| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > 3anim123d | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Deduction joining 3 implications to form implication of conjunctions. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2005.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| 3anim123d.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) |
| 3anim123d.2 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)) |
| 3anim123d.3 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| 3anim123d | ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜁))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3anim123d.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) | |
| 2 | 3anim123d.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | anim12d 621 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏))) |
| 4 | 3anim123d.3 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)) | |
| 5 | 3, 4 | anim12d 621 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜂) → ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜁))) |
| 6 | df-3an 1105 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜂)) | |
| 7 | df-3an 1105 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜁) ↔ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜁)) | |
| 8 | 5, 6, 7 | 3imtr4g 299 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜁))) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ∧ wa 401 ∧ w3a 1103 |
| This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 |
| This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-3an 1105 |
| This theorem is used by: pofun 5577 isopolem 7351 mpt3fvot2d 7688 issmo2 8350 smores 8353 inawina 10768 gchina 10777 repswcshw 14956 coprmprod 16829 issubmnd 18946 issubg2 19345 issubrng2 20803 issubrg2 20837 rnglidlmsgrp 21527 rnglidlrng 21528 ocv2ss 21972 issubassa3 22167 sslm 23610 cmetcaulem 25602 bdayfinbndlem1 28846 axcontlem4 29538 axcontlem8 29542 redwlk 30244 subgrpth 30349 clwwlknwwlksn 30622 numclwwlk1lem2foa 30948 dipsubdir 31443 constrconj 34370 cgr3tr4 36797 idinside 36829 ftc1anclem7 38597 fzmul 38655 fdc1 38660 rngosubdi 38859 rngosubdir 38860 cdlemg33a 41743 grtrimap 49015 grimgrtri 49016 grlimgrtri 49070 upwlkwlk 49206 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |