P. 77 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 7601-7700   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	ovconst2 7601	The value of a constant operation. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2006.)
⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑅((𝐴 × 𝐵) × {𝐶})𝑆) = 𝐶)
Theorem	oprssdm 7602*	Domain of closure of an operation. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-1995.)
⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝑆    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⊆ dom 𝐹
Theorem	nssdmovg 7603	The value of an operation outside its domain. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 7-Sep-2017.)
⊢ ((dom 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑅 × 𝑆) ∧ ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = ∅)
Theorem	ndmovg 7604	The value of an operation outside its domain. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((dom 𝐹 = (𝑅 × 𝑆) ∧ ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = ∅)
Theorem	ndmov 7605	The value of an operation outside its domain. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-1995.)
⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝑆 × 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = ∅)
Theorem	ndmovcl 7606	The closure of an operation outside its domain, when the domain includes the empty set. This technical lemma can make the operation more convenient to work in some cases. It is dependent on our particular definitions of operation value, function value, and ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 24-Sep-2004.)
⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝑆 × 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ∅ ∈ 𝑆    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) ∈ 𝑆
Theorem	ndmovrcl 7607	Reverse closure law, when an operation's domain doesn't contain the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-1996.)
⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝑆 × 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝑆    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) ∈ 𝑆 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆))
Theorem	ndmovcom 7608	Any operation is commutative outside its domain. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-1995.)
⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝑆 × 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐵𝐹𝐴))
Theorem	ndmovass 7609	Any operation is associative outside its domain, if the domain doesn't contain the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-1995.)
⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝑆 × 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝑆    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹𝐶) = (𝐴𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐶)))
Theorem	ndmovdistr 7610	Any operation is distributive outside its domain, if the domain doesn't contain the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-1995.)
⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝑆 × 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝑆    &   ⊢ dom 𝐺 = (𝑆 × 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐴𝐺(𝐵𝐹𝐶)) = ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐹(𝐴𝐺𝐶)))
Theorem	ndmovord 7611	Elimination of redundant antecedents in an ordering law. (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-1996.)
⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝑆 × 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝑆    &   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐶𝐹𝐴)𝑅(𝐶𝐹𝐵)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐶𝐹𝐴)𝑅(𝐶𝐹𝐵)))
Theorem	ndmovordi 7612	Elimination of redundant antecedent in an ordering law. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-1998.)
⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝑆 × 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝑆    &   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐶𝐹𝐴)𝑅(𝐶𝐹𝐵)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶𝐹𝐴)𝑅(𝐶𝐹𝐵) → 𝐴𝑅𝐵)
2.3.19.1  Variable-to-class conversion for operations
Theorem	caovclg 7613*	Convert an operation closure law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∈ 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) ∈ 𝐸)
Theorem	caovcld 7614*	Convert an operation closure law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∈ 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) ∈ 𝐸)
Theorem	caovcl 7615*	Convert an operation closure law to class notation. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	caovcomg 7616*	Convert an operation commutative law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐵𝐹𝐴))
Theorem	caovcomd 7617*	Convert an operation commutative law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐵𝐹𝐴))
Theorem	caovcom 7618*	Convert an operation commutative law to class notation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐵𝐹𝐴)
Theorem	caovassg 7619*	Convert an operation associative law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Jun-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹𝐶) = (𝐴𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐶)))
Theorem	caovassd 7620*	Convert an operation associative law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹𝐶) = (𝐴𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐶)))
Theorem	caovass 7621*	Convert an operation associative law to class notation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹𝐶) = (𝐴𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐶))
Theorem	caovcang 7622*	Convert an operation cancellation law to class notation. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑥𝐹𝑧) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐴𝐹𝐶) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶))
Theorem	caovcand 7623*	Convert an operation cancellation law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑥𝐹𝑧) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑧))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐴𝐹𝐶) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶))
Theorem	caovcanrd 7624*	Commute the arguments of an operation cancellation law. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑥𝐹𝑧) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑧))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐵𝐹𝐴) = (𝐶𝐹𝐴) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶))
Theorem	caovcan 7625*	Convert an operation cancellation law to class notation. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-1995.)
⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑥𝐹𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐴𝐹𝐶) → 𝐵 = 𝐶))
Theorem	caovordig 7626*	Convert an operation ordering law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Dec-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → (𝑧𝐹𝑥)𝑅(𝑧𝐹𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 → (𝐶𝐹𝐴)𝑅(𝐶𝐹𝐵)))
Theorem	caovordid 7627*	Convert an operation ordering law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Dec-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → (𝑧𝐹𝑥)𝑅(𝑧𝐹𝑦)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 → (𝐶𝐹𝐴)𝑅(𝐶𝐹𝐵)))
Theorem	caovordg 7628*	Convert an operation ordering law to class notation. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ (𝑧𝐹𝑥)𝑅(𝑧𝐹𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐶𝐹𝐴)𝑅(𝐶𝐹𝐵)))
Theorem	caovordd 7629*	Convert an operation ordering law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ (𝑧𝐹𝑥)𝑅(𝑧𝐹𝑦)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐶𝐹𝐴)𝑅(𝐶𝐹𝐵)))
Theorem	caovord2d 7630*	Operation ordering law with commuted arguments. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ (𝑧𝐹𝑥)𝑅(𝑧𝐹𝑦)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝐹𝐶)𝑅(𝐵𝐹𝐶)))
Theorem	caovord3d 7631*	Ordering law. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ (𝑧𝐹𝑥)𝑅(𝑧𝐹𝑦)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐶𝐹𝐷) → (𝐴𝑅𝐶 ↔ 𝐷𝑅𝐵)))
Theorem	caovord 7632*	Convert an operation ordering law to class notation. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-1996.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ (𝑧𝐹𝑥)𝑅(𝑧𝐹𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐶𝐹𝐴)𝑅(𝐶𝐹𝐵)))
Theorem	caovord2 7633*	Operation ordering law with commuted arguments. (Contributed by NM, 27-Feb-1996.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ (𝑧𝐹𝑥)𝑅(𝑧𝐹𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝐹𝐶)𝑅(𝐵𝐹𝐶)))
Theorem	caovord3 7634*	Ordering law. (Contributed by NM, 29-Feb-1996.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ (𝑧𝐹𝑥)𝑅(𝑧𝐹𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐶𝐹𝐷)) → (𝐴𝑅𝐶 ↔ 𝐷𝑅𝐵))
Theorem	caovdig 7635*	Convert an operation distributive law to class notation. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐺(𝑦𝐹𝑧)) = ((𝑥𝐺𝑦)𝐻(𝑥𝐺𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝐴𝐺(𝐵𝐹𝐶)) = ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐻(𝐴𝐺𝐶)))
Theorem	caovdid 7636*	Convert an operation distributive law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐺(𝑦𝐹𝑧)) = ((𝑥𝐺𝑦)𝐻(𝑥𝐺𝑧)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐺(𝐵𝐹𝐶)) = ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐻(𝐴𝐺𝐶)))
Theorem	caovdir2d 7637*	Convert an operation distributive law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐺(𝑦𝐹𝑧)) = ((𝑥𝐺𝑦)𝐹(𝑥𝐺𝑧)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐺𝑦) = (𝑦𝐺𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐺𝐶) = ((𝐴𝐺𝐶)𝐹(𝐵𝐺𝐶)))
Theorem	caovdirg 7638*	Convert an operation reverse distributive law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐾)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐺𝑧) = ((𝑥𝐺𝑧)𝐻(𝑦𝐺𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐾)) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐺𝐶) = ((𝐴𝐺𝐶)𝐻(𝐵𝐺𝐶)))
Theorem	caovdird 7639*	Convert an operation distributive law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐾)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐺𝑧) = ((𝑥𝐺𝑧)𝐻(𝑦𝐺𝑧)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐺𝐶) = ((𝐴𝐺𝐶)𝐻(𝐵𝐺𝐶)))
Theorem	caovdi 7640*	Convert an operation distributive law to class notation. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥𝐺(𝑦𝐹𝑧)) = ((𝑥𝐺𝑦)𝐹(𝑥𝐺𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴𝐺(𝐵𝐹𝐶)) = ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐹(𝐴𝐺𝐶))
Theorem	caov32d 7641*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹𝐶) = ((𝐴𝐹𝐶)𝐹𝐵))
Theorem	caov12d 7642*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐶)) = (𝐵𝐹(𝐴𝐹𝐶)))
Theorem	caov31d 7643*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹𝐶) = ((𝐶𝐹𝐵)𝐹𝐴))
