| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > 3anim123d | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Deduction joining 3 implications to form implication of conjunctions. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2005.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| 3anim123d.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) |
| 3anim123d.2 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)) |
| 3anim123d.3 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| 3anim123d | ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜁))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3anim123d.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) | |
| 2 | 3anim123d.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | anim12d 621 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏))) |
| 4 | 3anim123d.3 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)) | |
| 5 | 3, 4 | anim12d 621 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜂) → ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜁))) |
| 6 | df-3an 1105 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜂)) | |
| 7 | df-3an 1105 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜁) ↔ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜁)) | |
| 8 | 5, 6, 7 | 3imtr4g 299 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜁))) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ∧ wa 401 ∧ w3a 1103 |
| This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 |
| This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-3an 1105 |
| This theorem is used by: pofun 5584 isopolem 7384 mpt3fvot2d 7722 issmo2 8395 smores 8398 inawina 10814 gchina 10823 repswcshw 15005 coprmprod 16880 issubmnd 19003 issubg2 19402 issubrng2 20861 issubrg2 20895 rnglidlmsgrp 21585 rnglidlrng 21586 ocv2ss 22034 issubassa3 22229 sslm 23672 cmetcaulem 25664 bdayfinbndlem1 28910 axcontlem4 29602 axcontlem8 29606 redwlk 30308 subgrpth 30413 clwwlknwwlksn 30686 numclwwlk1lem2foa 31012 dipsubdir 31507 constrconj 34488 onprcf1acwevdlem1 36086 cgr3tr4 37032 idinside 37064 ftc1anclem7 38885 fzmul 38941 fdc1 38946 rngosubdi 39145 rngosubdir 39146 cdlemg33a 42029 grtrimap 49319 grimgrtri 49320 grlimgrtri 49374 upwlkwlk 49510 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |