Theorem ineccnvmo 34437

Description: Equivalence of a double restricted universal quantification and a restricted "at most one" inside a universal quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 2-Sep-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ineccnvmo	⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 = 𝑧 ∨ ([𝑦]◡𝐹 ∩ [𝑧]◡𝐹) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥𝐹𝑦)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝐹,𝑦,𝑧

Proof of Theorem ineccnvmo

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		relcnv 5720	. . 3 ⊢ Rel ◡𝐹
2		id 22	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → 𝑦 = 𝑧)
3	2	inecmo 34435	. . 3 ⊢ (Rel ◡𝐹 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 = 𝑧 ∨ ([𝑦]◡𝐹 ∩ [𝑧]◡𝐹) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦◡𝐹𝑥))
4	1, 3	ax-mp 5	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 = 𝑧 ∨ ([𝑦]◡𝐹 ∩ [𝑧]◡𝐹) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦◡𝐹𝑥)
5		brcnvg 5511	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ V ∧ 𝑥 ∈ V) → (𝑦◡𝐹𝑥 ↔ 𝑥𝐹𝑦))
6	5	el2v 34308	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦◡𝐹𝑥 ↔ 𝑥𝐹𝑦)
7	6	rmobii 3329	. . 3 ⊢ (∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦◡𝐹𝑥 ↔ ∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥𝐹𝑦)
8	7	albii 1904	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦◡𝐹𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥𝐹𝑦)
9	4, 8	bitri 266	1 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 = 𝑧 ∨ ([𝑦]◡𝐹 ∩ [𝑧]◡𝐹) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥𝐹𝑦)

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 197   ∨ wo 865  ∀wal 1635   = wceq 1637  ∀wral 3103  ∃*wrmo 3106  Vcvv 3398   ∩ cin 3775  ∅c0 4123   class class class wbr 4851  ^◡ccnv 5317  Rel wrel 5323  [cec 7980

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1877  ax-4 1894  ax-5 2001  ax-6 2069  ax-7 2105  ax-9 2166  ax-10 2186  ax-11 2202  ax-12 2215  ax-13 2422  ax-ext 2791  ax-sep 4982  ax-nul 4990  ax-pr 5103

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 198  df-an 385  df-or 866  df-3an 1102  df-tru 1641  df-ex 1860  df-nf 1864  df-sb 2062  df-mo 2635  df-eu 2638  df-clab 2800  df-cleq 2806  df-clel 2809  df-nfc 2944  df-ral 3108  df-rex 3109  df-rmo 3111  df-rab 3112  df-v 3400  df-sbc 3641  df-dif 3779  df-un 3781  df-in 3783  df-ss 3790  df-nul 4124  df-if 4287  df-sn 4378  df-pr 4380  df-op 4384  df-br 4852  df-opab 4914  df-xp 5324  df-rel 5325  df-cnv 5326  df-dm 5328  df-rn 5329  df-res 5330  df-ima 5331  df-ec 7984

This theorem is referenced by:  ineccnvmo2  34440