| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > 3anim123d | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Deduction joining 3 implications to form implication of conjunctions. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2005.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| 3anim123d.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) |
| 3anim123d.2 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)) |
| 3anim123d.3 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| 3anim123d | ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜁))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3anim123d.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) | |
| 2 | 3anim123d.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | anim12d 618 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏))) |
| 4 | 3anim123d.3 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)) | |
| 5 | 3, 4 | anim12d 618 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜂) → ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜁))) |
| 6 | df-3an 1099 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜂)) | |
| 7 | df-3an 1099 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜁) ↔ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜁)) | |
| 8 | 5, 6, 7 | 3imtr4g 298 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜁))) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 399 ∧ w3a 1097 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 209 df-an 400 df-3an 1099 |
| This theorem is referenced by: pofun 5569 isopolem 7323 issmo2 8313 smores 8316 inawina 10641 gchina 10650 repswcshw 14818 coprmprod 16685 issubmnd 18785 issubg2 19173 issubrng2 20594 issubrg2 20628 rnglidlmsgrp 21303 rnglidlrng 21304 ocv2ss 21712 issubassa3 21905 sslm 23346 cmetcaulem 25337 bdayfinbndlem1 28547 axcontlem4 29124 axcontlem8 29128 redwlk 29827 clwwlknwwlksn 30196 numclwwlk1lem2foa 30512 dipsubdir 31007 constrconj 34002 subgrpth 35444 cgr3tr4 36362 idinside 36394 ftc1anclem7 38158 fzmul 38200 fdc1 38205 rngosubdi 38404 rngosubdir 38405 cdlemg33a 41290 grtrimap 48530 grimgrtri 48531 grlimgrtri 48585 upwlkwlk 48721 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |