| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > brabga | GIF version | ||
| Description: The law of concretion for a binary relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2013.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| opelopabga.1 | ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
| brabga.2 | ⊢ 𝑅 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| brabga | ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝜓)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | df-br 4045 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ 𝑅) | |
| 2 | brabga.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝑅 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} | |
| 3 | 2 | eleq2i 2272 | . . 3 ⊢ (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ 𝑅 ↔ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑}) |
| 4 | 1, 3 | bitri 184 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑}) |
| 5 | opelopabga.1 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
| 6 | 5 | opelopabga 4309 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓)) |
| 7 | 4, 6 | bitrid 192 | 1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝜓)) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 104 ↔ wb 105 = wceq 1373 ∈ wcel 2176 〈cop 3636 class class class wbr 4044 {copab 4104 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 711 ax-5 1470 ax-7 1471 ax-gen 1472 ax-ie1 1516 ax-ie2 1517 ax-8 1527 ax-10 1528 ax-11 1529 ax-i12 1530 ax-bndl 1532 ax-4 1533 ax-17 1549 ax-i9 1553 ax-ial 1557 ax-i5r 1558 ax-14 2179 ax-ext 2187 ax-sep 4162 ax-pow 4218 ax-pr 4253 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-3an 983 df-tru 1376 df-nf 1484 df-sb 1786 df-eu 2057 df-mo 2058 df-clab 2192 df-cleq 2198 df-clel 2201 df-nfc 2337 df-v 2774 df-un 3170 df-in 3172 df-ss 3179 df-pw 3618 df-sn 3639 df-pr 3640 df-op 3642 df-br 4045 df-opab 4106 |
| This theorem is referenced by: braba 4313 brabg 4315 epelg 4337 brcog 4845 fmptco 5746 ofrfval 6167 clim 11592 isstruct2im 12842 isstruct2r 12843 eqgval 13559 dvdsrd 13856 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |