Theorem eroprf2 6903

Description: Functionality of an operation defined on equivalence classes. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
eropr2.1	|- J = ( A /. .~ )
eropr2.2	|- .+^ = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | E. p e. A E. q e. A ( ( x = [ p ] .~ /\ y = [ q ] .~ ) /\ z = [ ( p .+ q ) ] .~ ) }
eropr2.3	|- ( ph -> .~ e. X )
eropr2.4	|- ( ph -> .~ Er U )
eropr2.5	|- ( ph -> A C_ U )
eropr2.6	|- ( ph -> .+ : ( A X. A ) --> A )
eropr2.7	|- ( ( ph /\ ( ( r e. A /\ s e. A ) /\ ( t e. A /\ u e. A ) ) ) -> ( ( r .~ s /\ t .~ u ) -> ( r .+ t ) .~ ( s .+ u ) ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
eroprf2	|- ( ph -> .+^ : ( J X. J ) --> J )

Distinct variable groups:   q, p, r, s, t, u, x, y, z, A   X, p, q, r, s, t, u, z   .+ , p, q, r, s, t, u, x, y, z   .~ , p, q, r, s, t, u, x, y, z   J, p, q, x, y, z   ph, p, q, r, s, t, u, x, y, z

Allowed substitution hints:   .+^ ( x, y, z, u, t, s, r, q, p)   U( x, y, z, u, t, s, r, q, p)   J( u, t, s, r)   X( x, y)

Proof of Theorem eroprf2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eropr2.1	. 2 |- J = ( A /. .~ )
2		eropr2.3	. 2 |- ( ph -> .~ e. X )
3		eropr2.4	. 2 |- ( ph -> .~ Er U )
4		eropr2.5	. 2 |- ( ph -> A C_ U )
5		eropr2.6	. 2 |- ( ph -> .+ : ( A X. A ) --> A )
6		eropr2.7	. 2 |- ( ( ph /\ ( ( r e. A /\ s e. A ) /\ ( t e. A /\ u e. A ) ) ) -> ( ( r .~ s /\ t .~ u ) -> ( r .+ t ) .~ ( s .+ u ) ) )
7		eropr2.2	. 2 |- .+^ = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | E. p e. A E. q e. A ( ( x = [ p ] .~ /\ y = [ q ] .~ ) /\ z = [ ( p .+ q ) ] .~ ) }
8	1, 1, 2, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 5, 6, 7, 2, 2, 1	eroprf 6902	1 |- ( ph -> .+^ : ( J X. J ) --> J )

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   = wceq 1402   e. wcel 2209   E.wrex 2529   C_ wss 3220   class class class wbr 4130   X. cxp 4772   -->wf 5373  (class class class)co 6085   {coprab 6086   Er wer 6804   [cec 6805   /.cqs 6806

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-sep 4249  ax-pow 4311  ax-pr 4346  ax-un 4578

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1011  df-tru 1405  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-eu 2089  df-mo 2090  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ral 2533  df-rex 2534  df-rab 2537  df-v 2823  df-sbc 3052  df-csb 3148  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-pw 3690  df-sn 3715  df-pr 3716  df-op 3718  df-uni 3936  df-iun 4014  df-br 4131  df-opab 4193  df-mpt 4194  df-id 4438  df-xp 4780  df-rel 4781  df-cnv 4782  df-co 4783  df-dm 4784  df-rn 4785  df-res 4786  df-ima 4787  df-iota 5337  df-fun 5379  df-fn 5380  df-f 5381  df-fv 5385  df-ov 6088  df-oprab 6089  df-mpo 6090  df-1st 6374  df-2nd 6375  df-er 6807  df-ec 6809  df-qs 6813

This theorem is used by: (None)