Theorem mnd4g 13070

Description: Commutative/associative law for commutative monoids, with an explicit commutativity hypothesis. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
mndcl.b	|- B = ( Base ` G )
mndcl.p	|- .+ = ( +g ` G )
mnd4g.1	|- ( ph -> G e. Mnd )
mnd4g.2	|- ( ph -> X e. B )
mnd4g.3	|- ( ph -> Y e. B )
mnd4g.4	|- ( ph -> Z e. B )
mnd4g.5	|- ( ph -> W e. B )
mnd4g.6	|- ( ph -> ( Y .+ Z ) = ( Z .+ Y ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mnd4g	|- ( ph -> ( ( X .+ Y ) .+ ( Z .+ W ) ) = ( ( X .+ Z ) .+ ( Y .+ W ) ) )

Proof of Theorem mnd4g

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		mndcl.b	. . . 4 |- B = ( Base ` G )
2		mndcl.p	. . . 4 |- .+ = ( +g ` G )
3		mnd4g.1	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> G e. Mnd )
4		mnd4g.3	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> Y e. B )
5		mnd4g.4	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> Z e. B )
6		mnd4g.5	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> W e. B )
7		mnd4g.6	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( Y .+ Z ) = ( Z .+ Y ) )
8	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7	mnd12g 13069	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( Y .+ ( Z .+ W ) ) = ( Z .+ ( Y .+ W ) ) )
9	8	oveq2d 5938	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( X .+ ( Y .+ ( Z .+ W ) ) ) = ( X .+ ( Z .+ ( Y .+ W ) ) ) )
10		mnd4g.2	. . 3 |- ( ph -> X e. B )
11	1, 2	mndcl 13064	. . . 4 |- ( ( G e. Mnd /\ Z e. B /\ W e. B ) -> ( Z .+ W ) e. B )
12	3, 5, 6, 11	syl3anc 1249	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( Z .+ W ) e. B )
13	1, 2	mndass 13065	. . 3 |- ( ( G e. Mnd /\ ( X e. B /\ Y e. B /\ ( Z .+ W ) e. B ) ) -> ( ( X .+ Y ) .+ ( Z .+ W ) ) = ( X .+ ( Y .+ ( Z .+ W ) ) ) )
14	3, 10, 4, 12, 13	syl13anc 1251	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( ( X .+ Y ) .+ ( Z .+ W ) ) = ( X .+ ( Y .+ ( Z .+ W ) ) ) )
15	1, 2	mndcl 13064	. . . 4 |- ( ( G e. Mnd /\ Y e. B /\ W e. B ) -> ( Y .+ W ) e. B )
16	3, 4, 6, 15	syl3anc 1249	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( Y .+ W ) e. B )
17	1, 2	mndass 13065	. . 3 |- ( ( G e. Mnd /\ ( X e. B /\ Z e. B /\ ( Y .+ W ) e. B ) ) -> ( ( X .+ Z ) .+ ( Y .+ W ) ) = ( X .+ ( Z .+ ( Y .+ W ) ) ) )
18	3, 10, 5, 16, 17	syl13anc 1251	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( ( X .+ Z ) .+ ( Y .+ W ) ) = ( X .+ ( Z .+ ( Y .+ W ) ) ) )
19	9, 14, 18	3eqtr4d 2239	1 |- ( ph -> ( ( X .+ Y ) .+ ( Z .+ W ) ) = ( ( X .+ Z ) .+ ( Y .+ W ) ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   = wceq 1364   e. wcel 2167   ` cfv 5258  (class class class)co 5922   Basecbs 12678   +g cplusg 12755   Mndcmnd 13057

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1461  ax-7 1462  ax-gen 1463  ax-ie1 1507  ax-ie2 1508  ax-8 1518  ax-10 1519  ax-11 1520  ax-i12 1521  ax-bndl 1523  ax-4 1524  ax-17 1540  ax-i9 1544  ax-ial 1548  ax-i5r 1549  ax-13 2169  ax-14 2170  ax-ext 2178  ax-sep 4151  ax-pow 4207  ax-pr 4242  ax-un 4468  ax-cnex 7970  ax-resscn 7971  ax-1re 7973  ax-addrcl 7976

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1475  df-sb 1777  df-eu 2048  df-mo 2049  df-clab 2183  df-cleq 2189  df-clel 2192  df-nfc 2328  df-ral 2480  df-rex 2481  df-rab 2484  df-v 2765  df-sbc 2990  df-un 3161  df-in 3163  df-ss 3170  df-pw 3607  df-sn 3628  df-pr 3629  df-op 3631  df-uni 3840  df-int 3875  df-br 4034  df-opab 4095  df-mpt 4096  df-id 4328  df-xp 4669  df-rel 4670  df-cnv 4671  df-co 4672  df-dm 4673  df-rn 4674  df-res 4675  df-iota 5219  df-fun 5260  df-fn 5261  df-fv 5266  df-ov 5925  df-inn 8991  df-2 9049  df-ndx 12681  df-slot 12682  df-base 12684  df-plusg 12768  df-mgm 12999  df-sgrp 13045  df-mnd 13058

This theorem is referenced by:  cmn4  13435