Theorem dfco2 5262

Description: Alternate definition of a class composition, using only one bound variable. (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2008.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfco2	|- ( A o. B ) = U_ x e. _V ( ( `' B " { x } ) X. ( A " { x } ) )

Distinct variable groups:   x, A   x, B

Proof of Theorem dfco2

Dummy variables y z are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		relco 5261	. 2 |- Rel ( A o. B )
2		reliun 4873	. . 3 |- ( Rel U_ x e. _V ( ( `' B " { x } ) X. ( A " { x } ) ) <-> A. x e. _V Rel ( ( `' B " { x } ) X. ( A " { x } ) ) )
3		relxp 4859	. . . 4 |- Rel ( ( `' B " { x } ) X. ( A " { x } ) )
4	3	a1i 9	. . 3 |- ( x e. _V -> Rel ( ( `' B " { x } ) X. ( A " { x } ) ) )
5	2, 4	mprgbir 2600	. 2 |- Rel U_ x e. _V ( ( `' B " { x } ) X. ( A " { x } ) )
6		vex 2816	. . . 4 |- y e. _V
7		vex 2816	. . . 4 |- z e. _V
8		opelco2g 4923	. . . 4 |- ( ( y e. _V /\ z e. _V ) -> ( <. y , z >. e. ( A o. B ) <-> E. x ( <. y , x >. e. B /\ <. x , z >. e. A ) ) )
9	6, 7, 8	mp2an 426	. . 3 |- ( <. y , z >. e. ( A o. B ) <-> E. x ( <. y , x >. e. B /\ <. x , z >. e. A ) )
10		eliun 3995	. . . 4 |- ( <. y , z >. e. U_ x e. _V ( ( `' B " { x } ) X. ( A " { x } ) ) <-> E. x e. _V <. y , z >. e. ( ( `' B " { x } ) X. ( A " { x } ) ) )
11		rexv 2832	. . . 4 |- ( E. x e. _V <. y , z >. e. ( ( `' B " { x } ) X. ( A " { x } ) ) <-> E. x <. y , z >. e. ( ( `' B " { x } ) X. ( A " { x } ) ) )
12		opelxp 4779	. . . . . 6 |- ( <. y , z >. e. ( ( `' B " { x } ) X. ( A " { x } ) ) <-> ( y e. ( `' B " { x } ) /\ z e. ( A " { x } ) ) )
13		vex 2816	. . . . . . . . 9 |- x e. _V
14	13, 6	elimasn 5129	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( y e. ( `' B " { x } ) <-> <. x , y >. e. `' B )
15	13, 6	opelcnv 4937	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( <. x , y >. e. `' B <-> <. y , x >. e. B )
16	14, 15	bitri 184	. . . . . . 7 |- ( y e. ( `' B " { x } ) <-> <. y , x >. e. B )
17	13, 7	elimasn 5129	. . . . . . 7 |- ( z e. ( A " { x } ) <-> <. x , z >. e. A )
18	16, 17	anbi12i 460	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( y e. ( `' B " { x } ) /\ z e. ( A " { x } ) ) <-> ( <. y , x >. e. B /\ <. x , z >. e. A ) )
19	12, 18	bitri 184	. . . . 5 |- ( <. y , z >. e. ( ( `' B " { x } ) X. ( A " { x } ) ) <-> ( <. y , x >. e. B /\ <. x , z >. e. A ) )
20	19	exbii 1654	. . . 4 |- ( E. x <. y , z >. e. ( ( `' B " { x } ) X. ( A " { x } ) ) <-> E. x ( <. y , x >. e. B /\ <. x , z >. e. A ) )
21	10, 11, 20	3bitrri 207	. . 3 |- ( E. x ( <. y , x >. e. B /\ <. x , z >. e. A ) <-> <. y , z >. e. U_ x e. _V ( ( `' B " { x } ) X. ( A " { x } ) ) )
22	9, 21	bitri 184	. 2 |- ( <. y , z >. e. ( A o. B ) <-> <. y , z >. e. U_ x e. _V ( ( `' B " { x } ) X. ( A " { x } ) ) )
23	1, 5, 22	eqrelriiv 4844	1 |- ( A o. B ) = U_ x e. _V ( ( `' B " { x } ) X. ( A " { x } ) )

Syntax hints:   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105   = wceq 1398   E.wex 1541   e. wcel 2203   E.wrex 2521   _Vcvv 2813   {csn 3689   <.cop 3692   U_ciun 3991   X. cxp 4747   `'ccnv 4748   "cima 4752   o. ccom 4753   Rel wrel 4754

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 717  ax-5 1496  ax-7 1497  ax-gen 1498  ax-ie1 1542  ax-ie2 1543  ax-8 1553  ax-10 1554  ax-11 1555  ax-i12 1556  ax-bndl 1558  ax-4 1559  ax-17 1575  ax-i9 1579  ax-ial 1583  ax-i5r 1584  ax-14 2206  ax-ext 2214  ax-sep 4228  ax-pow 4287  ax-pr 4322

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1007  df-tru 1401  df-nf 1510  df-sb 1812  df-eu 2083  df-mo 2084  df-clab 2219  df-cleq 2225  df-clel 2228  df-nfc 2373  df-ral 2525  df-rex 2526  df-v 2815  df-sbc 3043  df-un 3215  df-in 3217  df-ss 3224  df-pw 3671  df-sn 3695  df-pr 3696  df-op 3698  df-iun 3993  df-br 4110  df-opab 4172  df-xp 4755  df-rel 4756  df-cnv 4757  df-co 4758  df-dm 4759  df-rn 4760  df-res 4761  df-ima 4762

This theorem is referenced by:  dfco2a  5263