| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > 3anim123d | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Deduction joining 3 implications to form implication of conjunctions. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2005.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| 3anim123d.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) |
| 3anim123d.2 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)) |
| 3anim123d.3 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| 3anim123d | ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜁))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3anim123d.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) | |
| 2 | 3anim123d.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | anim12d 620 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏))) |
| 4 | 3anim123d.3 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)) | |
| 5 | 3, 4 | anim12d 620 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜂) → ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜁))) |
| 6 | df-3an 1103 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜂)) | |
| 7 | df-3an 1103 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜁) ↔ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜁)) | |
| 8 | 5, 6, 7 | 3imtr4g 299 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜁))) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 400 ∧ w3a 1101 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 401 df-3an 1103 |
| This theorem is referenced by: pofun 5577 isopolem 7333 issmo2 8324 smores 8327 inawina 10663 gchina 10672 repswcshw 14837 coprmprod 16707 issubmnd 18807 issubg2 19196 issubrng2 20631 issubrg2 20665 rnglidlmsgrp 21342 rnglidlrng 21343 ocv2ss 21780 issubassa3 21973 sslm 23413 cmetcaulem 25404 bdayfinbndlem1 28614 axcontlem4 29222 axcontlem8 29226 redwlk 29925 clwwlknwwlksn 30294 numclwwlk1lem2foa 30610 dipsubdir 31105 constrconj 34047 subgrpth 35492 cgr3tr4 36410 idinside 36442 ftc1anclem7 38205 fzmul 38247 fdc1 38252 rngosubdi 38451 rngosubdir 38452 cdlemg33a 41337 grtrimap 48569 grimgrtri 48570 grlimgrtri 48624 upwlkwlk 48760 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |