Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > 3anim123d | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Deduction joining 3 implications to form implication of conjunctions. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2005.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
3anim123d.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) |
3anim123d.2 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)) |
3anim123d.3 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
3anim123d | ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜁))) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 3anim123d.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) | |
2 | 3anim123d.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)) | |
3 | 1, 2 | anim12d 612 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏))) |
4 | 3anim123d.3 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)) | |
5 | 3, 4 | anim12d 612 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜂) → ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜁))) |
6 | df-3an 1091 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜂)) | |
7 | df-3an 1091 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜁) ↔ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜁)) | |
8 | 5, 6, 7 | 3imtr4g 299 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜁))) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 399 ∧ w3a 1089 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 400 df-3an 1091 |
This theorem is referenced by: pofun 5483 isopolem 7151 issmo2 8083 smores 8086 inawina 10301 gchina 10310 repswcshw 14374 coprmprod 16215 issubmnd 18197 issubg2 18555 issubrg2 19817 ocv2ss 20632 issubassa3 20824 sslm 22193 cmetcaulem 24182 axcontlem4 27055 axcontlem8 27059 redwlk 27757 clwwlknwwlksn 28118 numclwwlk1lem2foa 28434 dipsubdir 28926 subgrpth 32806 poxp3 33530 cgr3tr4 34088 idinside 34120 ftc1anclem7 35591 fzmul 35634 fdc1 35639 rngosubdi 35838 rngosubdir 35839 cdlemg33a 38455 upwlkwlk 44972 lidlmsgrp 45155 lidlrng 45156 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |