐴 ∈ On)
Theorem	norn 27710	The range of a surreal is a subset of the surreal signs. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ran 𝐴 ⊆ {1o, 2o})
Theorem	nofnbday 27711	A surreal is a function over its birthday. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → 𝐴 Fn ( bday ‘𝐴))
Theorem	nodmord 27712	The domain of a surreal has the ordinal property. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → Ord dom 𝐴)
Theorem	elno2 27713	An alternative condition for membership in No . (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Mar-2012.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No ↔ (Fun 𝐴 ∧ dom 𝐴 ∈ On ∧ ran 𝐴 ⊆ {1o, 2o}))
Theorem	elno3 27714	Another condition for membership in No . (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Apr-2012.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No ↔ (𝐴:dom 𝐴⟶{1o, 2o} ∧ dom 𝐴 ∈ On))
Theorem	sltval2 27715*	Alternate expression for surreal less-than. Two surreals obey surreal less-than iff they obey the sign ordering at the first place they differ. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴‘∩ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑎) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑎)}){⟨1o, ∅⟩, ⟨1o, 2o⟩, ⟨∅, 2o⟩} (𝐵‘∩ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑎) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑎)})))
Theorem	nofv 27716	The function value of a surreal is either a sign or the empty set. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ((𝐴‘𝑋) = ∅ ∨ (𝐴‘𝑋) = 1o ∨ (𝐴‘𝑋) = 2o))
Theorem	nosgnn0 27717	∅ is not a surreal sign. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ {1o, 2o}
Theorem	nosgnn0i 27718	If 𝑋 is a surreal sign, then it is not null. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Aug-2011.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ {1o, 2o}    ⇒   ⊢ ∅ ≠ 𝑋
Theorem	noreson 27719	The restriction of a surreal to an ordinal is still a surreal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ∈ No )
Theorem	sltintdifex 27720*	If 𝐴 <s 𝐵, then the intersection of all the ordinals that have differing signs in 𝐴 and 𝐵 exists. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Feb-2012.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 → ∩ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑎) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑎)} ∈ V))
Theorem	sltres 27721	If the restrictions of two surreals to a given ordinal obey surreal less-than, then so do the two surreals themselves. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝑋 ∈ On) → ((𝐴 ↾ 𝑋) <s (𝐵 ↾ 𝑋) → 𝐴 <s 𝐵))
Theorem	noxp1o 27722	The Cartesian product of an ordinal and {1o} is a surreal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 × {1o}) ∈ No )
Theorem	noseponlem 27723*	Lemma for nosepon 27724. Consider a case of proper subset domain. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ dom 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐵) → ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ On (𝐴‘𝑥) = (𝐵‘𝑥))
Theorem	nosepon 27724*	Given two unequal surreals, the minimal ordinal at which they differ is an ordinal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)} ∈ On)
Theorem	noextend 27725	Extending a surreal by one sign value results in a new surreal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ {1o, 2o}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (𝐴 ∪ {⟨dom 𝐴, 𝑋⟩}) ∈ No )
Theorem	noextendseq 27726	Extend a surreal by a sequence of ordinals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 30-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ {1o, 2o}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ∪ ((𝐵 ∖ dom 𝐴) × {𝑋})) ∈ No )
Theorem	noextenddif 27727*	Calculate the place where a surreal and its extension differ. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ {1o, 2o}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ ((𝐴 ∪ {⟨dom 𝐴, 𝑋⟩})‘𝑥)} = dom 𝐴)
Theorem	noextendlt 27728	Extending a surreal with a negative sign results in a smaller surreal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (𝐴 ∪ {⟨dom 𝐴, 1o⟩}) <s 𝐴)
Theorem	noextendgt 27729	Extending a surreal with a positive sign results in a bigger surreal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → 𝐴 <s (𝐴 ∪ {⟨dom 𝐴, 2o⟩}))
Theorem	nolesgn2o 27730	Given 𝐴 less-than or equal to 𝐵, equal to 𝐵 up to 𝑋, and 𝐴(𝑋) = 2o, then 𝐵(𝑋) = 2o. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝑋 ∈ On) ∧ ((𝐴 ↾ 𝑋) = (𝐵 ↾ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐴‘𝑋) = 2o) ∧ ¬ 𝐵 <s 𝐴) → (𝐵‘𝑋) = 2o)
