Theorem fvimacnv 5677

Description: The argument of a function value belongs to the preimage of any class containing the function value. Raph Levien remarks: "This proof is unsatisfying, because it seems to me that funimass2 5336 could probably be strengthened to a biconditional." (Contributed by Raph Levien, 20-Nov-2006.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
fvimacnv	|- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) -> ( ( F ` A ) e. B <-> A e. ( `' F " B ) ) )

Proof of Theorem fvimacnv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		funfvop 5674	. . . . 5 |- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) -> <. A , ( F ` A ) >. e. F )
2		funfvex 5575	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) -> ( F ` A ) e. _V )
3		opelcnvg 4846	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ( F ` A ) e. _V /\ A e. dom F ) -> ( <. ( F ` A ) , A >. e. `' F <-> <. A , ( F ` A ) >. e. F ) )
4	2, 3	sylancom 420	. . . . 5 |- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) -> ( <. ( F ` A ) , A >. e. `' F <-> <. A , ( F ` A ) >. e. F ) )
5	1, 4	mpbird 167	. . . 4 |- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) -> <. ( F ` A ) , A >. e. `' F )
6		elimasng 5037	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ( F ` A ) e. _V /\ A e. dom F ) -> ( A e. ( `' F " { ( F ` A ) } ) <-> <. ( F ` A ) , A >. e. `' F ) )
7	2, 6	sylancom 420	. . . 4 |- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) -> ( A e. ( `' F " { ( F ` A ) } ) <-> <. ( F ` A ) , A >. e. `' F ) )
8	5, 7	mpbird 167	. . 3 |- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) -> A e. ( `' F " { ( F ` A ) } ) )
9		snssg 3756	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( ( F ` A ) e. _V -> ( ( F ` A ) e. B <-> { ( F ` A ) } C_ B ) )
10	2, 9	syl 14	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) -> ( ( F ` A ) e. B <-> { ( F ` A ) } C_ B ) )
11		imass2 5045	. . . . . . 7 |- ( { ( F ` A ) } C_ B -> ( `' F " { ( F ` A ) } ) C_ ( `' F " B ) )
12	10, 11	biimtrdi 163	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) -> ( ( F ` A ) e. B -> ( `' F " { ( F ` A ) } ) C_ ( `' F " B ) ) )
13	12	imp 124	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) /\ ( F ` A ) e. B ) -> ( `' F " { ( F ` A ) } ) C_ ( `' F " B ) )
14	13	sseld 3182	. . . 4 |- ( ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) /\ ( F ` A ) e. B ) -> ( A e. ( `' F " { ( F ` A ) } ) -> A e. ( `' F " B ) ) )
15	14	ex 115	. . 3 |- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) -> ( ( F ` A ) e. B -> ( A e. ( `' F " { ( F ` A ) } ) -> A e. ( `' F " B ) ) ) )
16	8, 15	mpid 42	. 2 |- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) -> ( ( F ` A ) e. B -> A e. ( `' F " B ) ) )
17		fvimacnvi 5676	. . . 4 |- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. ( `' F " B ) ) -> ( F ` A ) e. B )
18	17	ex 115	. . 3 |- ( Fun F -> ( A e. ( `' F " B ) -> ( F ` A ) e. B ) )
19	18	adantr 276	. 2 |- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) -> ( A e. ( `' F " B ) -> ( F ` A ) e. B ) )
20	16, 19	impbid 129	1 |- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) -> ( ( F ` A ) e. B <-> A e. ( `' F " B ) ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105   e. wcel 2167   _Vcvv 2763   C_ wss 3157   {csn 3622   <.cop 3625   `'ccnv 4662   dom cdm 4663   "cima 4666   Fun wfun 5252   ` cfv 5258

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1461  ax-7 1462  ax-gen 1463  ax-ie1 1507  ax-ie2 1508  ax-8 1518  ax-10 1519  ax-11 1520  ax-i12 1521  ax-bndl 1523  ax-4 1524  ax-17 1540  ax-i9 1544  ax-ial 1548  ax-i5r 1549  ax-14 2170  ax-ext 2178  ax-sep 4151  ax-pow 4207  ax-pr 4242

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1475  df-sb 1777  df-eu 2048  df-mo 2049  df-clab 2183  df-cleq 2189  df-clel 2192  df-nfc 2328  df-ral 2480  df-rex 2481  df-v 2765  df-sbc 2990  df-un 3161  df-in 3163  df-ss 3170  df-pw 3607  df-sn 3628  df-pr 3629  df-op 3631  df-uni 3840  df-br 4034  df-opab 4095  df-id 4328  df-xp 4669  df-rel 4670  df-cnv 4671  df-co 4672  df-dm 4673  df-rn 4674  df-res 4675  df-ima 4676  df-iota 5219  df-fun 5260  df-fn 5261  df-fv 5266

This theorem is referenced by:  funimass3  5678  elpreima  5681  fisumss  11557  psrbaglesuppg  14226