Theorem ordequn 6259

Description: The maximum (i.e. union) of two ordinals is either one or the other. Similar to Exercise 14 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 40. (Contributed by NM, 28-Nov-2003.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ordequn	⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ Ord 𝐶) → (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶)))

Proof of Theorem ordequn

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ordtri2or2 6255	. . 3 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ Ord 𝐶) → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ∨ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵))
2	1	orcomd 868	. 2 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ Ord 𝐶) → (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶))
3		ssequn2 4110	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) = 𝐵)
4		eqeq1 2802	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) = 𝐵))
5	3, 4	bitr4id 293	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
6		ssequn1 4107	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) = 𝐶)
7		eqeq1 2802	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → (𝐴 = 𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) = 𝐶))
8	6, 7	bitr4id 293	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐶))
9	5, 8	orbi12d 916	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → ((𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶)))
10	2, 9	syl5ibcom 248	1 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ Ord 𝐶) → (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 399   ∨ wo 844   = wceq 1538   ∪ cun 3879   ⊆ wss 3881  Ord word 6158

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2770  ax-sep 5167  ax-nul 5174  ax-pr 5295

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 845  df-3or 1085  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1541  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2598  df-eu 2629  df-clab 2777  df-cleq 2791  df-clel 2870  df-nfc 2938  df-ne 2988  df-ral 3111  df-rex 3112  df-rab 3115  df-v 3443  df-sbc 3721  df-dif 3884  df-un 3886  df-in 3888  df-ss 3898  df-pss 3900  df-nul 4244  df-if 4426  df-sn 4526  df-pr 4528  df-op 4532  df-uni 4801  df-br 5031  df-opab 5093  df-tr 5137  df-eprel 5430  df-po 5438  df-so 5439  df-fr 5478  df-we 5480  df-ord 6162

This theorem is referenced by:  ordun  6260  inar1  10186