Theorem lmhmclm 25246

Description: The domain of a linear operator is a subcomplex module iff the range is. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Oct-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lmhmclm	⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇) → (𝑆 ∈ ℂMod ↔ 𝑇 ∈ ℂMod))

Proof of Theorem lmhmclm

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		lmhmlmod1 21154	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇) → 𝑆 ∈ LMod)
2		lmhmlmod2 21153	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇) → 𝑇 ∈ LMod)
3	1, 2	2thd 268	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇) → (𝑆 ∈ LMod ↔ 𝑇 ∈ LMod))
4		eqid 2763	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Scalar‘𝑆) = (Scalar‘𝑆)
5		eqid 2763	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Scalar‘𝑇) = (Scalar‘𝑇)
6	4, 5	lmhmsca 21151	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇) → (Scalar‘𝑇) = (Scalar‘𝑆))
7	6	eqcomd 2769	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇) → (Scalar‘𝑆) = (Scalar‘𝑇))
8	7	fveq2d 6885	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇) → (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑆)) = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑇)))
9	8	oveq2d 7426	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇) → (ℂfld ↾s (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑆))) = (ℂfld ↾s (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑇))))
10	7, 9	eqeq12d 2779	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇) → ((Scalar‘𝑆) = (ℂfld ↾s (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑆))) ↔ (Scalar‘𝑇) = (ℂfld ↾s (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑇)))))
11	8	eleq1d 2848	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇) → ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝑆)) ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld) ↔ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑇)) ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld)))
12	3, 10, 11	3anbi123d 1464	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇) → ((𝑆 ∈ LMod ∧ (Scalar‘𝑆) = (ℂfld ↾s (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑆))) ∧ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑆)) ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld)) ↔ (𝑇 ∈ LMod ∧ (Scalar‘𝑇) = (ℂfld ↾s (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑇))) ∧ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑇)) ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld))))
13		eqid 2763	. . 3 ⊢ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑆)) = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑆))
14	4, 13	isclm 25223	. 2 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ ℂMod ↔ (𝑆 ∈ LMod ∧ (Scalar‘𝑆) = (ℂfld ↾s (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑆))) ∧ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑆)) ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld)))
15		eqid 2763	. . 3 ⊢ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑇)) = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑇))
16	5, 15	isclm 25223	. 2 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ ℂMod ↔ (𝑇 ∈ LMod ∧ (Scalar‘𝑇) = (ℂfld ↾s (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑇))) ∧ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑇)) ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld)))
17	12, 14, 16	3bitr4g 317	1 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇) → (𝑆 ∈ ℂMod ↔ 𝑇 ∈ ℂMod))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2143  ‘cfv 6536  (class class class)co 7410  Basecbs 17264   ↾_s cress 17285  Scalarcsca 17308  SubRingcsubrg 20668  LModclmod 20981   LMHom clmhm 21140  ℂ_fldccnfld 21522  ℂModcclm 25221

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5257  ax-nul 5269  ax-pr 5404

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-sbc 3745  df-dif 3908  df-un 3910  df-in 3912  df-ss 3922  df-nul 4287  df-if 4488  df-pw 4564  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4873  df-br 5110  df-opab 5174  df-id 5556  df-xp 5667  df-rel 5668  df-cnv 5669  df-co 5670  df-dm 5671  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fv 6544  df-ov 7413  df-oprab 7414  df-mpo 7415  df-lmhm 21143  df-clm 25222

This theorem is referenced by: (None)