| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > 3anim123d | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Deduction joining 3 implications to form implication of conjunctions. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2005.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| 3anim123d.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) |
| 3anim123d.2 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)) |
| 3anim123d.3 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| 3anim123d | ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜁))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3anim123d.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) | |
| 2 | 3anim123d.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | anim12d 615 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏))) |
| 4 | 3anim123d.3 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)) | |
| 5 | 3, 4 | anim12d 615 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜂) → ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜁))) |
| 6 | df-3an 1094 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜂)) | |
| 7 | df-3an 1094 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜁) ↔ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜁)) | |
| 8 | 5, 6, 7 | 3imtr4g 297 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜁))) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 396 ∧ w3a 1092 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 208 df-an 397 df-3an 1094 |
| This theorem is referenced by: pofun 5551 isopolem 7296 issmo2 8286 smores 8289 inawina 10611 gchina 10620 repswcshw 14772 coprmprod 16628 issubmnd 18727 issubg2 19115 issubrng2 20537 issubrg2 20571 rnglidlmsgrp 21246 rnglidlrng 21247 ocv2ss 21655 issubassa3 21848 sslm 23289 cmetcaulem 25280 bdayfinbndlem1 28484 axcontlem4 29061 axcontlem8 29065 redwlk 29764 clwwlknwwlksn 30133 numclwwlk1lem2foa 30449 dipsubdir 30944 constrconj 33936 subgrpth 35369 cgr3tr4 36287 idinside 36319 ftc1anclem7 38073 fzmul 38115 fdc1 38120 rngosubdi 38319 rngosubdir 38320 cdlemg33a 41205 grtrimap 48446 grimgrtri 48447 grlimgrtri 48501 upwlkwlk 48637 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |