Theorem ordequn 6366

Description: The maximum (i.e. union) of two ordinals is either one or the other. Similar to Exercise 14 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 40. (Contributed by NM, 28-Nov-2003.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ordequn	⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ Ord 𝐶) → (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶)))

Proof of Theorem ordequn

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ordtri2or2 6362	. . 3 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ Ord 𝐶) → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ∨ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵))
2	1	orcomd 868	. 2 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ Ord 𝐶) → (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶))
3		ssequn2 4117	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) = 𝐵)
4		eqeq1 2742	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) = 𝐵))
5	3, 4	bitr4id 290	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
6		ssequn1 4114	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) = 𝐶)
7		eqeq1 2742	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → (𝐴 = 𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) = 𝐶))
8	6, 7	bitr4id 290	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐶))
9	5, 8	orbi12d 916	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → ((𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶)))
10	2, 9	syl5ibcom 244	1 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ Ord 𝐶) → (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 396   ∨ wo 844   = wceq 1539   ∪ cun 3885   ⊆ wss 3887  Ord word 6265

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-11 2154  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5223  ax-nul 5230  ax-pr 5352

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1783  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2816  df-ne 2944  df-ral 3069  df-rex 3070  df-rab 3073  df-v 3434  df-dif 3890  df-un 3892  df-in 3894  df-ss 3904  df-pss 3906  df-nul 4257  df-if 4460  df-pw 4535  df-sn 4562  df-pr 4564  df-op 4568  df-uni 4840  df-br 5075  df-opab 5137  df-tr 5192  df-eprel 5495  df-po 5503  df-so 5504  df-fr 5544  df-we 5546  df-ord 6269

This theorem is referenced by:  ordun  6367  inar1  10531