Theorem inecmo2 38551

Description: Equivalence of a double restricted universal quantification and a restricted "at most one" inside a universal quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 29-May-2018.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 2-Sep-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
inecmo2	⊢ ((∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) = ∅) ∧ Rel 𝑅) ↔ (∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ Rel 𝑅))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑢,𝐴,𝑣,𝑥   𝑢,𝑅,𝑣,𝑥

Proof of Theorem inecmo2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		id 22	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑣 → 𝑢 = 𝑣)
2	1	inecmo 38550	. 2 ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢𝑅𝑥))
3	2	pm5.32ri 575	1 ⊢ ((∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) = ∅) ∧ Rel 𝑅) ↔ (∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ Rel 𝑅))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∨ wo 847  ∀wal 1539   = wceq 1541  ∀wral 3051  ∃*wrmo 3349   ∩ cin 3900  ∅c0 4285   class class class wbr 5098  Rel wrel 5629  [cec 8633

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-11 2162  ax-ext 2708  ax-sep 5241  ax-nul 5251  ax-pr 5377

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2539  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2811  df-ral 3052  df-rex 3061  df-rmo 3350  df-rab 3400  df-v 3442  df-dif 3904  df-un 3906  df-in 3908  df-ss 3918  df-nul 4286  df-if 4480  df-sn 4581  df-pr 4583  df-op 4587  df-br 5099  df-opab 5161  df-xp 5630  df-rel 5631  df-cnv 5632  df-dm 5634  df-rn 5635  df-res 5636  df-ima 5637  df-ec 8637

This theorem is referenced by:  inecmo3  38564  dfeldisj5  38990