Theorem lmhmclm 25009

Description: The domain of a linear operator is a subcomplex module iff the range is. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Oct-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lmhmclm	⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇) → (𝑆 ∈ ℂMod ↔ 𝑇 ∈ ℂMod))

Proof of Theorem lmhmclm

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		lmhmlmod1 20962	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇) → 𝑆 ∈ LMod)
2		lmhmlmod2 20961	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇) → 𝑇 ∈ LMod)
3	1, 2	2thd 265	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇) → (𝑆 ∈ LMod ↔ 𝑇 ∈ LMod))
4		eqid 2731	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Scalar‘𝑆) = (Scalar‘𝑆)
5		eqid 2731	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Scalar‘𝑇) = (Scalar‘𝑇)
6	4, 5	lmhmsca 20959	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇) → (Scalar‘𝑇) = (Scalar‘𝑆))
7	6	eqcomd 2737	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇) → (Scalar‘𝑆) = (Scalar‘𝑇))
8	7	fveq2d 6821	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇) → (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑆)) = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑇)))
9	8	oveq2d 7357	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇) → (ℂfld ↾s (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑆))) = (ℂfld ↾s (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑇))))
10	7, 9	eqeq12d 2747	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇) → ((Scalar‘𝑆) = (ℂfld ↾s (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑆))) ↔ (Scalar‘𝑇) = (ℂfld ↾s (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑇)))))
11	8	eleq1d 2816	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇) → ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝑆)) ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld) ↔ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑇)) ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld)))
12	3, 10, 11	3anbi123d 1438	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇) → ((𝑆 ∈ LMod ∧ (Scalar‘𝑆) = (ℂfld ↾s (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑆))) ∧ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑆)) ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld)) ↔ (𝑇 ∈ LMod ∧ (Scalar‘𝑇) = (ℂfld ↾s (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑇))) ∧ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑇)) ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld))))
13		eqid 2731	. . 3 ⊢ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑆)) = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑆))
14	4, 13	isclm 24986	. 2 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ ℂMod ↔ (𝑆 ∈ LMod ∧ (Scalar‘𝑆) = (ℂfld ↾s (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑆))) ∧ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑆)) ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld)))
15		eqid 2731	. . 3 ⊢ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑇)) = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑇))
16	5, 15	isclm 24986	. 2 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ ℂMod ↔ (𝑇 ∈ LMod ∧ (Scalar‘𝑇) = (ℂfld ↾s (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑇))) ∧ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑇)) ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld)))
17	12, 14, 16	3bitr4g 314	1 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇) → (𝑆 ∈ ℂMod ↔ 𝑇 ∈ ℂMod))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ w3a 1086   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2111  ‘cfv 6476  (class class class)co 7341  Basecbs 17115   ↾_s cress 17136  Scalarcsca 17159  SubRingcsubrg 20479  LModclmod 20788   LMHom clmhm 20948  ℂ_fldccnfld 21286  ℂModcclm 24984

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-10 2144  ax-11 2160  ax-12 2180  ax-ext 2703  ax-sep 5229  ax-nul 5239  ax-pr 5365

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2535  df-eu 2564  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2723  df-clel 2806  df-nfc 2881  df-ne 2929  df-ral 3048  df-rex 3057  df-rab 3396  df-v 3438  df-sbc 3737  df-dif 3900  df-un 3902  df-in 3904  df-ss 3914  df-nul 4279  df-if 4471  df-pw 4547  df-sn 4572  df-pr 4574  df-op 4578  df-uni 4855  df-br 5087  df-opab 5149  df-id 5506  df-xp 5617  df-rel 5618  df-cnv 5619  df-co 5620  df-dm 5621  df-iota 6432  df-fun 6478  df-fv 6484  df-ov 7344  df-oprab 7345  df-mpo 7346  df-lmhm 20951  df-clm 24985

This theorem is referenced by: (None)