| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > 3anim123d | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Deduction joining 3 implications to form implication of conjunctions. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2005.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| 3anim123d.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) |
| 3anim123d.2 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)) |
| 3anim123d.3 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| 3anim123d | ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜁))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3anim123d.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) | |
| 2 | 3anim123d.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | anim12d 621 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏))) |
| 4 | 3anim123d.3 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)) | |
| 5 | 3, 4 | anim12d 621 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜂) → ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜁))) |
| 6 | df-3an 1105 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜂)) | |
| 7 | df-3an 1105 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜁) ↔ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜁)) | |
| 8 | 5, 6, 7 | 3imtr4g 299 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜁))) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ∧ wa 401 ∧ w3a 1103 |
| This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 |
| This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-3an 1105 |
| This theorem is used by: pofun 5592 isopolem 7354 issmo2 8345 smores 8348 inawina 10693 gchina 10702 repswcshw 14875 coprmprod 16744 issubmnd 18848 issubg2 19239 issubrng2 20694 issubrg2 20728 rnglidlmsgrp 21417 rnglidlrng 21418 ocv2ss 21860 issubassa3 22053 sslm 23493 cmetcaulem 25484 bdayfinbndlem1 28697 axcontlem4 29354 axcontlem8 29358 redwlk 30057 clwwlknwwlksn 30426 numclwwlk1lem2foa 30742 dipsubdir 31237 constrconj 34166 subgrpth 35647 cgr3tr4 36565 idinside 36597 ftc1anclem7 38391 fzmul 38433 fdc1 38438 rngosubdi 38637 rngosubdir 38638 cdlemg33a 41521 grtrimap 48754 grimgrtri 48755 grlimgrtri 48809 upwlkwlk 48945 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |