Theorem exmidexmid 4128

Description: EXMID implies that an arbitrary proposition is decidable. That is, EXMID captures the usual meaning of excluded middle when stated in terms of propositions.

To get other propositional statements which are equivalent to excluded middle, combine this with notnotrdc 829, peircedc 900, or condc 839.

(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Jun-2022.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
exmidexmid	⊢ (EXMID → DECID 𝜑)

Proof of Theorem exmidexmid

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ssrab2 3187	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {∅}
2		df-exmid 4127	. . . 4 ⊢ (EXMID ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ {∅} → DECID ∅ ∈ 𝑥))
3		p0ex 4120	. . . . . 6 ⊢ {∅} ∈ V
4	3	rabex 4080	. . . . 5 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V
5		sseq1 3125	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → (𝑥 ⊆ {∅} ↔ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {∅}))
6		eleq2 2204	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → (∅ ∈ 𝑥 ↔ ∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}))
7	6	dcbid 824	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → (DECID ∅ ∈ 𝑥 ↔ DECID ∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}))
8	5, 7	imbi12d 233	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → ((𝑥 ⊆ {∅} → DECID ∅ ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ({𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {∅} → DECID ∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑})))
9	4, 8	spcv 2783	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ {∅} → DECID ∅ ∈ 𝑥) → ({𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {∅} → DECID ∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}))
10	2, 9	sylbi 120	. . 3 ⊢ (EXMID → ({𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {∅} → DECID ∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}))
11	1, 10	mpi 15	. 2 ⊢ (EXMID → DECID ∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑})
12		0ex 4063	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
13	12	snid 3563	. . . 4 ⊢ ∅ ∈ {∅}
14		biidd 171	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
15	14	elrab 2844	. . . 4 ⊢ (∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (∅ ∈ {∅} ∧ 𝜑))
16	13, 15	mpbiran 925	. . 3 ⊢ (∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑)
17	16	dcbii 826	. 2 ⊢ (DECID ∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ↔ DECID 𝜑)
18	11, 17	sylib 121	1 ⊢ (EXMID → DECID 𝜑)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4  DECID wdc 820  ∀wal 1330   = wceq 1332   ∈ wcel 1481  {crab 2421   ⊆ wss 3076  ∅c0 3368  {csn 3532  EXMIDwem 4126

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 604  ax-in2 605  ax-io 699  ax-5 1424  ax-7 1425  ax-gen 1426  ax-ie1 1470  ax-ie2 1471  ax-8 1483  ax-10 1484  ax-11 1485  ax-i12 1486  ax-bndl 1487  ax-4 1488  ax-14 1493  ax-17 1507  ax-i9 1511  ax-ial 1515  ax-i5r 1516  ax-ext 2122  ax-sep 4054  ax-nul 4062  ax-pow 4106

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-dc 821  df-tru 1335  df-nf 1438  df-sb 1737  df-clab 2127  df-cleq 2133  df-clel 2136  df-nfc 2271  df-rab 2426  df-v 2691  df-dif 3078  df-in 3082  df-ss 3089  df-nul 3369  df-pw 3517  df-sn 3538  df-exmid 4127

This theorem is referenced by:  exmidn0m  4132  exmid0el  4135  exmidel  4136  exmidundif  4137  exmidundifim  4138  sbthlemi3  6855  sbthlemi5  6857  sbthlemi6  6858  exmidomniim  7021  exmidfodomrlemim  7074