Theorem bj-bdfindis 16310

Description: Bounded induction (principle of induction for bounded formulas), using implicit substitutions (the biconditional versions of the hypotheses are implicit substitutions, and we have weakened them to implications). Constructive proof (from CZF). See finds 4692 for a proof of full induction in IZF. From this version, it is easy to prove bounded versions of finds 4692, finds2 4693, finds1 4694. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bj-bdfindis.bd	|- BOUNDED ph
bj-bdfindis.nf0	|- F/ x ps
bj-bdfindis.nf1	|- F/ x ch
bj-bdfindis.nfsuc	|- F/ x th
bj-bdfindis.0	|- ( x = (/) -> ( ps -> ph ) )
bj-bdfindis.1	|- ( x = y -> ( ph -> ch ) )
bj-bdfindis.suc	|- ( x = suc y -> ( th -> ph ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-bdfindis	|- ( ( ps /\ A. y e. om ( ch -> th ) ) -> A. x e. om ph )

Distinct variable groups:   x, y   ph, y

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x)   ps( x, y)   ch( x, y)   th( x, y)

Proof of Theorem bj-bdfindis

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bj-bdfindis.nf0	. . . 4 |- F/ x ps
2		0ex 4211	. . . 4 |- (/) e. _V
3		bj-bdfindis.0	. . . 4 |- ( x = (/) -> ( ps -> ph ) )
4	1, 2, 3	elabf2 16146	. . 3 |- ( ps -> (/) e. { x | ph } )
5		bj-bdfindis.nf1	. . . . . 6 |- F/ x ch
6		bj-bdfindis.1	. . . . . 6 |- ( x = y -> ( ph -> ch ) )
7	5, 6	elabf1 16145	. . . . 5 |- ( y e. { x | ph } -> ch )
8		bj-bdfindis.nfsuc	. . . . . 6 |- F/ x th
9		vex 2802	. . . . . . 7 |- y e. _V
10	9	bj-sucex 16286	. . . . . 6 |- suc y e. _V
11		bj-bdfindis.suc	. . . . . 6 |- ( x = suc y -> ( th -> ph ) )
12	8, 10, 11	elabf2 16146	. . . . 5 |- ( th -> suc y e. { x | ph } )
13	7, 12	imim12i 59	. . . 4 |- ( ( ch -> th ) -> ( y e. { x | ph } -> suc y e. { x | ph } ) )
14	13	ralimi 2593	. . 3 |- ( A. y e. om ( ch -> th ) -> A. y e. om ( y e. { x | ph } -> suc y e. { x | ph } ) )
15		bj-bdfindis.bd	. . . . 5 |- BOUNDED ph
16	15	bdcab 16212	. . . 4 |- BOUNDED { x | ph }
17	16	bdpeano5 16306	. . 3 |- ( ( (/) e. { x | ph } /\ A. y e. om ( y e. { x | ph } -> suc y e. { x | ph } ) ) -> om C_ { x | ph } )
18	4, 14, 17	syl2an 289	. 2 |- ( ( ps /\ A. y e. om ( ch -> th ) ) -> om C_ { x | ph } )
19		ssabral 3295	. 2 |- ( om C_ { x | ph } <-> A. x e. om ph )
20	18, 19	sylib 122	1 |- ( ( ps /\ A. y e. om ( ch -> th ) ) -> A. x e. om ph )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   = wceq 1395   F/wnf 1506   e. wcel 2200   {cab 2215   A.wral 2508   C_ wss 3197   (/)c0 3491   suc csuc 4456   omcom 4682  BOUNDED wbd 16175

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 617  ax-in2 618  ax-io 714  ax-5 1493  ax-7 1494  ax-gen 1495  ax-ie1 1539  ax-ie2 1540  ax-8 1550  ax-10 1551  ax-11 1552  ax-i12 1553  ax-bndl 1555  ax-4 1556  ax-17 1572  ax-i9 1576  ax-ial 1580  ax-i5r 1581  ax-13 2202  ax-14 2203  ax-ext 2211  ax-nul 4210  ax-pr 4293  ax-un 4524  ax-bd0 16176  ax-bdor 16179  ax-bdex 16182  ax-bdeq 16183  ax-bdel 16184  ax-bdsb 16185  ax-bdsep 16247  ax-infvn 16304

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1398  df-nf 1507  df-sb 1809  df-clab 2216  df-cleq 2222  df-clel 2225  df-nfc 2361  df-ral 2513  df-rex 2514  df-rab 2517  df-v 2801  df-dif 3199  df-un 3201  df-in 3203  df-ss 3210  df-nul 3492  df-sn 3672  df-pr 3673  df-uni 3889  df-int 3924  df-suc 4462  df-iom 4683  df-bdc 16204  df-bj-ind 16290

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-bdfindisg  16311  bj-bdfindes  16312  bj-nn0suc0  16313