Theorem ineccnvmo 36468

Description: Equivalence of a double restricted universal quantification and a restricted "at most one" inside a universal quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 2-Sep-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ineccnvmo	⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 = 𝑧 ∨ ([𝑦]◡𝐹 ∩ [𝑧]◡𝐹) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥𝐹𝑦)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝐹,𝑦,𝑧

Proof of Theorem ineccnvmo

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		relcnv 6009	. . 3 ⊢ Rel ◡𝐹
2		id 22	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → 𝑦 = 𝑧)
3	2	inecmo 36466	. . 3 ⊢ (Rel ◡𝐹 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 = 𝑧 ∨ ([𝑦]◡𝐹 ∩ [𝑧]◡𝐹) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦◡𝐹𝑥))
4	1, 3	ax-mp 5	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 = 𝑧 ∨ ([𝑦]◡𝐹 ∩ [𝑧]◡𝐹) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦◡𝐹𝑥)
5		brcnvg 5785	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ V ∧ 𝑥 ∈ V) → (𝑦◡𝐹𝑥 ↔ 𝑥𝐹𝑦))
6	5	el2v 3438	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦◡𝐹𝑥 ↔ 𝑥𝐹𝑦)
7	6	rmobii 3329	. . 3 ⊢ (∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦◡𝐹𝑥 ↔ ∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥𝐹𝑦)
8	7	albii 1825	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦◡𝐹𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥𝐹𝑦)
9	4, 8	bitri 274	1 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 = 𝑧 ∨ ([𝑦]◡𝐹 ∩ [𝑧]◡𝐹) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥𝐹𝑦)

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 205   ∨ wo 843  ∀wal 1539   = wceq 1541  ∀wral 3065  ∃*wrmo 3068  Vcvv 3430   ∩ cin 3890  ∅c0 4261   class class class wbr 5078  ^◡ccnv 5587  Rel wrel 5593  [cec 8470

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1801  ax-4 1815  ax-5 1916  ax-6 1974  ax-7 2014  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2140  ax-11 2157  ax-12 2174  ax-ext 2710  ax-sep 5226  ax-nul 5233  ax-pr 5355

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1786  df-nf 1790  df-sb 2071  df-mo 2541  df-clab 2717  df-cleq 2731  df-clel 2817  df-ral 3070  df-rex 3071  df-rmo 3073  df-rab 3074  df-v 3432  df-dif 3894  df-un 3896  df-in 3898  df-ss 3908  df-nul 4262  df-if 4465  df-sn 4567  df-pr 4569  df-op 4573  df-br 5079  df-opab 5141  df-xp 5594  df-rel 5595  df-cnv 5596  df-dm 5598  df-rn 5599  df-res 5600  df-ima 5601  df-ec 8474

This theorem is referenced by:  ineccnvmo2  36471