Theorem rspceeqv 2939

Description: Restricted existential specialization in an equality, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by BJ, 2-Sep-2022.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
rspceeqv.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspceeqv	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐸 = 𝐷) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐸 = 𝐶)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝑥,𝐷   𝑥,𝐸

Allowed substitution hint:   𝐶(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rspceeqv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rspceeqv.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)
2	1	eqeq2d 2244	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝐸 = 𝐶 ↔ 𝐸 = 𝐷))
3	2	rspcev 2921	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐸 = 𝐷) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐸 = 𝐶)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   = wceq 1398   ∈ wcel 2203  ∃wrex 2521

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 717  ax-5 1496  ax-7 1497  ax-gen 1498  ax-ie1 1542  ax-ie2 1543  ax-8 1553  ax-10 1554  ax-11 1555  ax-i12 1556  ax-bndl 1558  ax-4 1559  ax-17 1575  ax-i9 1579  ax-ial 1583  ax-i5r 1584  ax-ext 2214

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1401  df-nf 1510  df-sb 1812  df-clab 2219  df-cleq 2225  df-clel 2228  df-nfc 2373  df-rex 2526  df-v 2815

This theorem is referenced by:  elixpsn  6970  ixpsnf1o  6971  elfir  7260  0ct  7398  ctmlemr  7399  ctssdclemn0  7401  fodju0  7438  ccats1pfxeqrex  11407  mertenslemi1  12221  mertenslem2  12222  nninfctlemfo  12736  pcprmpw  13032  1arithlem4  13064  ctiunctlemfo  13190  elrestr  13460  lss1d  14531  lspsn  14564  znf1o  14799  restopnb  15046  mopnex  15370  metrest  15371  mpodvdsmulf1o  15858  lgsquadlem1  15950  2sqlem2  15988  mul2sq  15989  2sqlem3  15990  2sqlem9  15997  2sqlem10  15998  nnnninfex  16800