Theorem	nolesgn2ores 27731	Given 𝐴 less-than or equal to 𝐵, equal to 𝐵 up to 𝑋, and 𝐴(𝑋) = 2o, then (𝐴 ↾ suc 𝑋) = (𝐵 ↾ suc 𝑋). (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝑋 ∈ On) ∧ ((𝐴 ↾ 𝑋) = (𝐵 ↾ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐴‘𝑋) = 2o) ∧ ¬ 𝐵 <s 𝐴) → (𝐴 ↾ suc 𝑋) = (𝐵 ↾ suc 𝑋))
Theorem	nogesgn1o 27732	Given 𝐴 greater than or equal to 𝐵, equal to 𝐵 up to 𝑋, and 𝐴(𝑋) = 1o, then 𝐵(𝑋) = 1o. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝑋 ∈ On) ∧ ((𝐴 ↾ 𝑋) = (𝐵 ↾ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐴‘𝑋) = 1o) ∧ ¬ 𝐴 <s 𝐵) → (𝐵‘𝑋) = 1o)
Theorem	nogesgn1ores 27733	Given 𝐴 greater than or equal to 𝐵, equal to 𝐵 up to 𝑋, and 𝐴(𝑋) = 1o, then (𝐴 ↾ suc 𝑋) = (𝐵 ↾ suc 𝑋). (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝑋 ∈ On) ∧ ((𝐴 ↾ 𝑋) = (𝐵 ↾ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐴‘𝑋) = 1o) ∧ ¬ 𝐴 <s 𝐵) → (𝐴 ↾ suc 𝑋) = (𝐵 ↾ suc 𝑋))
15.1.2  Ordering
Theorem	sltsolem1 27734	Lemma for sltso 27735. The "sign expansion" binary relation totally orders the surreal signs. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Jun-2011.)
⊢ {⟨1o, ∅⟩, ⟨1o, 2o⟩, ⟨∅, 2o⟩} Or ({1o, 2o} ∪ {∅})
Theorem	sltso 27735	Less-than totally orders the surreals. Axiom O of [Alling] p. 184. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Jun-2011.)
⊢ <s Or No
15.1.3  Birthday Function
Theorem	bdayfo 27736	The birthday function maps the surreals onto the ordinals. Axiom B of [Alling] p. 184. (Proof shortened on 14-Apr-2012 by SF). (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Jun-2011.)
⊢ bday : No –onto→On
15.1.4  Density
Theorem	fvnobday 27737	The value of a surreal at its birthday is ∅. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by SF, 14-Apr-2012.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (𝐴‘( bday ‘𝐴)) = ∅)
Theorem	nosepnelem 27738*	Lemma for nosepne 27739. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Nov-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵) → (𝐴‘∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)}) ≠ (𝐵‘∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)}))
Theorem	nosepne 27739*	The value of two non-equal surreals at the first place they differ is different. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Nov-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → (𝐴‘∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)}) ≠ (𝐵‘∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)}))
Theorem	nosep1o 27740*	If the value of a surreal at a separator is 1o then the surreal is lesser. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴‘∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)}) = 1o) → 𝐴 <s 𝐵)
Theorem	nosep2o 27741*	If the value of a surreal at a separator is 2o then the surreal is greater. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴‘∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐵‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐴‘𝑥)}) = 2o) → 𝐵 <s 𝐴)
Theorem	nosepdmlem 27742*	Lemma for nosepdm 27743. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Nov-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵) → ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)} ∈ (dom 𝐴 ∪ dom 𝐵))
Theorem	nosepdm 27743*	The first place two surreals differ is an element of the larger of their domains. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Nov-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)} ∈ (dom 𝐴 ∪ dom 𝐵))
Theorem	nosepeq 27744*	The values of two surreals at a point less than their separators are equal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)}) → (𝐴‘𝑋) = (𝐵‘𝑋))
Theorem	nosepssdm 27745*	Given two non-equal surreals, their separator is less-than or equal to the domain of one of them. Part of Lemma 2.1.1 of [Lipparini] p. 3. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)} ⊆ dom 𝐴)
Theorem	nodenselem4 27746*	Lemma for nodense 27751. Show that a particular abstraction is an ordinal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵) → ∩ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑎) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑎)} ∈ On)
Theorem	nodenselem5 27747*	Lemma for nodense 27751. If the birthdays of two distinct surreals are equal, then the ordinal from nodenselem4 27746 is an element of that birthday. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) ∧ (( bday ‘𝐴) = ( bday ‘𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵)) → ∩ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑎) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑎)} ∈ ( bday ‘𝐴))
