Theorem rspceeqv 2948

Description: Restricted existential specialization in an equality, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by BJ, 2-Sep-2022.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
rspceeqv.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspceeqv	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐸 = 𝐷) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐸 = 𝐶)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝑥,𝐷   𝑥,𝐸

Allowed substitution hint:   𝐶(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rspceeqv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rspceeqv.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)
2	1	eqeq2d 2250	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝐸 = 𝐶 ↔ 𝐸 = 𝐷))
3	2	rspcev 2929	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐸 = 𝐷) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐸 = 𝐶)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   = wceq 1402   ∈ wcel 2209  ∃wrex 2529

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-ext 2220

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1405  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-rex 2534  df-v 2823

This theorem is used by:  elixpsn  7017  ixpsnf1o  7018  elfir  7307  0ct  7447  ctmlemr  7448  ctssdclemn0  7450  fodju0  7487  ccats1pfxeqrex  11487  mertenslemi1  12302  mertenslem2  12303  nninfctlemfo  12817  pcprmpw  13113  1arithlem4  13145  ctiunctlemfo  13330  elrestr  13601  lss1d  14720  lspsn  14753  znf1o  14986  restopnb  15282  mopnex  15606  metrest  15607  mpodvdsmulf1o  16104  lgsquadlem1  16196  2sqlem2  16234  mul2sq  16235  2sqlem3  16236  2sqlem9  16243  2sqlem10  16244  nnnninfex  17065