| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > brabga | GIF version | ||
| Description: The law of concretion for a binary relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2013.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| opelopabga.1 | ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
| brabga.2 | ⊢ 𝑅 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| brabga | ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝜓)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | df-br 4084 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ 𝑅) | |
| 2 | brabga.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝑅 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} | |
| 3 | 2 | eleq2i 2296 | . . 3 ⊢ (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ 𝑅 ↔ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑}) |
| 4 | 1, 3 | bitri 184 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑}) |
| 5 | opelopabga.1 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
| 6 | 5 | opelopabga 4351 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓)) |
| 7 | 4, 6 | bitrid 192 | 1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝜓)) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 104 ↔ wb 105 = wceq 1395 ∈ wcel 2200 〈cop 3669 class class class wbr 4083 {copab 4144 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 714 ax-5 1493 ax-7 1494 ax-gen 1495 ax-ie1 1539 ax-ie2 1540 ax-8 1550 ax-10 1551 ax-11 1552 ax-i12 1553 ax-bndl 1555 ax-4 1556 ax-17 1572 ax-i9 1576 ax-ial 1580 ax-i5r 1581 ax-14 2203 ax-ext 2211 ax-sep 4202 ax-pow 4258 ax-pr 4293 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-3an 1004 df-tru 1398 df-nf 1507 df-sb 1809 df-eu 2080 df-mo 2081 df-clab 2216 df-cleq 2222 df-clel 2225 df-nfc 2361 df-v 2801 df-un 3201 df-in 3203 df-ss 3210 df-pw 3651 df-sn 3672 df-pr 3673 df-op 3675 df-br 4084 df-opab 4146 |
| This theorem is referenced by: braba 4355 brabg 4357 epelg 4381 brcog 4889 fmptco 5801 ofrfval 6227 clim 11792 isstruct2im 13042 isstruct2r 13043 eqgval 13760 dvdsrd 14058 isausgren 15965 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |