Theorem dmcosseq 5054

Description: Domain of a composition. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dmcosseq	⊢ (ran 𝐵 ⊆ dom 𝐴 → dom (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = dom 𝐵)

Proof of Theorem dmcosseq

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dmcoss 5052	. . 3 ⊢ dom (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ⊆ dom 𝐵
2	1	a1i 9	. 2 ⊢ (ran 𝐵 ⊆ dom 𝐴 → dom (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ⊆ dom 𝐵)
3		ssel 3242	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (ran 𝐵 ⊆ dom 𝐴 → (𝑦 ∈ ran 𝐵 → 𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐴))
4		vex 2824	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
5	4	elrn 5025	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ran 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥𝐵𝑦)
6	4	eldm 4978	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑧 𝑦𝐴𝑧)
7	5, 6	imbi12i 239	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ ran 𝐵 → 𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐴) ↔ (∃𝑥 𝑥𝐵𝑦 → ∃𝑧 𝑦𝐴𝑧))
8		19.8a 1643	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑥𝐵𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥𝐵𝑦)
9	8	imim1i 60	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((∃𝑥 𝑥𝐵𝑦 → ∃𝑧 𝑦𝐴𝑧) → (𝑥𝐵𝑦 → ∃𝑧 𝑦𝐴𝑧))
10		pm3.2 139	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑥𝐵𝑦 → (𝑦𝐴𝑧 → (𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧)))
11	10	eximdv 1933	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥𝐵𝑦 → (∃𝑧 𝑦𝐴𝑧 → ∃𝑧(𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧)))
12	9, 11	sylcom 28	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((∃𝑥 𝑥𝐵𝑦 → ∃𝑧 𝑦𝐴𝑧) → (𝑥𝐵𝑦 → ∃𝑧(𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧)))
13	7, 12	sylbi 121	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ ran 𝐵 → 𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐴) → (𝑥𝐵𝑦 → ∃𝑧(𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧)))
14	3, 13	syl 14	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (ran 𝐵 ⊆ dom 𝐴 → (𝑥𝐵𝑦 → ∃𝑧(𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧)))
15	14	eximdv 1933	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (ran 𝐵 ⊆ dom 𝐴 → (∃𝑦 𝑥𝐵𝑦 → ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧)))
16		excom 1716	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑧∃𝑦(𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧) ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧))
17	15, 16	imbitrrdi 162	. . . . 5 ⊢ (ran 𝐵 ⊆ dom 𝐴 → (∃𝑦 𝑥𝐵𝑦 → ∃𝑧∃𝑦(𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧)))
18		vex 2824	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
19		vex 2824	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑧 ∈ V
20	18, 19	opelco 4952	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧))
21	20	exbii 1658	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑧⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑦(𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧))
22	17, 21	imbitrrdi 162	. . . 4 ⊢ (ran 𝐵 ⊆ dom 𝐴 → (∃𝑦 𝑥𝐵𝑦 → ∃𝑧⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵)))
23	18	eldm 4978	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑥𝐵𝑦)
24	18	eldm2 4979	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ dom (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑧⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵))
25	22, 23, 24	3imtr4g 205	. . 3 ⊢ (ran 𝐵 ⊆ dom 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐵 → 𝑥 ∈ dom (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵)))
26	25	ssrdv 3254	. 2 ⊢ (ran 𝐵 ⊆ dom 𝐴 → dom 𝐵 ⊆ dom (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵))
27	2, 26	eqssd 3265	1 ⊢ (ran 𝐵 ⊆ dom 𝐴 → dom (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = dom 𝐵)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   = wceq 1402  ∃wex 1545   ∈ wcel 2209   ⊆ wss 3220  ⟨cop 3712   class class class wbr 4130  dom cdm 4774  ran crn 4775   ∘ ccom 4778

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-sep 4249  ax-pow 4311  ax-pr 4346

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1011  df-tru 1405  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-eu 2089  df-mo 2090  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-v 2823  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-pw 3690  df-sn 3715  df-pr 3716  df-op 3718  df-br 4131  df-opab 4193  df-cnv 4782  df-co 4783  df-dm 4784  df-rn 4785

This theorem is used by:  dmcoeq  5055  fnco  5491