Theorem rspceeqv 2948

Description: Restricted existential specialization in an equality, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by BJ, 2-Sep-2022.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
rspceeqv.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspceeqv	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐸 = 𝐷) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐸 = 𝐶)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝑥,𝐷   𝑥,𝐸

Allowed substitution hint:   𝐶(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rspceeqv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rspceeqv.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)
2	1	eqeq2d 2250	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝐸 = 𝐶 ↔ 𝐸 = 𝐷))
3	2	rspcev 2929	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐸 = 𝐷) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐸 = 𝐶)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   = wceq 1402   ∈ wcel 2209  ∃wrex 2529

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-ext 2220

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1405  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-rex 2534  df-v 2823

This theorem is used by:  elixpsn  7017  ixpsnf1o  7018  elfir  7307  0ct  7448  ctmlemr  7449  ctssdclemn0  7451  fodju0  7488  ccats1pfxeqrex  11503  mertenslemi1  12321  mertenslem2  12322  nninfctlemfo  12836  pcprmpw  13136  1arithlem4  13168  ctiunctlemfo  13382  elrestr  13654  lss1d  14804  lspsn  14837  znf1o  15070  restopnb  15373  mopnex  15697  metrest  15698  mpodvdsmulf1o  16245  lgsquadlem1  16362  2sqlem2  16400  mul2sq  16401  2sqlem3  16402  2sqlem9  16409  2sqlem10  16410  nnnninfex  17231