Theorem	caov13d 7644*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐶)) = (𝐶𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐴)))
Theorem	caov4d 7645*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹(𝐶𝐹𝐷)) = ((𝐴𝐹𝐶)𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐷)))
Theorem	caov411d 7646*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹(𝐶𝐹𝐷)) = ((𝐶𝐹𝐵)𝐹(𝐴𝐹𝐷)))
Theorem	caov42d 7647*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹(𝐶𝐹𝐷)) = ((𝐴𝐹𝐶)𝐹(𝐷𝐹𝐵)))
Theorem	caov32 7648*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹𝐶) = ((𝐴𝐹𝐶)𝐹𝐵)
Theorem	caov12 7649*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐶)) = (𝐵𝐹(𝐴𝐹𝐶))
Theorem	caov31 7650*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹𝐶) = ((𝐶𝐹𝐵)𝐹𝐴)
Theorem	caov13 7651*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐶)) = (𝐶𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐴))
Theorem	caov4 7652*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹(𝐶𝐹𝐷)) = ((𝐴𝐹𝐶)𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐷))
Theorem	caov411 7653*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹(𝐶𝐹𝐷)) = ((𝐶𝐹𝐵)𝐹(𝐴𝐹𝐷))
Theorem	caov42 7654*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹(𝐶𝐹𝐷)) = ((𝐴𝐹𝐶)𝐹(𝐷𝐹𝐵))
Theorem	caovdir 7655*	Reverse distributive law. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥𝐺𝑦) = (𝑦𝐺𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝑥𝐺(𝑦𝐹𝑧)) = ((𝑥𝐺𝑦)𝐹(𝑥𝐺𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐺𝐶) = ((𝐴𝐺𝐶)𝐹(𝐵𝐺𝐶))
Theorem	caovdilem 7656*	Lemma used by real number construction. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥𝐺𝑦) = (𝑦𝐺𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝑥𝐺(𝑦𝐹𝑧)) = ((𝑥𝐺𝑦)𝐹(𝑥𝐺𝑧))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ V    &   ⊢ ((𝑥𝐺𝑦)𝐺𝑧) = (𝑥𝐺(𝑦𝐺𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴𝐺𝐶)𝐹(𝐵𝐺𝐷))𝐺𝐻) = ((𝐴𝐺(𝐶𝐺𝐻))𝐹(𝐵𝐺(𝐷𝐺𝐻)))
Theorem	caovlem2 7657*	Lemma used in real number construction. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥𝐺𝑦) = (𝑦𝐺𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝑥𝐺(𝑦𝐹𝑧)) = ((𝑥𝐺𝑦)𝐹(𝑥𝐺𝑧))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ V    &   ⊢ ((𝑥𝐺𝑦)𝐺𝑧) = (𝑥𝐺(𝑦𝐺𝑧))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐴𝐺𝐶)𝐹(𝐵𝐺𝐷))𝐺𝐻)𝐹(((𝐴𝐺𝐷)𝐹(𝐵𝐺𝐶))𝐺𝑅)) = ((𝐴𝐺((𝐶𝐺𝐻)𝐹(𝐷𝐺𝑅)))𝐹(𝐵𝐺((𝐶𝐺𝑅)𝐹(𝐷𝐺𝐻))))
Theorem	caovmo 7658*	Uniqueness of inverse element in commutative, associative operation with identity. Remark in proof of Proposition 9-2.4 of [Gleason] p. 119. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-1996.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆    &   ⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝑆 × 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝑆    &   ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 → (𝑥𝐹𝐵) = 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ ∃*𝑤(𝐴𝐹𝑤) = 𝐵
Theorem	imaeqexov 7659*	Substitute an operation value into an existential quantifier over an image. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦𝐹𝑧) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 × 𝐶) ⊆ 𝐴) → (∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐹 “ (𝐵 × 𝐶))𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝜓))
Theorem	imaeqalov 7660*	Substitute an operation value into a universal quantifier over an image. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦𝐹𝑧) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 × 𝐶) ⊆ 𝐴) → (∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐹 “ (𝐵 × 𝐶))𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝜓))
2.3.20  Operations in maps-to notation
Theorem	mpondm0 7661*	The value of an operation given by a maps-to rule is the empty set if the arguments are not contained in the base sets of the rule. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 12-Oct-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑉𝐹𝑊) = ∅)