Theorem	nodenselem6 27748*	The restriction of a surreal to the abstraction from nodenselem4 27746 is still a surreal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) ∧ (( bday ‘𝐴) = ( bday ‘𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵)) → (𝐴 ↾ ∩ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑎) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑎)}) ∈ No )
Theorem	nodenselem7 27749*	Lemma for nodense 27751. 𝐴 and 𝐵 are equal at all elements of the abstraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) ∧ (( bday ‘𝐴) = ( bday ‘𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵)) → (𝐶 ∈ ∩ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑎) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑎)} → (𝐴‘𝐶) = (𝐵‘𝐶)))
Theorem	nodenselem8 27750*	Lemma for nodense 27751. Give a condition for surreal less-than when two surreals have the same birthday. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ ( bday ‘𝐴) = ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ ((𝐴‘∩ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑎) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑎)}) = 1o ∧ (𝐵‘∩ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑎) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑎)}) = 2o)))
Theorem	nodense 27751*	Given two distinct surreals with the same birthday, there is an older surreal lying between the two of them. Axiom SD of [Alling] p. 184. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) ∧ (( bday ‘𝐴) = ( bday ‘𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ No (( bday ‘𝑥) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐴) ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 <s 𝐵))
15.1.5  Full-Eta Property The theorems in this section are derived from "A clean way to separate sets of surreals" by Paolo Lipparini, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1712.03500.
Theorem	bdayimaon 27752	Lemma for full-eta properties. The successor of the union of the image of the birthday function under a set is an ordinal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∈ On)
Theorem	nolt02olem 27753	Lemma for nolt02o 27754. If 𝐴(𝑋) is undefined with 𝐴 surreal and 𝑋 ordinal, then dom 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑋. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝑋 ∈ On ∧ (𝐴‘𝑋) = ∅) → dom 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑋)
Theorem	nolt02o 27754	Given 𝐴 less-than 𝐵, equal to 𝐵 up to 𝑋, and undefined at 𝑋, then 𝐵(𝑋) = 2o. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝑋 ∈ On) ∧ ((𝐴 ↾ 𝑋) = (𝐵 ↾ 𝑋) ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴‘𝑋) = ∅) → (𝐵‘𝑋) = 2o)
Theorem	nogt01o 27755	Given 𝐴 greater than 𝐵, equal to 𝐵 up to 𝑋, and 𝐵(𝑋) undefined, then 𝐴(𝑋) = 1o. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝑋 ∈ On) ∧ ((𝐴 ↾ 𝑋) = (𝐵 ↾ 𝑋) ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵) ∧ (𝐵‘𝑋) = ∅) → (𝐴‘𝑋) = 1o)
Theorem	noresle 27756*	Restriction law for surreals. Lemma 2.1.4 of [Lipparini] p. 3. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (((𝑈 ∈ No ∧ 𝑆 ∈ No ) ∧ (dom 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ dom 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ (𝑆 ↾ suc 𝑔) <s (𝑈 ↾ suc 𝑔))) → ¬ 𝑆 <s 𝑈)
Theorem	nomaxmo 27757*	A class of surreals has at most one maximum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝑆 ⊆ No → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦)
Theorem	nominmo 27758*	A class of surreals has at most one minimum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝑆 ⊆ No → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥)
Theorem	nosupprefixmo 27759*	In any class of surreals, there is at most one value of the prefix property. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ No → ∃*𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐺 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝐺) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝐺)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝐺) = 𝑥))
Theorem	noinfprefixmo 27760*	In any class of surreals, there is at most one value of the prefix property. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ No → ∃*𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐺 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝐺) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝐺)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝐺) = 𝑥))
