| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > brabga | GIF version | ||
| Description: The law of concretion for a binary relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2013.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| opelopabga.1 | ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
| brabga.2 | ⊢ 𝑅 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| brabga | ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝜓)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | df-br 4035 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ 𝑅) | |
| 2 | brabga.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝑅 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} | |
| 3 | 2 | eleq2i 2263 | . . 3 ⊢ (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ 𝑅 ↔ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑}) |
| 4 | 1, 3 | bitri 184 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑}) |
| 5 | opelopabga.1 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
| 6 | 5 | opelopabga 4298 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓)) |
| 7 | 4, 6 | bitrid 192 | 1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝜓)) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 104 ↔ wb 105 = wceq 1364 ∈ wcel 2167 〈cop 3626 class class class wbr 4034 {copab 4094 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 710 ax-5 1461 ax-7 1462 ax-gen 1463 ax-ie1 1507 ax-ie2 1508 ax-8 1518 ax-10 1519 ax-11 1520 ax-i12 1521 ax-bndl 1523 ax-4 1524 ax-17 1540 ax-i9 1544 ax-ial 1548 ax-i5r 1549 ax-14 2170 ax-ext 2178 ax-sep 4152 ax-pow 4208 ax-pr 4243 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-3an 982 df-tru 1367 df-nf 1475 df-sb 1777 df-eu 2048 df-mo 2049 df-clab 2183 df-cleq 2189 df-clel 2192 df-nfc 2328 df-v 2765 df-un 3161 df-in 3163 df-ss 3170 df-pw 3608 df-sn 3629 df-pr 3630 df-op 3632 df-br 4035 df-opab 4096 |
| This theorem is referenced by: braba 4302 brabg 4304 epelg 4326 brcog 4834 fmptco 5731 ofrfval 6148 clim 11463 isstruct2im 12713 isstruct2r 12714 eqgval 13429 dvdsrd 13726 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |