Theorem ineccnvmo 39034

Description: Equivalence of a double restricted universal quantification and a restricted "at most one" inside a universal quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 2-Sep-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ineccnvmo	⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 = 𝑧 ∨ ([𝑦]◡𝐹 ∩ [𝑧]◡𝐹) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥𝐹𝑦)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝐹,𝑦,𝑧

Proof of Theorem ineccnvmo

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		relcnv 6105	. . 3 ⊢ Rel ◡𝐹
2		id 23	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → 𝑦 = 𝑧)
3	2	inecmo 39032	. . 3 ⊢ (Rel ◡𝐹 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 = 𝑧 ∨ ([𝑦]◡𝐹 ∩ [𝑧]◡𝐹) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦◡𝐹𝑥))
4	1, 3	ax-mp 5	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 = 𝑧 ∨ ([𝑦]◡𝐹 ∩ [𝑧]◡𝐹) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦◡𝐹𝑥)
5		brcnvg 5864	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ V ∧ 𝑥 ∈ V) → (𝑦◡𝐹𝑥 ↔ 𝑥𝐹𝑦))
6	5	el2v 3461	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦◡𝐹𝑥 ↔ 𝑥𝐹𝑦)
7	6	rmobii 3376	. . 3 ⊢ (∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦◡𝐹𝑥 ↔ ∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥𝐹𝑦)
8	7	albii 1848	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦◡𝐹𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥𝐹𝑦)
9	4, 8	bitri 278	1 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 = 𝑧 ∨ ([𝑦]◡𝐹 ∩ [𝑧]◡𝐹) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥𝐹𝑦)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209   ∨ wo 860  ∀wal 1567   = wceq 1569  ∀wral 3078  ∃*wrmo 3367  Vcvv 3454   ∩ cin 3903  ∅c0 4285   class class class wbr 5108  ^◡ccnv 5659  Rel wrel 5665  [cec 8690

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1824  ax-4 1838  ax-5 1939  ax-6 1996  ax-7 2037  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-11 2191  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5256  ax-pr 5403

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1104  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1809  df-sb 2096  df-mo 2566  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rmo 3368  df-rab 3416  df-v 3456  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-nul 4286  df-if 4487  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4595  df-br 5109  df-opab 5173  df-xp 5666  df-rel 5667  df-cnv 5668  df-dm 5670  df-rn 5671  df-res 5672  df-ima 5673  df-ec 8694

This theorem is used by:  ineccnvmo2  39045