Theorem	nosupcbv 27761*	Lemma to change bound variables in a surreal supremum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑎 <s 𝑏, ((℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑎 <s 𝑏) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑎 <s 𝑏), 2o⟩}), (𝑐 ∈ {𝑑 ∣ ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑑 ∈ dom 𝑒 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑓 <s 𝑒 → (𝑒 ↾ suc 𝑑) = (𝑓 ↾ suc 𝑑)))} ↦ (℩𝑎∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑐 ∈ dom 𝑒 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑓 <s 𝑒 → (𝑒 ↾ suc 𝑐) = (𝑓 ↾ suc 𝑐)) ∧ (𝑒‘𝑐) = 𝑎))))
Theorem	nosupno 27762*	The next several theorems deal with a surreal "supremum". This surreal will ultimately be shown to bound 𝐴 below and bound the restriction of any surreal above. We begin by showing that the given expression actually defines a surreal number. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝑆 ∈ No )
Theorem	nosupdm 27763*	The domain of the surreal supremum when there is no maximum. The primary point of this theorem is to change bound variable. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦 → dom 𝑆 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑧 ∈ dom 𝑝 ∧ ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑞 <s 𝑝 → (𝑝 ↾ suc 𝑧) = (𝑞 ↾ suc 𝑧)))})
Theorem	nosupbday 27764*	Birthday bounding law for surreal supremum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ (𝑂 ∈ On ∧ ( bday “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝑂)) → ( bday ‘𝑆) ⊆ 𝑂)
Theorem	nosupfv 27765*	The value of surreal supremum when there is no maximum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦 ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ dom 𝑈 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑈 → (𝑈 ↾ suc 𝐺) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝐺)))) → (𝑆‘𝐺) = (𝑈‘𝐺))
Theorem	nosupres 27766*	A restriction law for surreal supremum when there is no maximum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦 ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ dom 𝑈 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑈 → (𝑈 ↾ suc 𝐺) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝐺)))) → (𝑆 ↾ suc 𝐺) = (𝑈 ↾ suc 𝐺))
Theorem	nosupbnd1lem1 27767*	Lemma for nosupbnd1 27773. Establish a soft upper bound. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦 ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝑆 <s (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑆))
Theorem	nosupbnd1lem2 27768*	Lemma for nosupbnd1 27773. When there is no maximum, if any member of 𝐴 is a prolongment of 𝑆, then so are all elements of 𝐴 above it. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦 ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ ((𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑆) = 𝑆) ∧ (𝑊 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑊 <s 𝑈))) → (𝑊 ↾ dom 𝑆) = 𝑆)
Theorem	nosupbnd1lem3 27769*	Lemma for nosupbnd1 27773. If 𝑈 is a prolongment of 𝑆 and in 𝐴, then (𝑈‘dom 𝑆) is not 2o. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦 ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑆) = 𝑆)) → (𝑈‘dom 𝑆) ≠ 2o)
Theorem	nosupbnd1lem4 27770*	Lemma for nosupbnd1 27773. If 𝑈 is a prolongment of 𝑆 and in 𝐴, then (𝑈‘dom 𝑆) is not undefined. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦 ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑆) = 𝑆)) → (𝑈‘dom 𝑆) ≠ ∅)
Theorem	nosupbnd1lem5 27771*	Lemma for nosupbnd1 27773. If 𝑈 is a prolongment of 𝑆 and in 𝐴, then (𝑈‘dom 𝑆) is not 1o. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦 ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑆) = 𝑆)) → (𝑈‘dom 𝑆) ≠ 1o)
Theorem	nosupbnd1lem6 27772*	Lemma for nosupbnd1 27773. Establish a hard upper bound when there is no maximum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦 ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑆) <s 𝑆)
Theorem	nosupbnd1 27773*	Bounding law from below for the surreal supremum. Proposition 4.2 of [Lipparini] p. 6. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑆) <s 𝑆)
Theorem	nosupbnd2lem1 27774*	Bounding law from above when a set of surreals has a maximum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (((𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑈 <s 𝑦) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑍 ∈ No ) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 𝑎 <s 𝑍) → ¬ (𝑍 ↾ suc dom 𝑈) <s (𝑈 ∪ {⟨dom 𝑈, 2o⟩}))
