Theorem ndmovordi 7603

Description: Elimination of redundant antecedent in an ordering law. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-1998.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ndmovordi.2	⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝑆 × 𝑆)
ndmovordi.4	⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆)
ndmovordi.5	⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝑆
ndmovordi.6	⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐶𝐹𝐴)𝑅(𝐶𝐹𝐵)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ndmovordi	⊢ ((𝐶𝐹𝐴)𝑅(𝐶𝐹𝐵) → 𝐴𝑅𝐵)

Proof of Theorem ndmovordi

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ndmovordi.4	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆)
2	1	brel 5725	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐶𝐹𝐴)𝑅(𝐶𝐹𝐵) → ((𝐶𝐹𝐴) ∈ 𝑆 ∧ (𝐶𝐹𝐵) ∈ 𝑆))
3	2	simpld 499	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐶𝐹𝐴)𝑅(𝐶𝐹𝐵) → (𝐶𝐹𝐴) ∈ 𝑆)
4		ndmovordi.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝑆 × 𝑆)
5		ndmovordi.5	. . . . 5 ⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝑆
6	4, 5	ndmovrcl 7598	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐶𝐹𝐴) ∈ 𝑆 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆))
7	6	simpld 499	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐶𝐹𝐴) ∈ 𝑆 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)
8	3, 7	syl 18	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐶𝐹𝐴)𝑅(𝐶𝐹𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)
9		ndmovordi.6	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐶𝐹𝐴)𝑅(𝐶𝐹𝐵)))
10	9	biimprd 251	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 → ((𝐶𝐹𝐴)𝑅(𝐶𝐹𝐵) → 𝐴𝑅𝐵))
11	8, 10	mpcom 39	1 ⊢ ((𝐶𝐹𝐴)𝑅(𝐶𝐹𝐵) → 𝐴𝑅𝐵)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2142   ⊆ wss 3904  ∅c0 4285   class class class wbr 5108   × cxp 5658  dom cdm 5660  (class class class)co 7412

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1824  ax-4 1838  ax-5 1939  ax-6 1996  ax-7 2037  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5256  ax-nul 5268  ax-pr 5403

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1104  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1809  df-sb 2096  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3416  df-v 3456  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-nul 4286  df-if 4487  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4595  df-uni 4872  df-br 5109  df-opab 5173  df-xp 5666  df-dm 5670  df-iota 6492  df-fv 6544  df-ov 7415

This theorem is used by:  ltexprlem4  11030  ltsosr  11085