Theorem ovmpodv2 6212

Description: Alternate deduction version of ovmpo 6214, suitable for iteration. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ovmpodv2.1	|- ( ph -> A e. C )
ovmpodv2.2	|- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> B e. D )
ovmpodv2.3	|- ( ( ph /\ ( x = A /\ y = B ) ) -> R e. V )
ovmpodv2.4	|- ( ( ph /\ ( x = A /\ y = B ) ) -> R = S )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ovmpodv2	|- ( ph -> ( F = ( x e. C , y e. D |-> R ) -> ( A F B ) = S ) )

Distinct variable groups:   x, y, A   x, B, y   ph, x, y   x, S, y

Allowed substitution hints:   C( x, y)   D( x, y)   R( x, y)   F( x, y)   V( x, y)

Proof of Theorem ovmpodv2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqidd 2239	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( x e. C , y e. D |-> R ) = ( x e. C , y e. D |-> R ) )
2		ovmpodv2.1	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> A e. C )
3		ovmpodv2.2	. . . 4 |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> B e. D )
4		ovmpodv2.3	. . . 4 |- ( ( ph /\ ( x = A /\ y = B ) ) -> R e. V )
5		ovmpodv2.4	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ph /\ ( x = A /\ y = B ) ) -> R = S )
6	5	eqeq2d 2250	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ph /\ ( x = A /\ y = B ) ) -> ( ( A ( x e. C , y e. D |-> R ) B ) = R <-> ( A ( x e. C , y e. D |-> R ) B ) = S ) )
7	6	biimpd 144	. . . 4 |- ( ( ph /\ ( x = A /\ y = B ) ) -> ( ( A ( x e. C , y e. D |-> R ) B ) = R -> ( A ( x e. C , y e. D |-> R ) B ) = S ) )
8		nfmpo1 6145	. . . 4 |- F/_ x ( x e. C , y e. D |-> R )
9		nfcv 2392	. . . . . 6 |- F/_ x A
10		nfcv 2392	. . . . . 6 |- F/_ x B
11	9, 8, 10	nfov 6105	. . . . 5 |- F/_ x ( A ( x e. C , y e. D |-> R ) B )
12	11	nfeq1 2402	. . . 4 |- F/ x ( A ( x e. C , y e. D |-> R ) B ) = S
13		nfmpo2 6146	. . . 4 |- F/_ y ( x e. C , y e. D |-> R )
14		nfcv 2392	. . . . . 6 |- F/_ y A
15		nfcv 2392	. . . . . 6 |- F/_ y B
16	14, 13, 15	nfov 6105	. . . . 5 |- F/_ y ( A ( x e. C , y e. D |-> R ) B )
17	16	nfeq1 2402	. . . 4 |- F/ y ( A ( x e. C , y e. D |-> R ) B ) = S
18	2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17	ovmpodf 6210	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( ( x e. C , y e. D |-> R ) = ( x e. C , y e. D |-> R ) -> ( A ( x e. C , y e. D |-> R ) B ) = S ) )
19	1, 18	mpd 13	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( A ( x e. C , y e. D |-> R ) B ) = S )
20		oveq 6081	. . 3 |- ( F = ( x e. C , y e. D |-> R ) -> ( A F B ) = ( A ( x e. C , y e. D |-> R ) B ) )
21	20	eqeq1d 2247	. 2 |- ( F = ( x e. C , y e. D |-> R ) -> ( ( A F B ) = S <-> ( A ( x e. C , y e. D |-> R ) B ) = S ) )
22	19, 21	syl5ibrcom 157	1 |- ( ph -> ( F = ( x e. C , y e. D |-> R ) -> ( A F B ) = S ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   = wceq 1402   e. wcel 2209  (class class class)co 6075   e. cmpo 6077

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 623  ax-in2 624  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-sep 4244  ax-pow 4306  ax-pr 4341  ax-setind 4679

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1011  df-tru 1405  df-fal 1408  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-eu 2089  df-mo 2090  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ne 2421  df-ral 2533  df-rex 2534  df-v 2823  df-sbc 3052  df-dif 3222  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-pw 3687  df-sn 3711  df-pr 3712  df-op 3714  df-uni 3931  df-br 4126  df-opab 4188  df-id 4433  df-xp 4775  df-rel 4776  df-cnv 4777  df-co 4778  df-dm 4779  df-iota 5332  df-fun 5374  df-fv 5380  df-ov 6078  df-oprab 6079  df-mpo 6080

This theorem is referenced by: (None)