Theorem bj-bdfindis 16663

Description: Bounded induction (principle of induction for bounded formulas), using implicit substitutions (the biconditional versions of the hypotheses are implicit substitutions, and we have weakened them to implications). Constructive proof (from CZF). See finds 4704 for a proof of full induction in IZF. From this version, it is easy to prove bounded versions of finds 4704, finds2 4705, finds1 4706. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bj-bdfindis.bd	⊢ BOUNDED 𝜑
bj-bdfindis.nf0	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
bj-bdfindis.nf1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒
bj-bdfindis.nfsuc	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜃
bj-bdfindis.0	⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜓 → 𝜑))
bj-bdfindis.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜒))
bj-bdfindis.suc	⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜃 → 𝜑))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-bdfindis	⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ω (𝜒 → 𝜃)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω 𝜑)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦   𝜑,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜒(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜃(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem bj-bdfindis

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bj-bdfindis.nf0	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
2		0ex 4221	. . . 4 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
3		bj-bdfindis.0	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜓 → 𝜑))
4	1, 2, 3	elabf2 16500	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜓 → ∅ ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
5		bj-bdfindis.nf1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒
6		bj-bdfindis.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜒))
7	5, 6	elabf1 16499	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} → 𝜒)
8		bj-bdfindis.nfsuc	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜃
9		vex 2806	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
10	9	bj-sucex 16639	. . . . . 6 ⊢ suc 𝑦 ∈ V
11		bj-bdfindis.suc	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜃 → 𝜑))
12	8, 10, 11	elabf2 16500	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜃 → suc 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
13	7, 12	imim12i 59	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜒 → 𝜃) → (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} → suc 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}))
14	13	ralimi 2596	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ ω (𝜒 → 𝜃) → ∀𝑦 ∈ ω (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} → suc 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}))
15		bj-bdfindis.bd	. . . . 5 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝜑
16	15	bdcab 16565	. . . 4 ⊢ BOUNDED {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}
17	16	bdpeano5 16659	. . 3 ⊢ ((∅ ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ω (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} → suc 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})) → ω ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
18	4, 14, 17	syl2an 289	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ω (𝜒 → 𝜃)) → ω ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
19		ssabral 3299	. 2 ⊢ (ω ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ω 𝜑)
20	18, 19	sylib 122	1 ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ω (𝜒 → 𝜃)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω 𝜑)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   = wceq 1398  Ⅎwnf 1509   ∈ wcel 2202  {cab 2217  ∀wral 2511   ⊆ wss 3201  ∅c0 3496  suc csuc 4468  ωcom 4694  BOUNDED wbd 16528

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-io 717  ax-5 1496  ax-7 1497  ax-gen 1498  ax-ie1 1542  ax-ie2 1543  ax-8 1553  ax-10 1554  ax-11 1555  ax-i12 1556  ax-bndl 1558  ax-4 1559  ax-17 1575  ax-i9 1579  ax-ial 1583  ax-i5r 1584  ax-13 2204  ax-14 2205  ax-ext 2213  ax-nul 4220  ax-pr 4305  ax-un 4536  ax-bd0 16529  ax-bdor 16532  ax-bdex 16535  ax-bdeq 16536  ax-bdel 16537  ax-bdsb 16538  ax-bdsep 16600  ax-infvn 16657

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1401  df-nf 1510  df-sb 1811  df-clab 2218  df-cleq 2224  df-clel 2227  df-nfc 2364  df-ral 2516  df-rex 2517  df-rab 2520  df-v 2805  df-dif 3203  df-un 3205  df-in 3207  df-ss 3214  df-nul 3497  df-sn 3679  df-pr 3680  df-uni 3899  df-int 3934  df-suc 4474  df-iom 4695  df-bdc 16557  df-bj-ind 16643

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-bdfindisg  16664  bj-bdfindes  16665  bj-nn0suc0  16666