Theorem	nosupbnd2 27775*	Bounding law from above for the surreal supremum. Proposition 4.3 of [Lipparini] p. 6. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑍 ∈ No ) → (∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 𝑎 <s 𝑍 ↔ ¬ (𝑍 ↾ dom 𝑆) <s 𝑆))
Theorem	noinfcbv 27776*	Change bound variables for surreal infimum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑏 <s 𝑎, ((℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑏 <s 𝑎) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑏 <s 𝑎), 1o⟩}), (𝑐 ∈ {𝑏 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑏 ∈ dom 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑑 <s 𝑒 → (𝑑 ↾ suc 𝑏) = (𝑒 ↾ suc 𝑏)))} ↦ (℩𝑎∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑐 ∈ dom 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑑 <s 𝑒 → (𝑑 ↾ suc 𝑐) = (𝑒 ↾ suc 𝑐)) ∧ (𝑑‘𝑐) = 𝑎))))
Theorem	noinfno 27777*	The next several theorems deal with a surreal "infimum". This surreal will ultimately be shown to bound 𝐵 above and bound the restriction of any surreal below. We begin by showing that the given expression actually defines a surreal number. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝑇 ∈ No )
Theorem	noinfdm 27778*	Next, we calculate the domain of 𝑇. This is mostly to change bound variables. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥 → dom 𝑇 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ dom 𝑝 ∧ ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑝 <s 𝑞 → (𝑝 ↾ suc 𝑧) = (𝑞 ↾ suc 𝑧)))})
Theorem	noinfbday 27779*	Birthday bounding law for surreal infimum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑂 ∈ On ∧ ( bday “ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝑂)) → ( bday ‘𝑇) ⊆ 𝑂)
Theorem	noinffv 27780*	The value of surreal infimum when there is no minimum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥 ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ dom 𝑈 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑈 <s 𝑣 → (𝑈 ↾ suc 𝐺) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝐺)))) → (𝑇‘𝐺) = (𝑈‘𝐺))
Theorem	noinfres 27781*	The restriction of surreal infimum when there is no minimum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥 ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ dom 𝑈 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑈 <s 𝑣 → (𝑈 ↾ suc 𝐺) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝐺)))) → (𝑇 ↾ suc 𝐺) = (𝑈 ↾ suc 𝐺))
Theorem	noinfbnd1lem1 27782*	Lemma for noinfbnd1 27788. Establish a soft lower bound. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥 ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑇) <s 𝑇)
Theorem	noinfbnd1lem2 27783*	Lemma for noinfbnd1 27788. When there is no minimum, if any member of 𝐵 is a prolongment of 𝑇, then so are all elements below it. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥 ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ ((𝑈 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑇) = 𝑇) ∧ (𝑊 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑈 <s 𝑊))) → (𝑊 ↾ dom 𝑇) = 𝑇)
Theorem	noinfbnd1lem3 27784*	Lemma for noinfbnd1 27788. If 𝑈 is a prolongment of 𝑇 and in 𝐵, then (𝑈‘dom 𝑇) is not 1o. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥 ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑇) = 𝑇)) → (𝑈‘dom 𝑇) ≠ 1o)
Theorem	noinfbnd1lem4 27785*	Lemma for noinfbnd1 27788. If 𝑈 is a prolongment of 𝑇 and in 𝐵, then (𝑈‘dom 𝑇) is not undefined. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥 ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑇) = 𝑇)) → (𝑈‘dom 𝑇) ≠ ∅)
Theorem	noinfbnd1lem5 27786*	Lemma for noinfbnd1 27788. If 𝑈 is a prolongment of 𝑇 and in 𝐵, then (𝑈‘dom 𝑇) is not 2o. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥 ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑇) = 𝑇)) → (𝑈‘dom 𝑇) ≠ 2o)
Theorem	noinfbnd1lem6 27787*	Lemma for noinfbnd1 27788. Establish a hard lower bound when there is no minimum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥 ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑇 <s (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑇))
Theorem	noinfbnd1 27788*	Bounding law from above for the surreal infimum. Analagous to proposition 4.2 of [Lipparini] p. 6. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑇 <s (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑇))
