Theorem fvimacnv 5674

Description: The argument of a function value belongs to the preimage of any class containing the function value. Raph Levien remarks: "This proof is unsatisfying, because it seems to me that funimass2 5333 could probably be strengthened to a biconditional." (Contributed by Raph Levien, 20-Nov-2006.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
fvimacnv	|- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) -> ( ( F ` A ) e. B <-> A e. ( `' F " B ) ) )

Proof of Theorem fvimacnv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		funfvop 5671	. . . . 5 |- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) -> <. A , ( F ` A ) >. e. F )
2		funfvex 5572	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) -> ( F ` A ) e. _V )
3		opelcnvg 4843	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ( F ` A ) e. _V /\ A e. dom F ) -> ( <. ( F ` A ) , A >. e. `' F <-> <. A , ( F ` A ) >. e. F ) )
4	2, 3	sylancom 420	. . . . 5 |- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) -> ( <. ( F ` A ) , A >. e. `' F <-> <. A , ( F ` A ) >. e. F ) )
5	1, 4	mpbird 167	. . . 4 |- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) -> <. ( F ` A ) , A >. e. `' F )
6		elimasng 5034	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ( F ` A ) e. _V /\ A e. dom F ) -> ( A e. ( `' F " { ( F ` A ) } ) <-> <. ( F ` A ) , A >. e. `' F ) )
7	2, 6	sylancom 420	. . . 4 |- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) -> ( A e. ( `' F " { ( F ` A ) } ) <-> <. ( F ` A ) , A >. e. `' F ) )
8	5, 7	mpbird 167	. . 3 |- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) -> A e. ( `' F " { ( F ` A ) } ) )
9		snssg 3753	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( ( F ` A ) e. _V -> ( ( F ` A ) e. B <-> { ( F ` A ) } C_ B ) )
10	2, 9	syl 14	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) -> ( ( F ` A ) e. B <-> { ( F ` A ) } C_ B ) )
11		imass2 5042	. . . . . . 7 |- ( { ( F ` A ) } C_ B -> ( `' F " { ( F ` A ) } ) C_ ( `' F " B ) )
12	10, 11	biimtrdi 163	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) -> ( ( F ` A ) e. B -> ( `' F " { ( F ` A ) } ) C_ ( `' F " B ) ) )
13	12	imp 124	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) /\ ( F ` A ) e. B ) -> ( `' F " { ( F ` A ) } ) C_ ( `' F " B ) )
14	13	sseld 3179	. . . 4 |- ( ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) /\ ( F ` A ) e. B ) -> ( A e. ( `' F " { ( F ` A ) } ) -> A e. ( `' F " B ) ) )
15	14	ex 115	. . 3 |- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) -> ( ( F ` A ) e. B -> ( A e. ( `' F " { ( F ` A ) } ) -> A e. ( `' F " B ) ) ) )
16	8, 15	mpid 42	. 2 |- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) -> ( ( F ` A ) e. B -> A e. ( `' F " B ) ) )
17		fvimacnvi 5673	. . . 4 |- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. ( `' F " B ) ) -> ( F ` A ) e. B )
18	17	ex 115	. . 3 |- ( Fun F -> ( A e. ( `' F " B ) -> ( F ` A ) e. B ) )
19	18	adantr 276	. 2 |- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) -> ( A e. ( `' F " B ) -> ( F ` A ) e. B ) )
20	16, 19	impbid 129	1 |- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) -> ( ( F ` A ) e. B <-> A e. ( `' F " B ) ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105   e. wcel 2164   _Vcvv 2760   C_ wss 3154   {csn 3619   <.cop 3622   `'ccnv 4659   dom cdm 4660   "cima 4663   Fun wfun 5249   ` cfv 5255

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1458  ax-7 1459  ax-gen 1460  ax-ie1 1504  ax-ie2 1505  ax-8 1515  ax-10 1516  ax-11 1517  ax-i12 1518  ax-bndl 1520  ax-4 1521  ax-17 1537  ax-i9 1541  ax-ial 1545  ax-i5r 1546  ax-14 2167  ax-ext 2175  ax-sep 4148  ax-pow 4204  ax-pr 4239

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1472  df-sb 1774  df-eu 2045  df-mo 2046  df-clab 2180  df-cleq 2186  df-clel 2189  df-nfc 2325  df-ral 2477  df-rex 2478  df-v 2762  df-sbc 2987  df-un 3158  df-in 3160  df-ss 3167  df-pw 3604  df-sn 3625  df-pr 3626  df-op 3628  df-uni 3837  df-br 4031  df-opab 4092  df-id 4325  df-xp 4666  df-rel 4667  df-cnv 4668  df-co 4669  df-dm 4670  df-rn 4671  df-res 4672  df-ima 4673  df-iota 5216  df-fun 5257  df-fn 5258  df-fv 5263

This theorem is referenced by:  funimass3  5675  elpreima  5678  fisumss  11538  psrbaglesuppg  14169