Theorem mnd4g 13376

Description: Commutative/associative law for commutative monoids, with an explicit commutativity hypothesis. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
mndcl.b	|- B = ( Base ` G )
mndcl.p	|- .+ = ( +g ` G )
mnd4g.1	|- ( ph -> G e. Mnd )
mnd4g.2	|- ( ph -> X e. B )
mnd4g.3	|- ( ph -> Y e. B )
mnd4g.4	|- ( ph -> Z e. B )
mnd4g.5	|- ( ph -> W e. B )
mnd4g.6	|- ( ph -> ( Y .+ Z ) = ( Z .+ Y ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mnd4g	|- ( ph -> ( ( X .+ Y ) .+ ( Z .+ W ) ) = ( ( X .+ Z ) .+ ( Y .+ W ) ) )

Proof of Theorem mnd4g

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		mndcl.b	. . . 4 |- B = ( Base ` G )
2		mndcl.p	. . . 4 |- .+ = ( +g ` G )
3		mnd4g.1	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> G e. Mnd )
4		mnd4g.3	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> Y e. B )
5		mnd4g.4	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> Z e. B )
6		mnd4g.5	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> W e. B )
7		mnd4g.6	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( Y .+ Z ) = ( Z .+ Y ) )
8	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7	mnd12g 13375	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( Y .+ ( Z .+ W ) ) = ( Z .+ ( Y .+ W ) ) )
9	8	oveq2d 5983	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( X .+ ( Y .+ ( Z .+ W ) ) ) = ( X .+ ( Z .+ ( Y .+ W ) ) ) )
10		mnd4g.2	. . 3 |- ( ph -> X e. B )
11	1, 2	mndcl 13370	. . . 4 |- ( ( G e. Mnd /\ Z e. B /\ W e. B ) -> ( Z .+ W ) e. B )
12	3, 5, 6, 11	syl3anc 1250	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( Z .+ W ) e. B )
13	1, 2	mndass 13371	. . 3 |- ( ( G e. Mnd /\ ( X e. B /\ Y e. B /\ ( Z .+ W ) e. B ) ) -> ( ( X .+ Y ) .+ ( Z .+ W ) ) = ( X .+ ( Y .+ ( Z .+ W ) ) ) )
14	3, 10, 4, 12, 13	syl13anc 1252	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( ( X .+ Y ) .+ ( Z .+ W ) ) = ( X .+ ( Y .+ ( Z .+ W ) ) ) )
15	1, 2	mndcl 13370	. . . 4 |- ( ( G e. Mnd /\ Y e. B /\ W e. B ) -> ( Y .+ W ) e. B )
16	3, 4, 6, 15	syl3anc 1250	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( Y .+ W ) e. B )
17	1, 2	mndass 13371	. . 3 |- ( ( G e. Mnd /\ ( X e. B /\ Z e. B /\ ( Y .+ W ) e. B ) ) -> ( ( X .+ Z ) .+ ( Y .+ W ) ) = ( X .+ ( Z .+ ( Y .+ W ) ) ) )
18	3, 10, 5, 16, 17	syl13anc 1252	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( ( X .+ Z ) .+ ( Y .+ W ) ) = ( X .+ ( Z .+ ( Y .+ W ) ) ) )
19	9, 14, 18	3eqtr4d 2250	1 |- ( ph -> ( ( X .+ Y ) .+ ( Z .+ W ) ) = ( ( X .+ Z ) .+ ( Y .+ W ) ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   = wceq 1373   e. wcel 2178   ` cfv 5290  (class class class)co 5967   Basecbs 12947   +g cplusg 13024   Mndcmnd 13363

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 711  ax-5 1471  ax-7 1472  ax-gen 1473  ax-ie1 1517  ax-ie2 1518  ax-8 1528  ax-10 1529  ax-11 1530  ax-i12 1531  ax-bndl 1533  ax-4 1534  ax-17 1550  ax-i9 1554  ax-ial 1558  ax-i5r 1559  ax-13 2180  ax-14 2181  ax-ext 2189  ax-sep 4178  ax-pow 4234  ax-pr 4269  ax-un 4498  ax-cnex 8051  ax-resscn 8052  ax-1re 8054  ax-addrcl 8057

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 983  df-tru 1376  df-nf 1485  df-sb 1787  df-eu 2058  df-mo 2059  df-clab 2194  df-cleq 2200  df-clel 2203  df-nfc 2339  df-ral 2491  df-rex 2492  df-rab 2495  df-v 2778  df-sbc 3006  df-un 3178  df-in 3180  df-ss 3187  df-pw 3628  df-sn 3649  df-pr 3650  df-op 3652  df-uni 3865  df-int 3900  df-br 4060  df-opab 4122  df-mpt 4123  df-id 4358  df-xp 4699  df-rel 4700  df-cnv 4701  df-co 4702  df-dm 4703  df-rn 4704  df-res 4705  df-iota 5251  df-fun 5292  df-fn 5293  df-fv 5298  df-ov 5970  df-inn 9072  df-2 9130  df-ndx 12950  df-slot 12951  df-base 12953  df-plusg 13037  df-mgm 13303  df-sgrp 13349  df-mnd 13364

This theorem is referenced by:  cmn4  13756