| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > 3anim123d | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Deduction joining 3 implications to form implication of conjunctions. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2005.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| 3anim123d.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) |
| 3anim123d.2 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)) |
| 3anim123d.3 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| 3anim123d | ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜁))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3anim123d.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) | |
| 2 | 3anim123d.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | anim12d 609 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏))) |
| 4 | 3anim123d.3 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)) | |
| 5 | 3, 4 | anim12d 609 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜂) → ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜁))) |
| 6 | df-3an 1088 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜂)) | |
| 7 | df-3an 1088 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜁) ↔ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜁)) | |
| 8 | 5, 6, 7 | 3imtr4g 296 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜁))) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 395 ∧ w3a 1086 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-3an 1088 |
| This theorem is referenced by: pofun 5567 isopolem 7323 issmo2 8321 smores 8324 inawina 10650 gchina 10659 repswcshw 14784 coprmprod 16638 issubmnd 18695 issubg2 19080 issubrng2 20474 issubrg2 20508 rnglidlmsgrp 21163 rnglidlrng 21164 ocv2ss 21589 issubassa3 21782 sslm 23193 cmetcaulem 25195 axcontlem4 28901 axcontlem8 28905 redwlk 29607 clwwlknwwlksn 29974 numclwwlk1lem2foa 30290 dipsubdir 30784 constrconj 33742 subgrpth 35128 cgr3tr4 36047 idinside 36079 ftc1anclem7 37700 fzmul 37742 fdc1 37747 rngosubdi 37946 rngosubdir 37947 cdlemg33a 40707 grtrimap 47951 grimgrtri 47952 grlimgrtri 47999 upwlkwlk 48131 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |