Theorem dmcosseq 5010

Description: Domain of a composition. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dmcosseq	|- ( ran B C_ dom A -> dom ( A o. B ) = dom B )

Proof of Theorem dmcosseq

Dummy variables x y z are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dmcoss 5008	. . 3 |- dom ( A o. B ) C_ dom B
2	1	a1i 9	. 2 |- ( ran B C_ dom A -> dom ( A o. B ) C_ dom B )
3		ssel 3222	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( ran B C_ dom A -> ( y e. ran B -> y e. dom A ) )
4		vex 2806	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- y e. _V
5	4	elrn 4981	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( y e. ran B <-> E. x x B y )
6	4	eldm 4934	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( y e. dom A <-> E. z y A z )
7	5, 6	imbi12i 239	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( ( y e. ran B -> y e. dom A ) <-> ( E. x x B y -> E. z y A z ) )
8		19.8a 1639	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- ( x B y -> E. x x B y )
9	8	imim1i 60	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( ( E. x x B y -> E. z y A z ) -> ( x B y -> E. z y A z ) )
10		pm3.2 139	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- ( x B y -> ( y A z -> ( x B y /\ y A z ) ) )
11	10	eximdv 1928	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( x B y -> ( E. z y A z -> E. z ( x B y /\ y A z ) ) )
12	9, 11	sylcom 28	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( ( E. x x B y -> E. z y A z ) -> ( x B y -> E. z ( x B y /\ y A z ) ) )
13	7, 12	sylbi 121	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( ( y e. ran B -> y e. dom A ) -> ( x B y -> E. z ( x B y /\ y A z ) ) )
14	3, 13	syl 14	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ran B C_ dom A -> ( x B y -> E. z ( x B y /\ y A z ) ) )
15	14	eximdv 1928	. . . . . 6 |- ( ran B C_ dom A -> ( E. y x B y -> E. y E. z ( x B y /\ y A z ) ) )
16		excom 1712	. . . . . 6 |- ( E. z E. y ( x B y /\ y A z ) <-> E. y E. z ( x B y /\ y A z ) )
17	15, 16	imbitrrdi 162	. . . . 5 |- ( ran B C_ dom A -> ( E. y x B y -> E. z E. y ( x B y /\ y A z ) ) )
18		vex 2806	. . . . . . 7 |- x e. _V
19		vex 2806	. . . . . . 7 |- z e. _V
20	18, 19	opelco 4908	. . . . . 6 |- ( <. x , z >. e. ( A o. B ) <-> E. y ( x B y /\ y A z ) )
21	20	exbii 1654	. . . . 5 |- ( E. z <. x , z >. e. ( A o. B ) <-> E. z E. y ( x B y /\ y A z ) )
22	17, 21	imbitrrdi 162	. . . 4 |- ( ran B C_ dom A -> ( E. y x B y -> E. z <. x , z >. e. ( A o. B ) ) )
23	18	eldm 4934	. . . 4 |- ( x e. dom B <-> E. y x B y )
24	18	eldm2 4935	. . . 4 |- ( x e. dom ( A o. B ) <-> E. z <. x , z >. e. ( A o. B ) )
25	22, 23, 24	3imtr4g 205	. . 3 |- ( ran B C_ dom A -> ( x e. dom B -> x e. dom ( A o. B ) ) )
26	25	ssrdv 3234	. 2 |- ( ran B C_ dom A -> dom B C_ dom ( A o. B ) )
27	2, 26	eqssd 3245	1 |- ( ran B C_ dom A -> dom ( A o. B ) = dom B )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   = wceq 1398   E.wex 1541   e. wcel 2202   C_ wss 3201   <.cop 3676   class class class wbr 4093   dom cdm 4731   ran crn 4732   o. ccom 4735

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 717  ax-5 1496  ax-7 1497  ax-gen 1498  ax-ie1 1542  ax-ie2 1543  ax-8 1553  ax-10 1554  ax-11 1555  ax-i12 1556  ax-bndl 1558  ax-4 1559  ax-17 1575  ax-i9 1579  ax-ial 1583  ax-i5r 1584  ax-14 2205  ax-ext 2213  ax-sep 4212  ax-pow 4270  ax-pr 4305

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1007  df-tru 1401  df-nf 1510  df-sb 1811  df-eu 2082  df-mo 2083  df-clab 2218  df-cleq 2224  df-clel 2227  df-nfc 2364  df-v 2805  df-un 3205  df-in 3207  df-ss 3214  df-pw 3658  df-sn 3679  df-pr 3680  df-op 3682  df-br 4094  df-opab 4156  df-cnv 4739  df-co 4740  df-dm 4741  df-rn 4742

This theorem is referenced by:  dmcoeq  5011  fnco  5447