Theorem dmcosseq 5054

Description: Domain of a composition. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dmcosseq	|- ( ran B C_ dom A -> dom ( A o. B ) = dom B )

Proof of Theorem dmcosseq

Dummy variables x y z are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dmcoss 5052	. . 3 |- dom ( A o. B ) C_ dom B
2	1	a1i 9	. 2 |- ( ran B C_ dom A -> dom ( A o. B ) C_ dom B )
3		ssel 3242	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( ran B C_ dom A -> ( y e. ran B -> y e. dom A ) )
4		vex 2824	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- y e. _V
5	4	elrn 5025	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( y e. ran B <-> E. x x B y )
6	4	eldm 4978	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( y e. dom A <-> E. z y A z )
7	5, 6	imbi12i 239	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( ( y e. ran B -> y e. dom A ) <-> ( E. x x B y -> E. z y A z ) )
8		19.8a 1643	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- ( x B y -> E. x x B y )
9	8	imim1i 60	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( ( E. x x B y -> E. z y A z ) -> ( x B y -> E. z y A z ) )
10		pm3.2 139	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- ( x B y -> ( y A z -> ( x B y /\ y A z ) ) )
11	10	eximdv 1933	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( x B y -> ( E. z y A z -> E. z ( x B y /\ y A z ) ) )
12	9, 11	sylcom 28	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( ( E. x x B y -> E. z y A z ) -> ( x B y -> E. z ( x B y /\ y A z ) ) )
13	7, 12	sylbi 121	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( ( y e. ran B -> y e. dom A ) -> ( x B y -> E. z ( x B y /\ y A z ) ) )
14	3, 13	syl 14	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ran B C_ dom A -> ( x B y -> E. z ( x B y /\ y A z ) ) )
15	14	eximdv 1933	. . . . . 6 |- ( ran B C_ dom A -> ( E. y x B y -> E. y E. z ( x B y /\ y A z ) ) )
16		excom 1716	. . . . . 6 |- ( E. z E. y ( x B y /\ y A z ) <-> E. y E. z ( x B y /\ y A z ) )
17	15, 16	imbitrrdi 162	. . . . 5 |- ( ran B C_ dom A -> ( E. y x B y -> E. z E. y ( x B y /\ y A z ) ) )
18		vex 2824	. . . . . . 7 |- x e. _V
19		vex 2824	. . . . . . 7 |- z e. _V
20	18, 19	opelco 4952	. . . . . 6 |- ( <. x , z >. e. ( A o. B ) <-> E. y ( x B y /\ y A z ) )
21	20	exbii 1658	. . . . 5 |- ( E. z <. x , z >. e. ( A o. B ) <-> E. z E. y ( x B y /\ y A z ) )
22	17, 21	imbitrrdi 162	. . . 4 |- ( ran B C_ dom A -> ( E. y x B y -> E. z <. x , z >. e. ( A o. B ) ) )
23	18	eldm 4978	. . . 4 |- ( x e. dom B <-> E. y x B y )
24	18	eldm2 4979	. . . 4 |- ( x e. dom ( A o. B ) <-> E. z <. x , z >. e. ( A o. B ) )
25	22, 23, 24	3imtr4g 205	. . 3 |- ( ran B C_ dom A -> ( x e. dom B -> x e. dom ( A o. B ) ) )
26	25	ssrdv 3254	. 2 |- ( ran B C_ dom A -> dom B C_ dom ( A o. B ) )
27	2, 26	eqssd 3265	1 |- ( ran B C_ dom A -> dom ( A o. B ) = dom B )

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   = wceq 1402   E.wex 1545   e. wcel 2209   C_ wss 3220   <.cop 3712   class class class wbr 4130   dom cdm 4774   ran crn 4775   o. ccom 4778

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-sep 4249  ax-pow 4311  ax-pr 4346

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1011  df-tru 1405  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-eu 2089  df-mo 2090  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-v 2823  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-pw 3690  df-sn 3715  df-pr 3716  df-op 3718  df-br 4131  df-opab 4193  df-cnv 4782  df-co 4783  df-dm 4784  df-rn 4785

This theorem is used by:  dmcoeq  5055  fnco  5491