Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next > Nearby theorems Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  suc11g GIF version

Theorem suc11g 4472
 Description: The successor operation behaves like a one-to-one function (assuming the Axiom of Set Induction). Similar to Exercise 35 of [Enderton] p. 208 and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 25-Oct-2003.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
suc11g ((𝐴𝑉𝐵𝑊) → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem suc11g
StepHypRef Expression
1 en2lp 4469 . . . 4 ¬ (𝐵𝐴𝐴𝐵)
2 sucidg 4338 . . . . . . . . . . . 12 (𝐵𝑊𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐵)
3 eleq2 2203 . . . . . . . . . . . 12 (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐵))
42, 3syl5ibrcom 156 . . . . . . . . . . 11 (𝐵𝑊 → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴))
5 elsucg 4326 . . . . . . . . . . 11 (𝐵𝑊 → (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 ↔ (𝐵𝐴𝐵 = 𝐴)))
64, 5sylibd 148 . . . . . . . . . 10 (𝐵𝑊 → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → (𝐵𝐴𝐵 = 𝐴)))
76imp 123 . . . . . . . . 9 ((𝐵𝑊 ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → (𝐵𝐴𝐵 = 𝐴))
873adant1 999 . . . . . . . 8 ((𝐴𝑉𝐵𝑊 ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → (𝐵𝐴𝐵 = 𝐴))
9 sucidg 4338 . . . . . . . . . . . 12 (𝐴𝑉𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴)
10 eleq2 2203 . . . . . . . . . . . 12 (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵))
119, 10syl5ibcom 154 . . . . . . . . . . 11 (𝐴𝑉 → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵))
12 elsucg 4326 . . . . . . . . . . 11 (𝐴𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵)))
1311, 12sylibd 148 . . . . . . . . . 10 (𝐴𝑉 → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → (𝐴𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵)))
1413imp 123 . . . . . . . . 9 ((𝐴𝑉 ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → (𝐴𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵))
15143adant2 1000 . . . . . . . 8 ((𝐴𝑉𝐵𝑊 ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → (𝐴𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵))
168, 15jca 304 . . . . . . 7 ((𝐴𝑉𝐵𝑊 ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → ((𝐵𝐴𝐵 = 𝐴) ∧ (𝐴𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵)))
17 eqcom 2141 . . . . . . . . 9 (𝐵 = 𝐴𝐴 = 𝐵)
1817orbi2i 751 . . . . . . . 8 ((𝐵𝐴𝐵 = 𝐴) ↔ (𝐵𝐴𝐴 = 𝐵))
1918anbi1i 453 . . . . . . 7 (((𝐵𝐴𝐵 = 𝐴) ∧ (𝐴𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵)) ↔ ((𝐵𝐴𝐴 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵)))
2016, 19sylib 121 . . . . . 6 ((𝐴𝑉𝐵𝑊 ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → ((𝐵𝐴𝐴 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵)))
21 ordir 806 . . . . . 6 (((𝐵𝐴𝐴𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵) ↔ ((𝐵𝐴𝐴 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵)))
2220, 21sylibr 133 . . . . 5 ((𝐴𝑉𝐵𝑊 ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → ((𝐵𝐴𝐴𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
2322ord 713 . . . 4 ((𝐴𝑉𝐵𝑊 ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → (¬ (𝐵𝐴𝐴𝐵) → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
241, 23mpi 15 . . 3 ((𝐴𝑉𝐵𝑊 ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
25243expia 1183 . 2 ((𝐴𝑉𝐵𝑊) → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵))
26 suceq 4324 . 2 (𝐴 = 𝐵 → suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵)
2725, 26impbid1 141 1 ((𝐴𝑉𝐵𝑊) → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵))
 Colors of variables: wff set class Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   ↔ wb 104   ∨ wo 697   ∧ w3a 962   = wceq 1331   ∈ wcel 1480  suc csuc 4287 This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 603  ax-in2 604  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2121  ax-setind 4452 This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 964  df-tru 1334  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-clab 2126  df-cleq 2132  df-clel 2135  df-nfc 2270  df-ral 2421  df-v 2688  df-dif 3073  df-un 3075  df-sn 3533  df-pr 3534  df-suc 4293 This theorem is referenced by:  suc11  4473  peano4  4511  frecsuclem  6303
 Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator