Theorem subgrfun 29889

Description: The edge function of a subgraph of a graph whose edge function is actually a function is a function. (Contributed by AV, 20-Nov-2020.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
subgrfun	⊢ ((Fun (iEdg‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑆 SubGraph 𝐺) → Fun (iEdg‘𝑆))

Proof of Theorem subgrfun

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqid 2763	. . . 4 ⊢ (Vtx‘𝑆) = (Vtx‘𝑆)
2		eqid 2763	. . . 4 ⊢ (Vtx‘𝐺) = (Vtx‘𝐺)
3		eqid 2763	. . . 4 ⊢ (iEdg‘𝑆) = (iEdg‘𝑆)
4		eqid 2763	. . . 4 ⊢ (iEdg‘𝐺) = (iEdg‘𝐺)
5		eqid 2763	. . . 4 ⊢ (Edg‘𝑆) = (Edg‘𝑆)
6	1, 2, 3, 4, 5	subgrprop2 29882	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑆 SubGraph 𝐺 → ((Vtx‘𝑆) ⊆ (Vtx‘𝐺) ∧ (iEdg‘𝑆) ⊆ (iEdg‘𝐺) ∧ (Edg‘𝑆) ⊆ 𝒫 (Vtx‘𝑆)))
7		funss 6575	. . . 4 ⊢ ((iEdg‘𝑆) ⊆ (iEdg‘𝐺) → (Fun (iEdg‘𝐺) → Fun (iEdg‘𝑆)))
8	7	3ad2ant2 1152	. . 3 ⊢ (((Vtx‘𝑆) ⊆ (Vtx‘𝐺) ∧ (iEdg‘𝑆) ⊆ (iEdg‘𝐺) ∧ (Edg‘𝑆) ⊆ 𝒫 (Vtx‘𝑆)) → (Fun (iEdg‘𝐺) → Fun (iEdg‘𝑆)))
9	6, 8	syl 18	. 2 ⊢ (𝑆 SubGraph 𝐺 → (Fun (iEdg‘𝐺) → Fun (iEdg‘𝑆)))
10	9	impcom 413	1 ⊢ ((Fun (iEdg‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑆 SubGraph 𝐺) → Fun (iEdg‘𝑆))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   ⊆ wss 3900  𝒫 cpw 4560   class class class wbr 5106  Fun wfun 6549  ‘cfv 6555  Vtxcvtx 29601  iEdgciedg 29602  Edgcedg 29652   SubGraph csubgr 29875

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5252  ax-pr 5395

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2102  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-br 5107  df-opab 5171  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-res 5667  df-iota 6509  df-fun 6557  df-fv 6563  df-subgr 29876

This theorem is used by:  subgruhgrfun  29890