Theorem	noinfbnd2lem1 27789*	Bounding law from below when a set of surreals has a minimum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (((𝑈 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑈) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ No ) ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑍 <s 𝑏) → ¬ (𝑈 ∪ {⟨dom 𝑈, 1o⟩}) <s (𝑍 ↾ suc dom 𝑈))
Theorem	noinfbnd2 27790*	Bounding law from below for the surreal infimum. Analagous to proposition 4.3 of [Lipparini] p. 6. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ No ) → (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑍 <s 𝑏 ↔ ¬ 𝑇 <s (𝑍 ↾ dom 𝑇)))
Theorem	nosupinfsep 27791*	Given two sets of surreals, a surreal 𝑊 separates them iff its restriction to the maximum of dom 𝑆 and dom 𝑇 separates them. Corollary 4.4 of [Lipparini] p. 7. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ 𝑊 ∈ No ) → ((∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 𝑎 <s 𝑊 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑊 <s 𝑏) ↔ (∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 𝑎 <s (𝑊 ↾ (dom 𝑆 ∪ dom 𝑇)) ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑊 ↾ (dom 𝑆 ∪ dom 𝑇)) <s 𝑏)))
Theorem	noetasuplem1 27792*	Lemma for noeta 27802. Establish that our final surreal really is a surreal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑆 ∪ ((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆) × {1o}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → 𝑍 ∈ No )
Theorem	noetasuplem2 27793*	Lemma for noeta 27802. The restriction of 𝑍 to dom 𝑆 is 𝑆. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑆 ∪ ((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆) × {1o}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝑍 ↾ dom 𝑆) = 𝑆)
Theorem	noetasuplem3 27794*	Lemma for noeta 27802. 𝑍 is an upper bound for 𝐴. Part of Theorem 5.1 of [Lipparini] p. 7-8. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑆 ∪ ((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆) × {1o}))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑋 <s 𝑍)
Theorem	noetasuplem4 27795*	Lemma for noeta 27802. When 𝐴 and 𝐵 are separated, then 𝑍 is a lower bound for 𝐵. Part of Theorem 5.1 of [Lipparini] p. 7-8. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑆 ∪ ((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆) × {1o}))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑎 <s 𝑏) → ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑍 <s 𝑏)
Theorem	noetainflem1 27796*	Lemma for noeta 27802. Establish that this particular construction gives a surreal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑇 ∪ ((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∖ dom 𝑇) × {2o}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → 𝑊 ∈ No )
Theorem	noetainflem2 27797*	Lemma for noeta 27802. The restriction of 𝑊 to the domain of 𝑇 is 𝑇. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑇 ∪ ((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∖ dom 𝑇) × {2o}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝑊 ↾ dom 𝑇) = 𝑇)
Theorem	noetainflem3 27798*	Lemma for noeta 27802. 𝑊 bounds 𝐵 below . (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑇 ∪ ((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∖ dom 𝑇) × {2o}))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑊 <s 𝑌)
Theorem	noetainflem4 27799*	Lemma for noeta 27802. If 𝐴 precedes 𝐵, then 𝑊 is greater than 𝐴. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑇 ∪ ((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∖ dom 𝑇) × {2o}))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑎 <s 𝑏) → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 𝑎 <s 𝑊)
Theorem	noetalem1 27800*	Lemma for noeta 27802. Either 𝑆 or 𝑇 satisfies the final condition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑆 ∪ ((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆) × {1o}))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑇 ∪ ((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐴) ∖ dom 𝑇) × {2o}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑎 <s 𝑏) ∧ (𝑂 ∈ On ∧ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑂)) → ((𝑆 ∈ No ∧ (∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 𝑎 <s 𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑆 <s 𝑏 ∧ ( bday ‘𝑆) ⊆ 𝑂)) ∨ (𝑇 ∈ No ∧ (∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 𝑎 <s 𝑇 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑇 <s 𝑏 ∧ ( bday ‘𝑇) ⊆ 𝑂))))