Theorem inecmo2 38723

Description: Equivalence of a double restricted universal quantification and a restricted "at most one" inside a universal quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 29-May-2018.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 2-Sep-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
inecmo2	⊢ ((∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) = ∅) ∧ Rel 𝑅) ↔ (∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ Rel 𝑅))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑢,𝐴,𝑣,𝑥   𝑢,𝑅,𝑣,𝑥

Proof of Theorem inecmo2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		id 22	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑣 → 𝑢 = 𝑣)
2	1	inecmo 38722	. 2 ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢𝑅𝑥))
3	2	pm5.32ri 580	1 ⊢ ((∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) = ∅) ∧ Rel 𝑅) ↔ (∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ Rel 𝑅))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 207   ∧ wa 396   ∨ wo 853  ∀wal 1545   = wceq 1547  ∀wral 3053  ∃*wrmo 3343   ∩ cin 3882  ∅c0 4261   class class class wbr 5072  Rel wrel 5623  [cec 8631

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1802  ax-4 1816  ax-5 1917  ax-6 1974  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2121  ax-9 2129  ax-11 2168  ax-ext 2711  ax-sep 5218  ax-pr 5362

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 208  df-an 397  df-or 854  df-3an 1094  df-tru 1550  df-fal 1560  df-ex 1787  df-sb 2074  df-mo 2543  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2731  df-clel 2814  df-ral 3054  df-rex 3064  df-rmo 3344  df-rab 3392  df-v 3433  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-nul 4262  df-if 4455  df-sn 4556  df-pr 4558  df-op 4562  df-br 5073  df-opab 5135  df-xp 5624  df-rel 5625  df-cnv 5626  df-dm 5628  df-rn 5629  df-res 5630  df-ima 5631  df-ec 8635

This theorem is referenced by:  inecmo3  38736  dfeldisj5  39180