Theorem bnj1123 35683

Description: Technical lemma for bnj69 35707. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj1123.4	⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
bnj1123.3	⊢ 𝐾 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)}
bnj1123.1	⊢ (𝜂 ↔ ((𝑓 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑓) → (𝑓‘𝑖) ⊆ 𝐵))
bnj1123.2	⊢ (𝜂′ ↔ [𝑗 / 𝑖]𝜂)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj1123	⊢ (𝜂′ ↔ ((𝑓 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ dom 𝑓) → (𝑓‘𝑗) ⊆ 𝐵))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐵,𝑖   𝐷,𝑖   𝑓,𝑖   𝑖,𝑗   𝑖,𝑛   𝜑,𝑖

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑗, 𝑛)   𝜓(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑖, 𝑗, 𝑛)   𝜂(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑖, 𝑗, 𝑛)   𝐴(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑖, 𝑗, 𝑛)   𝐵(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑗, 𝑛)   𝐷(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑗, 𝑛)   𝑅(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑖, 𝑗, 𝑛)   𝐾(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑖, 𝑗, 𝑛)   𝜂′(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑖, 𝑗, 𝑛)

Proof of Theorem bnj1123

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj1123.2	. 2 ⊢ (𝜂′ ↔ [𝑗 / 𝑖]𝜂)
2		bnj1123.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ ((𝑓 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑓) → (𝑓‘𝑖) ⊆ 𝐵))
3	2	sbcbii 3798	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑗 / 𝑖]𝜂 ↔ [𝑗 / 𝑖]((𝑓 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑓) → (𝑓‘𝑖) ⊆ 𝐵))
4		bnj1123.3	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝐾 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)}
5		nfcv 2926	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑖𝐷
6		nfv 1949	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑖 𝑓 Fn 𝑛
7		nfv 1949	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑖𝜑
8		bnj1123.4	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
9	8	bnj1095 35479	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑖𝜓)
10	9	nf5i 2186	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑖𝜓
11	6, 7, 10	nf3an 1936	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑖(𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)
12	5, 11	nfrexw 3314	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑖∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)
13	12	nfab 2932	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑖{𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)}
14	4, 13	nfcxfr 2924	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑖𝐾
15	14	nfcri 2918	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑖 𝑓 ∈ 𝐾
16		nfv 1949	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑖 𝑗 ∈ dom 𝑓
17	15, 16	nfan 1934	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑖(𝑓 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ dom 𝑓)
18		nfv 1949	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑖(𝑓‘𝑗) ⊆ 𝐵
19	17, 18	nfim 1931	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑖((𝑓 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ dom 𝑓) → (𝑓‘𝑗) ⊆ 𝐵)
20		eleq1w 2847	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑗 → (𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑓 ↔ 𝑗 ∈ dom 𝑓))
21	20	anbi2d 642	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑗 → ((𝑓 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑓) ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ dom 𝑓)))
22		fveq2 6905	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑗 → (𝑓‘𝑖) = (𝑓‘𝑗))
23	22	sseq1d 3944	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑗 → ((𝑓‘𝑖) ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝑓‘𝑗) ⊆ 𝐵))
24	21, 23	imbi12d 347	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑗 → (((𝑓 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑓) → (𝑓‘𝑖) ⊆ 𝐵) ↔ ((𝑓 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ dom 𝑓) → (𝑓‘𝑗) ⊆ 𝐵)))
25	19, 24	sbciegf 3780	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑗 ∈ V → ([𝑗 / 𝑖]((𝑓 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑓) → (𝑓‘𝑖) ⊆ 𝐵) ↔ ((𝑓 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ dom 𝑓) → (𝑓‘𝑗) ⊆ 𝐵)))
26	25	elv 3459	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑗 / 𝑖]((𝑓 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑓) → (𝑓‘𝑖) ⊆ 𝐵) ↔ ((𝑓 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ dom 𝑓) → (𝑓‘𝑗) ⊆ 𝐵))
27	1, 3, 26	3bitri 300	1 ⊢ (𝜂′ ↔ ((𝑓 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ dom 𝑓) → (𝑓‘𝑗) ⊆ 𝐵))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  {cab 2741  ∀wral 3080  ∃wrex 3090  Vcvv 3454  [wsbc 3742   ⊆ wss 3900  ∪ ciun 4954  dom cdm 5655  suc csuc 6379   Fn wfn 6550  ‘cfv 6555  ωcom 7898   predc-bnj14 35386

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-br 5107  df-iota 6509  df-fv 6563

This theorem is used by:  bnj1030  35684