Theorem rspceeqv 2926

Description: Restricted existential specialization in an equality, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by BJ, 2-Sep-2022.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
rspceeqv.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspceeqv	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐸 = 𝐷) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐸 = 𝐶)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝑥,𝐷   𝑥,𝐸

Allowed substitution hint:   𝐶(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rspceeqv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rspceeqv.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)
2	1	eqeq2d 2241	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝐸 = 𝐶 ↔ 𝐸 = 𝐷))
3	2	rspcev 2908	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐸 = 𝐷) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐸 = 𝐶)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   = wceq 1395   ∈ wcel 2200  ∃wrex 2509

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 714  ax-5 1493  ax-7 1494  ax-gen 1495  ax-ie1 1539  ax-ie2 1540  ax-8 1550  ax-10 1551  ax-11 1552  ax-i12 1553  ax-bndl 1555  ax-4 1556  ax-17 1572  ax-i9 1576  ax-ial 1580  ax-i5r 1581  ax-ext 2211

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1398  df-nf 1507  df-sb 1809  df-clab 2216  df-cleq 2222  df-clel 2225  df-nfc 2361  df-rex 2514  df-v 2802

This theorem is referenced by:  elixpsn  6899  ixpsnf1o  6900  elfir  7163  0ct  7297  ctmlemr  7298  ctssdclemn0  7300  fodju0  7337  ccats1pfxeqrex  11286  mertenslemi1  12086  mertenslem2  12087  nninfctlemfo  12601  pcprmpw  12897  1arithlem4  12929  ctiunctlemfo  13050  elrestr  13320  lss1d  14387  lspsn  14420  znf1o  14655  restopnb  14895  mopnex  15219  metrest  15220  mpodvdsmulf1o  15704  lgsquadlem1  15796  2sqlem2  15834  mul2sq  15835  2sqlem3  15836  2sqlem9  15843  2sqlem10  15844  nnnninfex  16560