Theorem inecmo2 39025

Description: Equivalence of a double restricted universal quantification and a restricted "at most one" inside a universal quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 29-May-2018.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 2-Sep-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
inecmo2	⊢ ((∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) = ∅) ∧ Rel 𝑅) ↔ (∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ Rel 𝑅))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑢,𝐴,𝑣,𝑥   𝑢,𝑅,𝑣,𝑥

Proof of Theorem inecmo2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		id 23	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑣 → 𝑢 = 𝑣)
2	1	inecmo 39024	. 2 ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢𝑅𝑥))
3	2	pm5.32ri 585	1 ⊢ ((∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) = ∅) ∧ Rel 𝑅) ↔ (∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ Rel 𝑅))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   ∨ wo 860  ∀wal 1568   = wceq 1570  ∀wral 3079  ∃*wrmo 3368   ∩ cin 3904  ∅c0 4286   class class class wbr 5109  Rel wrel 5666  [cec 8688

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-11 2192  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5257  ax-pr 5404

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-sb 2097  df-mo 2567  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rmo 3369  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-dif 3908  df-un 3910  df-in 3912  df-ss 3922  df-nul 4287  df-if 4488  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-br 5110  df-opab 5174  df-xp 5667  df-rel 5668  df-cnv 5669  df-dm 5671  df-rn 5672  df-res 5673  df-ima 5674  df-ec 8692

This theorem is referenced by:  inecmo3  39038  dfeldisj5  39482