Theorem finds2 4705

Description: Principle of Finite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first three hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last two are the basis and the induction step. Theorem Schema 22 of [Suppes] p. 136. (Contributed by NM, 29-Nov-2002.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
finds2.1	|- ( x = (/) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
finds2.2	|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ch ) )
finds2.3	|- ( x = suc y -> ( ph <-> th ) )
finds2.4	|- ( ta -> ps )
finds2.5	|- ( y e. om -> ( ta -> ( ch -> th ) ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
finds2	|- ( x e. om -> ( ta -> ph ) )

Distinct variable groups:   x, y, ta   ps, x   ch, x   th, x   ph, y

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x)   ps( y)   ch( y)   th( y)

Proof of Theorem finds2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		finds2.4	. . . . 5 |- ( ta -> ps )
2		0ex 4221	. . . . . 6 |- (/) e. _V
3		finds2.1	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x = (/) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
4	3	imbi2d 230	. . . . . 6 |- ( x = (/) -> ( ( ta -> ph ) <-> ( ta -> ps ) ) )
5	2, 4	elab 2951	. . . . 5 |- ( (/) e. { x | ( ta -> ph ) } <-> ( ta -> ps ) )
6	1, 5	mpbir 146	. . . 4 |- (/) e. { x | ( ta -> ph ) }
7		finds2.5	. . . . . . 7 |- ( y e. om -> ( ta -> ( ch -> th ) ) )
8	7	a2d 26	. . . . . 6 |- ( y e. om -> ( ( ta -> ch ) -> ( ta -> th ) ) )
9		vex 2806	. . . . . . 7 |- y e. _V
10		finds2.2	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ch ) )
11	10	imbi2d 230	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x = y -> ( ( ta -> ph ) <-> ( ta -> ch ) ) )
12	9, 11	elab 2951	. . . . . 6 |- ( y e. { x | ( ta -> ph ) } <-> ( ta -> ch ) )
13	9	sucex 4603	. . . . . . 7 |- suc y e. _V
14		finds2.3	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( x = suc y -> ( ph <-> th ) )
15	14	imbi2d 230	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x = suc y -> ( ( ta -> ph ) <-> ( ta -> th ) ) )
16	13, 15	elab 2951	. . . . . 6 |- ( suc y e. { x | ( ta -> ph ) } <-> ( ta -> th ) )
17	8, 12, 16	3imtr4g 205	. . . . 5 |- ( y e. om -> ( y e. { x | ( ta -> ph ) } -> suc y e. { x | ( ta -> ph ) } ) )
18	17	rgen 2586	. . . 4 |- A. y e. om ( y e. { x | ( ta -> ph ) } -> suc y e. { x | ( ta -> ph ) } )
19		peano5 4702	. . . 4 |- ( ( (/) e. { x | ( ta -> ph ) } /\ A. y e. om ( y e. { x | ( ta -> ph ) } -> suc y e. { x | ( ta -> ph ) } ) ) -> om C_ { x | ( ta -> ph ) } )
20	6, 18, 19	mp2an 426	. . 3 |- om C_ { x | ( ta -> ph ) }
21	20	sseli 3224	. 2 |- ( x e. om -> x e. { x | ( ta -> ph ) } )
22		abid 2219	. 2 |- ( x e. { x | ( ta -> ph ) } <-> ( ta -> ph ) )
23	21, 22	sylib 122	1 |- ( x e. om -> ( ta -> ph ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   <-> wb 105   = wceq 1398   e. wcel 2202   {cab 2217   A.wral 2511   C_ wss 3201   (/)c0 3496   suc csuc 4468   omcom 4694

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-io 717  ax-5 1496  ax-7 1497  ax-gen 1498  ax-ie1 1542  ax-ie2 1543  ax-8 1553  ax-10 1554  ax-11 1555  ax-i12 1556  ax-bndl 1558  ax-4 1559  ax-17 1575  ax-i9 1579  ax-ial 1583  ax-i5r 1584  ax-13 2204  ax-14 2205  ax-ext 2213  ax-sep 4212  ax-nul 4220  ax-pow 4270  ax-pr 4305  ax-un 4536  ax-iinf 4692

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1007  df-tru 1401  df-nf 1510  df-sb 1811  df-clab 2218  df-cleq 2224  df-clel 2227  df-nfc 2364  df-ral 2516  df-rex 2517  df-v 2805  df-dif 3203  df-un 3205  df-in 3207  df-ss 3214  df-nul 3497  df-pw 3658  df-sn 3679  df-pr 3680  df-uni 3899  df-int 3934  df-suc 4474  df-iom 4695

This theorem is referenced by:  finds1  4706  frecrdg  6617  nnacl  6691  nnmcl  6692  nnacom  6695  nnaass  6696  nndi  6697  nnmass  6698  nnmsucr  6699  nnmcom  6700  nnsucsssuc  6703  nntri3or  6704  nnaordi  6719  nnaword  6722  nnmordi  6727  nnaordex  6739  fiintim  7166  prarloclem3  7777  frec2uzuzd  10727  frec2uzrdg  10734