Theorem dcan2 940

Description: A conjunction of two decidable propositions is decidable, expressed in a curried form as compared to dcan 939. This is deprecated; it's trivial to recreate with ex 115, but it's here in case someone is using this older form. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Apr-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dcan2	⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (DECID 𝜓 → DECID (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))

Proof of Theorem dcan2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dcan 939	. 2 ⊢ ((DECID 𝜑 ∧ DECID 𝜓) → DECID (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
2	1	ex 115	1 ⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (DECID 𝜓 → DECID (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104  DECID wdc 839

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 617  ax-in2 618  ax-io 714

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-dc 840

This theorem is referenced by:  pcmptdvds  12908  1arith  12930  ctiunctlemudc  13048  nninfdclemp1  13061  lgsval  15723  lgscllem  15726  lgsneg  15743  lgsdir  15754  lgsdi  15756  lgsne0  15757  nninfsellemdc  16548