Theorem	elmpocl 7662*	If a two-parameter class is not empty, constrain the implicit pair. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Mar-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (𝑆𝐹𝑇) → (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	elmpocl1 7663*	If a two-parameter class is not empty, the first argument is in its nominal domain. (Contributed by FL, 15-Oct-2012.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Mar-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (𝑆𝐹𝑇) → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	elmpocl2 7664*	If a two-parameter class is not empty, the second argument is in its nominal domain. (Contributed by FL, 15-Oct-2012.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Mar-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (𝑆𝐹𝑇) → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	elovmpod 7665*	Utility lemma for two-parameter classes. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Jan-2015.) Variant of elovmpo 7666 in deduction form. (Revised by AV, 20-Apr-2025.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝑎 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝑌) → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 ∈ (𝑋𝑂𝑌) ↔ 𝐸 ∈ 𝐷))
Theorem	elovmpo 7666*	Utility lemma for two-parameter classes. EDITORIAL: can simplify islmhm 21307. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ ((𝑎 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝑌) → 𝐶 = 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐷𝑌) ↔ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐸))
Theorem	elovmporab 7667*	Implications for the value of an operation, defined by the maps-to notation with a class abstraction as a result, having an element. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Jul-2018.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ∣ 𝜑})    &   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ V ∧ 𝑌 ∈ V) → 𝑀 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝑂𝑌) → (𝑋 ∈ V ∧ 𝑌 ∈ V ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑀))
Theorem	elovmporab1w 7668*	Implications for the value of an operation, defined by the maps-to notation with a class abstraction as a result, having an element. Here, the base set of the class abstraction depends on the first operand. Version of elovmporab1 7669 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2401. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Jul-2018.) Avoid ax-13 2401. (Revised by GG, 26-Jan-2024.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑧 ∈ ⦋𝑥 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ 𝜑})    &   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ V ∧ 𝑌 ∈ V) → ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝑂𝑌) → (𝑋 ∈ V ∧ 𝑌 ∈ V ∧ 𝑍 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀))
Theorem	elovmporab1 7669*	Implications for the value of an operation, defined by the maps-to notation with a class abstraction as a result, having an element. Here, the base set of the class abstraction depends on the first operand. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2401. Use the weaker elovmporab1w 7668 when possible. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Jul-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑧 ∈ ⦋𝑥 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ 𝜑})    &   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ V ∧ 𝑌 ∈ V) → ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝑂𝑌) → (𝑋 ∈ V ∧ 𝑌 ∈ V ∧ 𝑍 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀))
Theorem	2mpo0 7670*	If the operation value of the operation value of two nested maps-to notation is not empty, all involved arguments belong to the corresponding base classes of the maps-to notations. (Contributed by AV, 21-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐸)    &   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝑂𝑌) = (𝑠 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐹))    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐷)) → (𝑆(𝑋𝑂𝑌)𝑇) = ∅)
Theorem	relmptopab 7671*	Any function to sets of ordered pairs produces a relation on function value unconditionally. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Aug-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑})    ⇒   ⊢ Rel (𝐹‘𝐵)
Theorem	f1ocnvd 7672*	Describe an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐶) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐷)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ ◡𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐷)))
