![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > 3anim123d | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Deduction joining 3 implications to form implication of conjunctions. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2005.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
3anim123d.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) |
3anim123d.2 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)) |
3anim123d.3 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
3anim123d | ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜁))) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 3anim123d.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) | |
2 | 3anim123d.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)) | |
3 | 1, 2 | anim12d 610 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏))) |
4 | 3anim123d.3 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)) | |
5 | 3, 4 | anim12d 610 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜂) → ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜁))) |
6 | df-3an 1090 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜂)) | |
7 | df-3an 1090 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜁) ↔ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜁)) | |
8 | 5, 6, 7 | 3imtr4g 296 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜁))) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 397 ∧ w3a 1088 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 398 df-3an 1090 |
This theorem is referenced by: pofun 5606 isopolem 7339 issmo2 8346 smores 8349 inawina 10682 gchina 10691 repswcshw 14759 coprmprod 16595 issubmnd 18649 issubg2 19016 issubrg2 20376 ocv2ss 21218 issubassa3 21412 sslm 22795 cmetcaulem 24797 axcontlem4 28215 axcontlem8 28219 redwlk 28919 clwwlknwwlksn 29281 numclwwlk1lem2foa 29597 dipsubdir 30089 subgrpth 34114 cgr3tr4 35013 idinside 35045 ftc1anclem7 36556 fzmul 36598 fdc1 36603 rngosubdi 36802 rngosubdir 36803 cdlemg33a 39566 upwlkwlk 46504 issubrng2 46722 rnglidlmsgrp 46740 rnglidlrng 46741 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |