Theorem rspceeqv 2929

Description: Restricted existential specialization in an equality, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by BJ, 2-Sep-2022.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
rspceeqv.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspceeqv	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐸 = 𝐷) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐸 = 𝐶)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝑥,𝐷   𝑥,𝐸

Allowed substitution hint:   𝐶(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rspceeqv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rspceeqv.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)
2	1	eqeq2d 2243	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝐸 = 𝐶 ↔ 𝐸 = 𝐷))
3	2	rspcev 2911	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐸 = 𝐷) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐸 = 𝐶)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   = wceq 1398   ∈ wcel 2202  ∃wrex 2512

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 717  ax-5 1496  ax-7 1497  ax-gen 1498  ax-ie1 1542  ax-ie2 1543  ax-8 1553  ax-10 1554  ax-11 1555  ax-i12 1556  ax-bndl 1558  ax-4 1559  ax-17 1575  ax-i9 1579  ax-ial 1583  ax-i5r 1584  ax-ext 2213

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1401  df-nf 1510  df-sb 1811  df-clab 2218  df-cleq 2224  df-clel 2227  df-nfc 2364  df-rex 2517  df-v 2805

This theorem is referenced by:  elixpsn  6947  ixpsnf1o  6948  elfir  7232  0ct  7366  ctmlemr  7367  ctssdclemn0  7369  fodju0  7406  ccats1pfxeqrex  11362  mertenslemi1  12176  mertenslem2  12177  nninfctlemfo  12691  pcprmpw  12987  1arithlem4  13019  ctiunctlemfo  13140  elrestr  13410  lss1d  14479  lspsn  14512  znf1o  14747  restopnb  14992  mopnex  15316  metrest  15317  mpodvdsmulf1o  15804  lgsquadlem1  15896  2sqlem2  15934  mul2sq  15935  2sqlem3  15936  2sqlem9  15943  2sqlem10  15944  nnnninfex  16748