Theorem	f1od 7673*	Describe an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐶) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐷)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵)
Theorem	f1ocnv2d 7674*	Describe an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥 = 𝐷 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ ◡𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐷)))
Theorem	f1o2d 7675*	Describe an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥 = 𝐷 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵)
Theorem	f1opw2 7676*	A one-to-one mapping induces a one-to-one mapping on power sets. This version of f1opw 7677 avoids the Axiom of Replacement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (◡𝐹 “ 𝑎) ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 “ 𝑏) ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑏 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ↦ (𝐹 “ 𝑏)):𝒫 𝐴–1-1-onto→𝒫 𝐵)
Theorem	f1opw 7677*	A one-to-one mapping induces a one-to-one mapping on power sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → (𝑏 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ↦ (𝐹 “ 𝑏)):𝒫 𝐴–1-1-onto→𝒫 𝐵)
Theorem	elovmpt3imp 7678*	If the value of a function which is the result of an operation defined by the maps-to notation is not empty, the operands must be sets. Remark: a function which is the result of an operation can be regared as operation with 3 operands - therefore the abbreviation "mpt3" is used in the label. (Contributed by AV, 16-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ↦ 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ((𝑋𝑂𝑌)‘𝑍) → (𝑋 ∈ V ∧ 𝑌 ∈ V))
Theorem	ovmpt3rab1 7679*	The value of an operation defined by the maps-to notation with a function into a class abstraction as a result. The domain of the function and the base set of the class abstraction may depend on the operands, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by AV, 16-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ↦ {𝑎 ∈ 𝑁 ∣ 𝜑}))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌) → 𝑀 = 𝐾)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌) → 𝑁 = 𝐿)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝑋𝑂𝑌) = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐾 ↦ {𝑎 ∈ 𝐿 ∣ 𝜓}))
Theorem	ovmpt3rabdm 7680*	If the value of a function which is the result of an operation defined by the maps-to notation is not empty, the operands and the argument of the function must be sets. (Contributed by AV, 16-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ↦ {𝑎 ∈ 𝑁 ∣ 𝜑}))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌) → 𝑀 = 𝐾)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌) → 𝑁 = 𝐿)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝑈) ∧ 𝐿 ∈ 𝑇) → dom (𝑋𝑂𝑌) = 𝐾)
Theorem	elovmpt3rab1 7681*	Implications for the value of an operation defined by the maps-to notation with a function into a class abstraction as a result having an element. The domain of the function and the base set of the class abstraction may depend on the operands, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by AV, 16-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ↦ {𝑎 ∈ 𝑁 ∣ 𝜑}))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌) → 𝑀 = 𝐾)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌) → 𝑁 = 𝐿)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐿 ∈ 𝑇) → (𝐴 ∈ ((𝑋𝑂𝑌)‘𝑍) → ((𝑋 ∈ V ∧ 𝑌 ∈ V) ∧ (𝑍 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐿))))
Theorem	elovmpt3rab 7682*	Implications for the value of an operation defined by the maps-to notation with a class abstraction as a result having an element. (Contributed by AV, 17-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ↦ {𝑎 ∈ 𝑁 ∣ 𝜑}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑇) → (𝐴 ∈ ((𝑋𝑂𝑌)‘𝑍) → ((𝑋 ∈ V ∧ 𝑌 ∈ V) ∧ (𝑍 ∈ 𝑀 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑁))))
2.3.21  Functions with three arguments in maps-to notation
Syntax	cmpt3 7683	Syntax for maps-to notation for functions with three arguments.
