Theorem fvimacnv 5718

Description: The argument of a function value belongs to the preimage of any class containing the function value. Raph Levien remarks: "This proof is unsatisfying, because it seems to me that funimass2 5371 could probably be strengthened to a biconditional." (Contributed by Raph Levien, 20-Nov-2006.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
fvimacnv	|- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) -> ( ( F ` A ) e. B <-> A e. ( `' F " B ) ) )

Proof of Theorem fvimacnv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		funfvop 5715	. . . . 5 |- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) -> <. A , ( F ` A ) >. e. F )
2		funfvex 5616	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) -> ( F ` A ) e. _V )
3		opelcnvg 4876	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ( F ` A ) e. _V /\ A e. dom F ) -> ( <. ( F ` A ) , A >. e. `' F <-> <. A , ( F ` A ) >. e. F ) )
4	2, 3	sylancom 420	. . . . 5 |- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) -> ( <. ( F ` A ) , A >. e. `' F <-> <. A , ( F ` A ) >. e. F ) )
5	1, 4	mpbird 167	. . . 4 |- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) -> <. ( F ` A ) , A >. e. `' F )
6		elimasng 5069	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ( F ` A ) e. _V /\ A e. dom F ) -> ( A e. ( `' F " { ( F ` A ) } ) <-> <. ( F ` A ) , A >. e. `' F ) )
7	2, 6	sylancom 420	. . . 4 |- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) -> ( A e. ( `' F " { ( F ` A ) } ) <-> <. ( F ` A ) , A >. e. `' F ) )
8	5, 7	mpbird 167	. . 3 |- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) -> A e. ( `' F " { ( F ` A ) } ) )
9		snssg 3778	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( ( F ` A ) e. _V -> ( ( F ` A ) e. B <-> { ( F ` A ) } C_ B ) )
10	2, 9	syl 14	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) -> ( ( F ` A ) e. B <-> { ( F ` A ) } C_ B ) )
11		imass2 5077	. . . . . . 7 |- ( { ( F ` A ) } C_ B -> ( `' F " { ( F ` A ) } ) C_ ( `' F " B ) )
12	10, 11	biimtrdi 163	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) -> ( ( F ` A ) e. B -> ( `' F " { ( F ` A ) } ) C_ ( `' F " B ) ) )
13	12	imp 124	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) /\ ( F ` A ) e. B ) -> ( `' F " { ( F ` A ) } ) C_ ( `' F " B ) )
14	13	sseld 3200	. . . 4 |- ( ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) /\ ( F ` A ) e. B ) -> ( A e. ( `' F " { ( F ` A ) } ) -> A e. ( `' F " B ) ) )
15	14	ex 115	. . 3 |- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) -> ( ( F ` A ) e. B -> ( A e. ( `' F " { ( F ` A ) } ) -> A e. ( `' F " B ) ) ) )
16	8, 15	mpid 42	. 2 |- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) -> ( ( F ` A ) e. B -> A e. ( `' F " B ) ) )
17		fvimacnvi 5717	. . . 4 |- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. ( `' F " B ) ) -> ( F ` A ) e. B )
18	17	ex 115	. . 3 |- ( Fun F -> ( A e. ( `' F " B ) -> ( F ` A ) e. B ) )
19	18	adantr 276	. 2 |- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) -> ( A e. ( `' F " B ) -> ( F ` A ) e. B ) )
20	16, 19	impbid 129	1 |- ( ( Fun F /\ A e. dom F ) -> ( ( F ` A ) e. B <-> A e. ( `' F " B ) ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105   e. wcel 2178   _Vcvv 2776   C_ wss 3174   {csn 3643   <.cop 3646   `'ccnv 4692   dom cdm 4693   "cima 4696   Fun wfun 5284   ` cfv 5290

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 711  ax-5 1471  ax-7 1472  ax-gen 1473  ax-ie1 1517  ax-ie2 1518  ax-8 1528  ax-10 1529  ax-11 1530  ax-i12 1531  ax-bndl 1533  ax-4 1534  ax-17 1550  ax-i9 1554  ax-ial 1558  ax-i5r 1559  ax-14 2181  ax-ext 2189  ax-sep 4178  ax-pow 4234  ax-pr 4269

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 983  df-tru 1376  df-nf 1485  df-sb 1787  df-eu 2058  df-mo 2059  df-clab 2194  df-cleq 2200  df-clel 2203  df-nfc 2339  df-ral 2491  df-rex 2492  df-v 2778  df-sbc 3006  df-un 3178  df-in 3180  df-ss 3187  df-pw 3628  df-sn 3649  df-pr 3650  df-op 3652  df-uni 3865  df-br 4060  df-opab 4122  df-id 4358  df-xp 4699  df-rel 4700  df-cnv 4701  df-co 4702  df-dm 4703  df-rn 4704  df-res 4705  df-ima 4706  df-iota 5251  df-fun 5292  df-fn 5293  df-fv 5298

This theorem is referenced by:  funimass3  5719  elpreima  5722  fisumss  11818  psrbaglesuppg  14549