Theorem exmidexmid 4230

Description: EXMID implies that an arbitrary proposition is decidable. That is, EXMID captures the usual meaning of excluded middle when stated in terms of propositions.

To get other propositional statements which are equivalent to excluded middle, combine this with notnotrdc 844, peircedc 915, or condc 854.

(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Jun-2022.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
exmidexmid	⊢ (EXMID → DECID 𝜑)

Proof of Theorem exmidexmid

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ssrab2 3269	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {∅}
2		df-exmid 4229	. . . 4 ⊢ (EXMID ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ {∅} → DECID ∅ ∈ 𝑥))
3		p0ex 4222	. . . . . 6 ⊢ {∅} ∈ V
4	3	rabex 4178	. . . . 5 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V
5		sseq1 3207	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → (𝑥 ⊆ {∅} ↔ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {∅}))
6		eleq2 2260	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → (∅ ∈ 𝑥 ↔ ∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}))
7	6	dcbid 839	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → (DECID ∅ ∈ 𝑥 ↔ DECID ∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}))
8	5, 7	imbi12d 234	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → ((𝑥 ⊆ {∅} → DECID ∅ ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ({𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {∅} → DECID ∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑})))
9	4, 8	spcv 2858	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ {∅} → DECID ∅ ∈ 𝑥) → ({𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {∅} → DECID ∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}))
10	2, 9	sylbi 121	. . 3 ⊢ (EXMID → ({𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {∅} → DECID ∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}))
11	1, 10	mpi 15	. 2 ⊢ (EXMID → DECID ∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑})
12		0ex 4161	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
13	12	snid 3654	. . . 4 ⊢ ∅ ∈ {∅}
14		biidd 172	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
15	14	elrab 2920	. . . 4 ⊢ (∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (∅ ∈ {∅} ∧ 𝜑))
16	13, 15	mpbiran 942	. . 3 ⊢ (∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑)
17	16	dcbii 841	. 2 ⊢ (DECID ∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ↔ DECID 𝜑)
18	11, 17	sylib 122	1 ⊢ (EXMID → DECID 𝜑)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4  DECID wdc 835  ∀wal 1362   = wceq 1364   ∈ wcel 2167  {crab 2479   ⊆ wss 3157  ∅c0 3451  {csn 3623  EXMIDwem 4228

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 710  ax-5 1461  ax-7 1462  ax-gen 1463  ax-ie1 1507  ax-ie2 1508  ax-8 1518  ax-10 1519  ax-11 1520  ax-i12 1521  ax-bndl 1523  ax-4 1524  ax-17 1540  ax-i9 1544  ax-ial 1548  ax-i5r 1549  ax-14 2170  ax-ext 2178  ax-sep 4152  ax-nul 4160  ax-pow 4208

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-dc 836  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1475  df-sb 1777  df-clab 2183  df-cleq 2189  df-clel 2192  df-nfc 2328  df-rab 2484  df-v 2765  df-dif 3159  df-in 3163  df-ss 3170  df-nul 3452  df-pw 3608  df-sn 3629  df-exmid 4229

This theorem is referenced by:  exmidn0m  4235  exmid0el  4238  exmidel  4239  exmidundif  4240  exmidundifim  4241  exmidpw2en  6982  sbthlemi3  7034  sbthlemi5  7036  sbthlemi6  7037  exmidomniim  7216  exmidfodomrlemim  7280  exmidontriimlem1  7304  exmidapne  7343