class (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐷)
Definition	df-mpt3 7684*	Define maps-to notation for functions with three arguments. See df-mpt 5186 and df-mpo 7425 for functions with one and two arguments respectively. This definition is analogous to bj-dfmpoa 38132. (Contributed by BJ, 11-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐷) = {⟨𝑠, 𝑡⟩ ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 (𝑠 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑡 = 𝐷)}
Theorem	mpt3mpt 7685*	Express a three-argument function as a one-argument function, or vice-versa. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 7-Sep-2026.)
⊢ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧⟩ → 𝐷 = 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ↦ 𝐷) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐸)
Theorem	mpt3eqdv 7686*	An equality deduction for maps-to notation. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 8-Sep-2026.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐺)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶)) → 𝐷 = 𝐻)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐷) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐸, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐹, 𝑧 ∈ 𝐺 ↦ 𝐻))
Theorem	funmpt3 7687*	A function in maps-to notation with three arguments is a function. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 8-Sep-2026.)
⊢ Fun (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐷)
Theorem	mpt3fvd 7688*	Value of a three-argument function in maps-to notation. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 28-Sep-2026.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧⟩) → 𝑌 = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑌)
Theorem	mpt3fvotd 7689*	Value of a three-argument function in maps-to notation at an ordered triple. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 28-Sep-2026.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ⟨𝑅, 𝑆, 𝑇⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧⟩) → 𝑌 = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘⟨𝑅, 𝑆, 𝑇⟩) = 𝑌)
Theorem	mpt3fvot2d 7690*	Value of a three-argument function in maps-to notation at an ordered triple. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 28-Sep-2026.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑅 = 𝑥) → 𝐾 = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑆 = 𝑦) → 𝐿 = 𝐾)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑇 = 𝑧) → 𝑀 = 𝐿)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘⟨𝑅, 𝑆, 𝑇⟩) = 𝑀)
2.3.22  Function operation
Syntax	cof 7691	Extend class notation to include mapping of an operation to a function operation.
class ∘f 𝑅
Syntax	cofr 7692	Extend class notation to include mapping of a binary relation to a function relation.
class ∘r 𝑅
Definition	df-of 7693*	Define the function operation map. The definition is designed so that if 𝑅 is a binary operation, then ∘f 𝑅 is the analogous operation on functions which corresponds to applying 𝑅 pointwise to the values of the functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ∘f 𝑅 = (𝑓 ∈ V, 𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ dom 𝑔) ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑥)𝑅(𝑔‘𝑥))))
Definition	df-ofr 7694*	Define the function relation map. The definition is designed so that if 𝑅 is a binary relation, then ∘r 𝑅 is the analogous relation on functions which is true when each element of the left function relates to the corresponding element of the right function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ∘r 𝑅 = {⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ dom 𝑔)(𝑓‘𝑥)𝑅(𝑔‘𝑥)}
Theorem	ofeqd 7695	Equality theorem for function operation, deduction form. (Contributed by SN, 11-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∘f 𝑅 = ∘f 𝑆)
Theorem	ofeq 7696	Equality theorem for function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → ∘f 𝑅 = ∘f 𝑆)
Theorem	ofreq 7697	Equality theorem for function relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → ∘r 𝑅 = ∘r 𝑆)
Theorem	ofexg 7698	A function operation restricted to a set is a set. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ( ∘f 𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ∈ V)
Theorem	nfof 7699	Hypothesis builder for function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 ∘f 𝑅
Theorem	nfofr 7700	Hypothesis builder for function relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 ∘r 𝑅