Theorem ineccnvmo 36085

Description: Equivalence of a double restricted universal quantification and a restricted "at most one" inside a universal quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 2-Sep-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ineccnvmo	⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 = 𝑧 ∨ ([𝑦]◡𝐹 ∩ [𝑧]◡𝐹) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥𝐹𝑦)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝐹,𝑦,𝑧

Proof of Theorem ineccnvmo

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		relcnv 5944	. . 3 ⊢ Rel ◡𝐹
2		id 22	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → 𝑦 = 𝑧)
3	2	inecmo 36083	. . 3 ⊢ (Rel ◡𝐹 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 = 𝑧 ∨ ([𝑦]◡𝐹 ∩ [𝑧]◡𝐹) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦◡𝐹𝑥))
4	1, 3	ax-mp 5	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 = 𝑧 ∨ ([𝑦]◡𝐹 ∩ [𝑧]◡𝐹) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦◡𝐹𝑥)
5		brcnvg 5725	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ V ∧ 𝑥 ∈ V) → (𝑦◡𝐹𝑥 ↔ 𝑥𝐹𝑦))
6	5	el2v 3417	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦◡𝐹𝑥 ↔ 𝑥𝐹𝑦)
7	6	rmobii 3314	. . 3 ⊢ (∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦◡𝐹𝑥 ↔ ∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥𝐹𝑦)
8	7	albii 1821	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦◡𝐹𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥𝐹𝑦)
9	4, 8	bitri 278	1 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 = 𝑧 ∨ ([𝑦]◡𝐹 ∩ [𝑧]◡𝐹) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥𝐹𝑦)

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 209   ∨ wo 844  ∀wal 1536   = wceq 1538  ∀wral 3070  ∃*wrmo 3073  Vcvv 3409   ∩ cin 3859  ∅c0 4227   class class class wbr 5036  ^◡ccnv 5527  Rel wrel 5533  [cec 8303

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2729  ax-sep 5173  ax-nul 5180  ax-pr 5302

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 845  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1541  df-fal 1551  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2557  df-clab 2736  df-cleq 2750  df-clel 2830  df-nfc 2901  df-ral 3075  df-rex 3076  df-rmo 3078  df-rab 3079  df-v 3411  df-sbc 3699  df-dif 3863  df-un 3865  df-in 3867  df-ss 3877  df-nul 4228  df-if 4424  df-sn 4526  df-pr 4528  df-op 4532  df-br 5037  df-opab 5099  df-xp 5534  df-rel 5535  df-cnv 5536  df-dm 5538  df-rn 5539  df-res 5540  df-ima 5541  df-ec 8307

This theorem is referenced by:  ineccnvmo2  36088