Theorem rspceeqv 2942

Description: Restricted existential specialization in an equality, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by BJ, 2-Sep-2022.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
rspceeqv.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspceeqv	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐸 = 𝐷) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐸 = 𝐶)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝑥,𝐷   𝑥,𝐸

Allowed substitution hint:   𝐶(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rspceeqv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rspceeqv.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)
2	1	eqeq2d 2246	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝐸 = 𝐶 ↔ 𝐸 = 𝐷))
3	2	rspcev 2923	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐸 = 𝐷) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐸 = 𝐶)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   = wceq 1398   ∈ wcel 2205  ∃wrex 2523

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 717  ax-5 1496  ax-7 1497  ax-gen 1498  ax-ie1 1542  ax-ie2 1543  ax-8 1553  ax-10 1554  ax-11 1555  ax-i12 1556  ax-bndl 1558  ax-4 1559  ax-17 1575  ax-i9 1579  ax-ial 1583  ax-i5r 1584  ax-ext 2216

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1401  df-nf 1510  df-sb 1812  df-clab 2221  df-cleq 2227  df-clel 2230  df-nfc 2375  df-rex 2528  df-v 2817

This theorem is referenced by:  elixpsn  6983  ixpsnf1o  6984  elfir  7273  0ct  7411  ctmlemr  7412  ctssdclemn0  7414  fodju0  7451  ccats1pfxeqrex  11432  mertenslemi1  12246  mertenslem2  12247  nninfctlemfo  12761  pcprmpw  13057  1arithlem4  13089  ctiunctlemfo  13274  elrestr  13544  lss1d  14657  lspsn  14690  znf1o  14925  restopnb  15172  mopnex  15496  metrest  15497  mpodvdsmulf1o  15984  lgsquadlem1  16076  2sqlem2  16114  mul2sq  16115  2sqlem3  16116  2sqlem9  16123  2sqlem10  16124  nnnninfex  16926