Theorem finds2 4649

Description: Principle of Finite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first three hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last two are the basis and the induction step. Theorem Schema 22 of [Suppes] p. 136. (Contributed by NM, 29-Nov-2002.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
finds2.1	|- ( x = (/) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
finds2.2	|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ch ) )
finds2.3	|- ( x = suc y -> ( ph <-> th ) )
finds2.4	|- ( ta -> ps )
finds2.5	|- ( y e. om -> ( ta -> ( ch -> th ) ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
finds2	|- ( x e. om -> ( ta -> ph ) )

Distinct variable groups:   x, y, ta   ps, x   ch, x   th, x   ph, y

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x)   ps( y)   ch( y)   th( y)

Proof of Theorem finds2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		finds2.4	. . . . 5 |- ( ta -> ps )
2		0ex 4171	. . . . . 6 |- (/) e. _V
3		finds2.1	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x = (/) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
4	3	imbi2d 230	. . . . . 6 |- ( x = (/) -> ( ( ta -> ph ) <-> ( ta -> ps ) ) )
5	2, 4	elab 2917	. . . . 5 |- ( (/) e. { x | ( ta -> ph ) } <-> ( ta -> ps ) )
6	1, 5	mpbir 146	. . . 4 |- (/) e. { x | ( ta -> ph ) }
7		finds2.5	. . . . . . 7 |- ( y e. om -> ( ta -> ( ch -> th ) ) )
8	7	a2d 26	. . . . . 6 |- ( y e. om -> ( ( ta -> ch ) -> ( ta -> th ) ) )
9		vex 2775	. . . . . . 7 |- y e. _V
10		finds2.2	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ch ) )
11	10	imbi2d 230	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x = y -> ( ( ta -> ph ) <-> ( ta -> ch ) ) )
12	9, 11	elab 2917	. . . . . 6 |- ( y e. { x | ( ta -> ph ) } <-> ( ta -> ch ) )
13	9	sucex 4547	. . . . . . 7 |- suc y e. _V
14		finds2.3	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( x = suc y -> ( ph <-> th ) )
15	14	imbi2d 230	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x = suc y -> ( ( ta -> ph ) <-> ( ta -> th ) ) )
16	13, 15	elab 2917	. . . . . 6 |- ( suc y e. { x | ( ta -> ph ) } <-> ( ta -> th ) )
17	8, 12, 16	3imtr4g 205	. . . . 5 |- ( y e. om -> ( y e. { x | ( ta -> ph ) } -> suc y e. { x | ( ta -> ph ) } ) )
18	17	rgen 2559	. . . 4 |- A. y e. om ( y e. { x | ( ta -> ph ) } -> suc y e. { x | ( ta -> ph ) } )
19		peano5 4646	. . . 4 |- ( ( (/) e. { x | ( ta -> ph ) } /\ A. y e. om ( y e. { x | ( ta -> ph ) } -> suc y e. { x | ( ta -> ph ) } ) ) -> om C_ { x | ( ta -> ph ) } )
20	6, 18, 19	mp2an 426	. . 3 |- om C_ { x | ( ta -> ph ) }
21	20	sseli 3189	. 2 |- ( x e. om -> x e. { x | ( ta -> ph ) } )
22		abid 2193	. 2 |- ( x e. { x | ( ta -> ph ) } <-> ( ta -> ph ) )
23	21, 22	sylib 122	1 |- ( x e. om -> ( ta -> ph ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   <-> wb 105   = wceq 1373   e. wcel 2176   {cab 2191   A.wral 2484   C_ wss 3166   (/)c0 3460   suc csuc 4412   omcom 4638

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 711  ax-5 1470  ax-7 1471  ax-gen 1472  ax-ie1 1516  ax-ie2 1517  ax-8 1527  ax-10 1528  ax-11 1529  ax-i12 1530  ax-bndl 1532  ax-4 1533  ax-17 1549  ax-i9 1553  ax-ial 1557  ax-i5r 1558  ax-13 2178  ax-14 2179  ax-ext 2187  ax-sep 4162  ax-nul 4170  ax-pow 4218  ax-pr 4253  ax-un 4480  ax-iinf 4636

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 983  df-tru 1376  df-nf 1484  df-sb 1786  df-clab 2192  df-cleq 2198  df-clel 2201  df-nfc 2337  df-ral 2489  df-rex 2490  df-v 2774  df-dif 3168  df-un 3170  df-in 3172  df-ss 3179  df-nul 3461  df-pw 3618  df-sn 3639  df-pr 3640  df-uni 3851  df-int 3886  df-suc 4418  df-iom 4639

This theorem is referenced by:  finds1  4650  frecrdg  6494  nnacl  6566  nnmcl  6567  nnacom  6570  nnaass  6571  nndi  6572  nnmass  6573  nnmsucr  6574  nnmcom  6575  nnsucsssuc  6578  nntri3or  6579  nnaordi  6594  nnaword  6597  nnmordi  6602  nnaordex  6614  fiintim  7028  prarloclem3  7610  frec2uzuzd  10547  frec2uzrdg  10554