Theorem suc11g 4655

Description: The successor operation behaves like a one-to-one function (assuming the Axiom of Set Induction). Similar to Exercise 35 of [Enderton] p. 208 and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 25-Oct-2003.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
suc11g	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem suc11g

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		en2lp 4652	. . . 4 ⊢ ¬ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
2		sucidg 4513	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐵)
3		eleq2 2295	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 ↔ 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐵))
4	2, 3	syl5ibrcom 157	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴))
5		elsucg 4501	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴)))
6	4, 5	sylibd 149	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴)))
7	6	imp 124	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴))
8	7	3adant1 1041	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴))
9		sucidg 4513	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴)
10		eleq2 2295	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵))
11	9, 10	syl5ibcom 155	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵))
12		elsucg 4501	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
13	11, 12	sylibd 149	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
14	13	imp 124	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
15	14	3adant2 1042	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
16	8, 15	jca 306	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
17		eqcom 2233	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
18	17	orbi2i 769	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
19	18	anbi1i 458	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) ↔ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
20	16, 19	sylib 122	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
21		ordir 824	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵) ↔ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
22	20, 21	sylibr 134	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
23	22	ord 731	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → (¬ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
24	1, 23	mpi 15	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
25	24	3expia 1231	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
26		suceq 4499	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵)
27	25, 26	impbid1 142	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105   ∨ wo 715   ∧ w3a 1004   = wceq 1397   ∈ wcel 2202  suc csuc 4462

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-io 716  ax-5 1495  ax-7 1496  ax-gen 1497  ax-ie1 1541  ax-ie2 1542  ax-8 1552  ax-10 1553  ax-11 1554  ax-i12 1555  ax-bndl 1557  ax-4 1558  ax-17 1574  ax-i9 1578  ax-ial 1582  ax-i5r 1583  ax-ext 2213  ax-setind 4635

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1006  df-tru 1400  df-nf 1509  df-sb 1811  df-clab 2218  df-cleq 2224  df-clel 2227  df-nfc 2363  df-ral 2515  df-v 2804  df-dif 3202  df-un 3204  df-sn 3675  df-pr 3676  df-suc 4468

This theorem is referenced by:  suc11  4656  peano4  4695  frecsuclem  6571