Theorem exmidexmid 4311

Description: EXMID implies that an arbitrary proposition is decidable. That is, EXMID captures the usual meaning of excluded middle when stated in terms of propositions.

To get other propositional statements which are equivalent to excluded middle, combine this with notnotrdc 851, peircedc 922, or condc 861.

(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Jun-2022.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
exmidexmid	⊢ (EXMID → DECID 𝜑)

Proof of Theorem exmidexmid

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ssrab2 3325	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {∅}
2		df-exmid 4310	. . . 4 ⊢ (EXMID ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ {∅} → DECID ∅ ∈ 𝑥))
3		p0ex 4303	. . . . . 6 ⊢ {∅} ∈ V
4	3	rabex 4258	. . . . 5 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V
5		sseq1 3263	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → (𝑥 ⊆ {∅} ↔ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {∅}))
6		eleq2 2298	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → (∅ ∈ 𝑥 ↔ ∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}))
7	6	dcbid 846	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → (DECID ∅ ∈ 𝑥 ↔ DECID ∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}))
8	5, 7	imbi12d 234	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → ((𝑥 ⊆ {∅} → DECID ∅ ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ({𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {∅} → DECID ∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑})))
9	4, 8	spcv 2913	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ {∅} → DECID ∅ ∈ 𝑥) → ({𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {∅} → DECID ∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}))
10	2, 9	sylbi 121	. . 3 ⊢ (EXMID → ({𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {∅} → DECID ∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}))
11	1, 10	mpi 15	. 2 ⊢ (EXMID → DECID ∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑})
12		0ex 4239	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
13	12	snid 3722	. . . 4 ⊢ ∅ ∈ {∅}
14		biidd 172	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
15	14	elrab 2975	. . . 4 ⊢ (∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (∅ ∈ {∅} ∧ 𝜑))
16	13, 15	mpbiran 949	. . 3 ⊢ (∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑)
17	16	dcbii 848	. 2 ⊢ (DECID ∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ↔ DECID 𝜑)
18	11, 17	sylib 122	1 ⊢ (EXMID → DECID 𝜑)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4  DECID wdc 842  ∀wal 1396   = wceq 1398   ∈ wcel 2205  {crab 2526   ⊆ wss 3213  ∅c0 3510  {csn 3691  EXMIDwem 4309

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-io 717  ax-5 1496  ax-7 1497  ax-gen 1498  ax-ie1 1542  ax-ie2 1543  ax-8 1553  ax-10 1554  ax-11 1555  ax-i12 1556  ax-bndl 1558  ax-4 1559  ax-17 1575  ax-i9 1579  ax-ial 1583  ax-i5r 1584  ax-14 2208  ax-ext 2216  ax-sep 4230  ax-nul 4238  ax-pow 4289

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-dc 843  df-tru 1401  df-nf 1510  df-sb 1812  df-clab 2221  df-cleq 2227  df-clel 2230  df-nfc 2375  df-rab 2531  df-v 2817  df-dif 3215  df-in 3219  df-ss 3226  df-nul 3511  df-pw 3673  df-sn 3697  df-exmid 4310

This theorem is referenced by:  exmidn0m  4316  exmid0el  4319  exmidel  4320  exmidundif  4321  exmidundifim  4322  exmidpw2en  7174  exmidssfi  7201  sbthlemi3  7231  sbthlemi5  7233  sbthlemi6  7234  exmidomniim  7434  exmidfodomrlemim  7506  exmidontriimlem1  7530  exmidapne  7579  pw1dceq  16827  exmidnotnotr  16828  exmidcon  16829  exmidpeirce  16830