Theorem mnd4g 13010

Description: Commutative/associative law for commutative monoids, with an explicit commutativity hypothesis. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
mndcl.b	|- B = ( Base ` G )
mndcl.p	|- .+ = ( +g ` G )
mnd4g.1	|- ( ph -> G e. Mnd )
mnd4g.2	|- ( ph -> X e. B )
mnd4g.3	|- ( ph -> Y e. B )
mnd4g.4	|- ( ph -> Z e. B )
mnd4g.5	|- ( ph -> W e. B )
mnd4g.6	|- ( ph -> ( Y .+ Z ) = ( Z .+ Y ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mnd4g	|- ( ph -> ( ( X .+ Y ) .+ ( Z .+ W ) ) = ( ( X .+ Z ) .+ ( Y .+ W ) ) )

Proof of Theorem mnd4g

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		mndcl.b	. . . 4 |- B = ( Base ` G )
2		mndcl.p	. . . 4 |- .+ = ( +g ` G )
3		mnd4g.1	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> G e. Mnd )
4		mnd4g.3	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> Y e. B )
5		mnd4g.4	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> Z e. B )
6		mnd4g.5	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> W e. B )
7		mnd4g.6	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( Y .+ Z ) = ( Z .+ Y ) )
8	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7	mnd12g 13009	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( Y .+ ( Z .+ W ) ) = ( Z .+ ( Y .+ W ) ) )
9	8	oveq2d 5934	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( X .+ ( Y .+ ( Z .+ W ) ) ) = ( X .+ ( Z .+ ( Y .+ W ) ) ) )
10		mnd4g.2	. . 3 |- ( ph -> X e. B )
11	1, 2	mndcl 13004	. . . 4 |- ( ( G e. Mnd /\ Z e. B /\ W e. B ) -> ( Z .+ W ) e. B )
12	3, 5, 6, 11	syl3anc 1249	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( Z .+ W ) e. B )
13	1, 2	mndass 13005	. . 3 |- ( ( G e. Mnd /\ ( X e. B /\ Y e. B /\ ( Z .+ W ) e. B ) ) -> ( ( X .+ Y ) .+ ( Z .+ W ) ) = ( X .+ ( Y .+ ( Z .+ W ) ) ) )
14	3, 10, 4, 12, 13	syl13anc 1251	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( ( X .+ Y ) .+ ( Z .+ W ) ) = ( X .+ ( Y .+ ( Z .+ W ) ) ) )
15	1, 2	mndcl 13004	. . . 4 |- ( ( G e. Mnd /\ Y e. B /\ W e. B ) -> ( Y .+ W ) e. B )
16	3, 4, 6, 15	syl3anc 1249	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( Y .+ W ) e. B )
17	1, 2	mndass 13005	. . 3 |- ( ( G e. Mnd /\ ( X e. B /\ Z e. B /\ ( Y .+ W ) e. B ) ) -> ( ( X .+ Z ) .+ ( Y .+ W ) ) = ( X .+ ( Z .+ ( Y .+ W ) ) ) )
18	3, 10, 5, 16, 17	syl13anc 1251	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( ( X .+ Z ) .+ ( Y .+ W ) ) = ( X .+ ( Z .+ ( Y .+ W ) ) ) )
19	9, 14, 18	3eqtr4d 2236	1 |- ( ph -> ( ( X .+ Y ) .+ ( Z .+ W ) ) = ( ( X .+ Z ) .+ ( Y .+ W ) ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   = wceq 1364   e. wcel 2164   ` cfv 5254  (class class class)co 5918   Basecbs 12618   +g cplusg 12695   Mndcmnd 12997

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1458  ax-7 1459  ax-gen 1460  ax-ie1 1504  ax-ie2 1505  ax-8 1515  ax-10 1516  ax-11 1517  ax-i12 1518  ax-bndl 1520  ax-4 1521  ax-17 1537  ax-i9 1541  ax-ial 1545  ax-i5r 1546  ax-13 2166  ax-14 2167  ax-ext 2175  ax-sep 4147  ax-pow 4203  ax-pr 4238  ax-un 4464  ax-cnex 7963  ax-resscn 7964  ax-1re 7966  ax-addrcl 7969

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1472  df-sb 1774  df-eu 2045  df-mo 2046  df-clab 2180  df-cleq 2186  df-clel 2189  df-nfc 2325  df-ral 2477  df-rex 2478  df-rab 2481  df-v 2762  df-sbc 2986  df-un 3157  df-in 3159  df-ss 3166  df-pw 3603  df-sn 3624  df-pr 3625  df-op 3627  df-uni 3836  df-int 3871  df-br 4030  df-opab 4091  df-mpt 4092  df-id 4324  df-xp 4665  df-rel 4666  df-cnv 4667  df-co 4668  df-dm 4669  df-rn 4670  df-res 4671  df-iota 5215  df-fun 5256  df-fn 5257  df-fv 5262  df-ov 5921  df-inn 8983  df-2 9041  df-ndx 12621  df-slot 12622  df-base 12624  df-plusg 12708  df-mgm 12939  df-sgrp 12985  df-mnd 12998

This theorem is referenced by:  cmn4  13375