Theorem dfeldisj5 36832

Description: Alternate definition of the disjoint elementhood predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Sep-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfeldisj5	⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) = ∅))

Distinct variable group:   𝑢,𝐴,𝑣

Proof of Theorem dfeldisj5

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfeldisj4 36831	. 2 ⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝑢)
2		inecmo2 36488	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]◡ E ∩ [𝑣]◡ E ) = ∅) ∧ Rel ◡ E ) ↔ (∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢◡ E 𝑥 ∧ Rel ◡ E ))
3		relcnv 6012	. . . . 5 ⊢ Rel ◡ E
4	3	biantru 530	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]◡ E ∩ [𝑣]◡ E ) = ∅) ↔ (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]◡ E ∩ [𝑣]◡ E ) = ∅) ∧ Rel ◡ E ))
5	3	biantru 530	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢◡ E 𝑥 ↔ (∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢◡ E 𝑥 ∧ Rel ◡ E ))
6	2, 4, 5	3bitr4i 303	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]◡ E ∩ [𝑣]◡ E ) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢◡ E 𝑥)
7		eccnvep 36417	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑢 ∈ V → [𝑢]◡ E = 𝑢)
8	7	elv 3438	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ [𝑢]◡ E = 𝑢
9		eccnvep 36417	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑣 ∈ V → [𝑣]◡ E = 𝑣)
10	9	elv 3438	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ [𝑣]◡ E = 𝑣
11	8, 10	ineq12i 4144	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ([𝑢]◡ E ∩ [𝑣]◡ E ) = (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣)
12	11	eqeq1i 2743	. . . . 5 ⊢ (([𝑢]◡ E ∩ [𝑣]◡ E ) = ∅ ↔ (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) = ∅)
13	12	orbi2i 910	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]◡ E ∩ [𝑣]◡ E ) = ∅) ↔ (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) = ∅))
14	13	2ralbii 3093	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]◡ E ∩ [𝑣]◡ E ) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) = ∅))
15		brcnvep 36404	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑢 ∈ V → (𝑢◡ E 𝑥 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑢))
16	15	elv 3438	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑢◡ E 𝑥 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑢)
17	16	rmobii 3331	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢◡ E 𝑥 ↔ ∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝑢)
18	17	albii 1822	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢◡ E 𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝑢)
19	6, 14, 18	3bitr3i 301	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝑢)
20	1, 19	bitr4i 277	1 ⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) = ∅))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 396   ∨ wo 844  ∀wal 1537   = wceq 1539  ∀wral 3064  ∃*wrmo 3067  Vcvv 3432   ∩ cin 3886  ∅c0 4256   class class class wbr 5074   E cep 5494  ^◡ccnv 5588  Rel wrel 5594  [cec 8496   ElDisj weldisj 36369

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5223  ax-nul 5230  ax-pr 5352

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2816  df-nfc 2889  df-ne 2944  df-ral 3069  df-rex 3070  df-rmo 3071  df-rab 3073  df-v 3434  df-dif 3890  df-un 3892  df-in 3894  df-ss 3904  df-nul 4257  df-if 4460  df-sn 4562  df-pr 4564  df-op 4568  df-br 5075  df-opab 5137  df-id 5489  df-eprel 5495  df-xp 5595  df-rel 5596  df-cnv 5597  df-co 5598  df-dm 5599  df-rn 5600  df-res 5601  df-ima 5602  df-ec 8500  df-coss 36537  df-cnvrefrel 36643  df-disjALTV 36816  df-eldisj 36818

This theorem is referenced by: (None)