Theorem dfeldisj5 36759

Description: Alternate definition of the disjoint elementhood predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Sep-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfeldisj5	⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) = ∅))

Distinct variable group:   𝑢,𝐴,𝑣

Proof of Theorem dfeldisj5

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfeldisj4 36758	. 2 ⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝑢)
2		inecmo2 36415	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]◡ E ∩ [𝑣]◡ E ) = ∅) ∧ Rel ◡ E ) ↔ (∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢◡ E 𝑥 ∧ Rel ◡ E ))
3		relcnv 6001	. . . . 5 ⊢ Rel ◡ E
4	3	biantru 529	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]◡ E ∩ [𝑣]◡ E ) = ∅) ↔ (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]◡ E ∩ [𝑣]◡ E ) = ∅) ∧ Rel ◡ E ))
5	3	biantru 529	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢◡ E 𝑥 ↔ (∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢◡ E 𝑥 ∧ Rel ◡ E ))
6	2, 4, 5	3bitr4i 302	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]◡ E ∩ [𝑣]◡ E ) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢◡ E 𝑥)
7		eccnvep 36344	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑢 ∈ V → [𝑢]◡ E = 𝑢)
8	7	elv 3428	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ [𝑢]◡ E = 𝑢
9		eccnvep 36344	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑣 ∈ V → [𝑣]◡ E = 𝑣)
10	9	elv 3428	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ [𝑣]◡ E = 𝑣
11	8, 10	ineq12i 4141	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ([𝑢]◡ E ∩ [𝑣]◡ E ) = (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣)
12	11	eqeq1i 2743	. . . . 5 ⊢ (([𝑢]◡ E ∩ [𝑣]◡ E ) = ∅ ↔ (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) = ∅)
13	12	orbi2i 909	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]◡ E ∩ [𝑣]◡ E ) = ∅) ↔ (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) = ∅))
14	13	2ralbii 3091	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]◡ E ∩ [𝑣]◡ E ) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) = ∅))
15		brcnvep 36331	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑢 ∈ V → (𝑢◡ E 𝑥 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑢))
16	15	elv 3428	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑢◡ E 𝑥 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑢)
17	16	rmobii 3322	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢◡ E 𝑥 ↔ ∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝑢)
18	17	albii 1823	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢◡ E 𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝑢)
19	6, 14, 18	3bitr3i 300	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝑢)
20	1, 19	bitr4i 277	1 ⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) = ∅))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395   ∨ wo 843  ∀wal 1537   = wceq 1539  ∀wral 3063  ∃*wrmo 3066  Vcvv 3422   ∩ cin 3882  ∅c0 4253   class class class wbr 5070   E cep 5485  ^◡ccnv 5579  Rel wrel 5585  [cec 8454   ElDisj weldisj 36296

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5218  ax-nul 5225  ax-pr 5347

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1784  df-nf 1788  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-nfc 2888  df-ne 2943  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3069  df-rmo 3071  df-rab 3072  df-v 3424  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-nul 4254  df-if 4457  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561  df-op 4565  df-br 5071  df-opab 5133  df-id 5480  df-eprel 5486  df-xp 5586  df-rel 5587  df-cnv 5588  df-co 5589  df-dm 5590  df-rn 5591  df-res 5592  df-ima 5593  df-ec 8458  df-coss 36464  df-cnvrefrel 36570  df-disjALTV 36743  df-eldisj 36745

This theorem is referenced by: (None)