| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > brabga | GIF version | ||
| Description: The law of concretion for a binary relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2013.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| opelopabga.1 | ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
| brabga.2 | ⊢ 𝑅 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| brabga | ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝜓)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | df-br 4060 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ 𝑅) | |
| 2 | brabga.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝑅 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} | |
| 3 | 2 | eleq2i 2274 | . . 3 ⊢ (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ 𝑅 ↔ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑}) |
| 4 | 1, 3 | bitri 184 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑}) |
| 5 | opelopabga.1 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
| 6 | 5 | opelopabga 4327 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓)) |
| 7 | 4, 6 | bitrid 192 | 1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝜓)) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 104 ↔ wb 105 = wceq 1373 ∈ wcel 2178 〈cop 3646 class class class wbr 4059 {copab 4120 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 711 ax-5 1471 ax-7 1472 ax-gen 1473 ax-ie1 1517 ax-ie2 1518 ax-8 1528 ax-10 1529 ax-11 1530 ax-i12 1531 ax-bndl 1533 ax-4 1534 ax-17 1550 ax-i9 1554 ax-ial 1558 ax-i5r 1559 ax-14 2181 ax-ext 2189 ax-sep 4178 ax-pow 4234 ax-pr 4269 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-3an 983 df-tru 1376 df-nf 1485 df-sb 1787 df-eu 2058 df-mo 2059 df-clab 2194 df-cleq 2200 df-clel 2203 df-nfc 2339 df-v 2778 df-un 3178 df-in 3180 df-ss 3187 df-pw 3628 df-sn 3649 df-pr 3650 df-op 3652 df-br 4060 df-opab 4122 |
| This theorem is referenced by: braba 4331 brabg 4333 epelg 4355 brcog 4863 fmptco 5769 ofrfval 6190 clim 11707 isstruct2im 12957 isstruct2r 12958 eqgval 13674 dvdsrd 13971 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |