Theorem bj-bdfindes 16665

Description: Bounded induction (principle of induction for bounded formulas), using explicit substitutions. Constructive proof (from CZF). See the comment of bj-bdfindis 16663 for explanations. From this version, it is easy to prove the bounded version of findes 4707. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
bj-bdfindes.bd	|- BOUNDED ph

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-bdfindes	|- ( ( [. (/) / x ]. ph /\ A. x e. om ( ph -> [. suc x / x ]. ph ) ) -> A. x e. om ph )

Proof of Theorem bj-bdfindes

Dummy variable y is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfv 1577	. . . 4 |- F/ y ph
2		nfv 1577	. . . 4 |- F/ y [. suc x / x ]. ph
3	1, 2	nfim 1621	. . 3 |- F/ y ( ph -> [. suc x / x ]. ph )
4		nfs1v 1992	. . . 4 |- F/ x [ y / x ] ph
5		nfsbc1v 3051	. . . 4 |- F/ x [. suc y / x ]. ph
6	4, 5	nfim 1621	. . 3 |- F/ x ( [ y / x ] ph -> [. suc y / x ]. ph )
7		sbequ12 1819	. . . 4 |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> [ y / x ] ph ) )
8		suceq 4505	. . . . 5 |- ( x = y -> suc x = suc y )
9	8	sbceq1d 3037	. . . 4 |- ( x = y -> ( [. suc x / x ]. ph <-> [. suc y / x ]. ph ) )
10	7, 9	imbi12d 234	. . 3 |- ( x = y -> ( ( ph -> [. suc x / x ]. ph ) <-> ( [ y / x ] ph -> [. suc y / x ]. ph ) ) )
11	3, 6, 10	cbvral 2764	. 2 |- ( A. x e. om ( ph -> [. suc x / x ]. ph ) <-> A. y e. om ( [ y / x ] ph -> [. suc y / x ]. ph ) )
12		bj-bdfindes.bd	. . 3 |- BOUNDED ph
13		nfsbc1v 3051	. . 3 |- F/ x [. (/) / x ]. ph
14		sbceq1a 3042	. . . 4 |- ( x = (/) -> ( ph <-> [. (/) / x ]. ph ) )
15	14	biimprd 158	. . 3 |- ( x = (/) -> ( [. (/) / x ]. ph -> ph ) )
16		sbequ1 1816	. . 3 |- ( x = y -> ( ph -> [ y / x ] ph ) )
17		sbceq1a 3042	. . . 4 |- ( x = suc y -> ( ph <-> [. suc y / x ]. ph ) )
18	17	biimprd 158	. . 3 |- ( x = suc y -> ( [. suc y / x ]. ph -> ph ) )
19	12, 13, 4, 5, 15, 16, 18	bj-bdfindis 16663	. 2 |- ( ( [. (/) / x ]. ph /\ A. y e. om ( [ y / x ] ph -> [. suc y / x ]. ph ) ) -> A. x e. om ph )
20	11, 19	sylan2b 287	1 |- ( ( [. (/) / x ]. ph /\ A. x e. om ( ph -> [. suc x / x ]. ph ) ) -> A. x e. om ph )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   = wceq 1398   [wsb 1810   A.wral 2511   [.wsbc 3032   (/)c0 3496   suc csuc 4468   omcom 4694  BOUNDED wbd 16528

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-io 717  ax-5 1496  ax-7 1497  ax-gen 1498  ax-ie1 1542  ax-ie2 1543  ax-8 1553  ax-10 1554  ax-11 1555  ax-i12 1556  ax-bndl 1558  ax-4 1559  ax-17 1575  ax-i9 1579  ax-ial 1583  ax-i5r 1584  ax-13 2204  ax-14 2205  ax-ext 2213  ax-nul 4220  ax-pr 4305  ax-un 4536  ax-bd0 16529  ax-bdor 16532  ax-bdex 16535  ax-bdeq 16536  ax-bdel 16537  ax-bdsb 16538  ax-bdsep 16600  ax-infvn 16657

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1401  df-nf 1510  df-sb 1811  df-clab 2218  df-cleq 2224  df-clel 2227  df-nfc 2364  df-ral 2516  df-rex 2517  df-rab 2520  df-v 2805  df-sbc 3033  df-dif 3203  df-un 3205  df-in 3207  df-ss 3214  df-nul 3497  df-sn 3679  df-pr 3680  df-uni 3899  df-int 3934  df-suc 4474  df-iom 4695  df-bdc 16557  df-bj-ind 16643

This theorem is referenced by: (None)