Theorem lmhmclm 24827

Description: The domain of a linear operator is a subcomplex module iff the range is. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Oct-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lmhmclm	⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇) → (𝑆 ∈ ℂMod ↔ 𝑇 ∈ ℂMod))

Proof of Theorem lmhmclm

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		lmhmlmod1 20788	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇) → 𝑆 ∈ LMod)
2		lmhmlmod2 20787	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇) → 𝑇 ∈ LMod)
3	1, 2	2thd 264	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇) → (𝑆 ∈ LMod ↔ 𝑇 ∈ LMod))
4		eqid 2732	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Scalar‘𝑆) = (Scalar‘𝑆)
5		eqid 2732	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Scalar‘𝑇) = (Scalar‘𝑇)
6	4, 5	lmhmsca 20785	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇) → (Scalar‘𝑇) = (Scalar‘𝑆))
7	6	eqcomd 2738	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇) → (Scalar‘𝑆) = (Scalar‘𝑇))
8	7	fveq2d 6895	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇) → (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑆)) = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑇)))
9	8	oveq2d 7427	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇) → (ℂfld ↾s (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑆))) = (ℂfld ↾s (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑇))))
10	7, 9	eqeq12d 2748	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇) → ((Scalar‘𝑆) = (ℂfld ↾s (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑆))) ↔ (Scalar‘𝑇) = (ℂfld ↾s (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑇)))))
11	8	eleq1d 2818	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇) → ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝑆)) ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld) ↔ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑇)) ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld)))
12	3, 10, 11	3anbi123d 1436	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇) → ((𝑆 ∈ LMod ∧ (Scalar‘𝑆) = (ℂfld ↾s (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑆))) ∧ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑆)) ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld)) ↔ (𝑇 ∈ LMod ∧ (Scalar‘𝑇) = (ℂfld ↾s (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑇))) ∧ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑇)) ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld))))
13		eqid 2732	. . 3 ⊢ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑆)) = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑆))
14	4, 13	isclm 24804	. 2 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ ℂMod ↔ (𝑆 ∈ LMod ∧ (Scalar‘𝑆) = (ℂfld ↾s (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑆))) ∧ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑆)) ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld)))
15		eqid 2732	. . 3 ⊢ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑇)) = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑇))
16	5, 15	isclm 24804	. 2 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ ℂMod ↔ (𝑇 ∈ LMod ∧ (Scalar‘𝑇) = (ℂfld ↾s (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑇))) ∧ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑇)) ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld)))
17	12, 14, 16	3bitr4g 313	1 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇) → (𝑆 ∈ ℂMod ↔ 𝑇 ∈ ℂMod))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ w3a 1087   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2106  ‘cfv 6543  (class class class)co 7411  Basecbs 17148   ↾_s cress 17177  Scalarcsca 17204  SubRingcsubrg 20457  LModclmod 20614   LMHom clmhm 20774  ℂ_fldccnfld 21144  ℂModcclm 24802

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-ext 2703  ax-sep 5299  ax-nul 5306  ax-pr 5427

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 846  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2534  df-eu 2563  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2724  df-clel 2810  df-nfc 2885  df-ne 2941  df-ral 3062  df-rex 3071  df-rab 3433  df-v 3476  df-sbc 3778  df-dif 3951  df-un 3953  df-in 3955  df-ss 3965  df-nul 4323  df-if 4529  df-sn 4629  df-pr 4631  df-op 4635  df-uni 4909  df-br 5149  df-opab 5211  df-id 5574  df-xp 5682  df-rel 5683  df-cnv 5684  df-co 5685  df-dm 5686  df-iota 6495  df-fun 6545  df-fv 6551  df-ov 7414  df-oprab 7415  df-mpo 7416  df-lmhm 20777  df-clm 24803

This theorem is referenced by: (None)