Theorem ordequn 6470

Description: The maximum (i.e. union) of two ordinals is either one or the other. Similar to Exercise 14 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 40. (Contributed by NM, 28-Nov-2003.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ordequn	⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ Ord 𝐶) → (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶)))

Proof of Theorem ordequn

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ordtri2or2 6466	. . 3 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ Ord 𝐶) → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ∨ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵))
2	1	orcomd 885	. 2 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ Ord 𝐶) → (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶))
3		ssequn2 4142	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) = 𝐵)
4		eqeq1 2769	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) = 𝐵))
5	3, 4	bitr4id 293	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
6		ssequn1 4139	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) = 𝐶)
7		eqeq1 2769	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → (𝐴 = 𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) = 𝐶))
8	6, 7	bitr4id 293	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐶))
9	5, 8	orbi12d 932	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → ((𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶)))
10	2, 9	syl5ibcom 248	1 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ Ord 𝐶) → (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∨ wo 861   = wceq 1570   ∪ cun 3904   ⊆ wss 3906  Ord word 6363

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-ext 2737  ax-sep 5259  ax-pr 5406

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-ne 2961  df-ral 3082  df-rex 3092  df-rab 3419  df-v 3459  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-pss 3926  df-nul 4287  df-if 4490  df-pw 4566  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4875  df-br 5112  df-opab 5176  df-tr 5221  df-eprel 5563  df-po 5571  df-so 5572  df-fr 5616  df-we 5618  df-ord 6367

This theorem is used by:  ordun  6471  inar1  10777