Users' Mathboxes Mathbox for Peter Mazsa < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >   Mathboxes  >  dfrefrel3 Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem dfrefrel3 39345
Description: Alternate definition of the reflexive relation predicate. A relation is reflexive iff: for all elements on its domain and range, if an element of its domain is the same as an element of its range, then there is the relation between them.

Note that this is definitely not the definition we are accustomed to, like e.g. idref 7143 / idrefALT 6107 or df-reflexive 50698 (𝑅Reflexive𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴) ∧ ∀𝑥𝐴𝑥𝑅𝑥)). It turns out that the not-surprising definition which contains 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑟𝑥𝑟𝑥 needs symmetry as well, see refsymrels3 39399. Only when this symmetry condition holds, like in case of equivalence relations, see dfeqvrels3 39422, can we write the traditional form 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑟𝑥𝑟𝑥 for reflexive relations. For the special case with square Cartesian product when the two forms are equivalent see idinxpssinxp4 39075 where (∀𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐴(𝑥 = 𝑦𝑥𝑅𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥𝐴𝑥𝑅𝑥). See also similar definition of the converse reflexive relations class dfcnvrefrel3 39360. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 8-Jul-2019.)

Assertion
Ref Expression
dfrefrel3 ( RefRel 𝑅 ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑅(𝑥 = 𝑦𝑥𝑅𝑦) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦

Proof of Theorem dfrefrel3
StepHypRef Expression
1 dfrefrel2 39344 . 2 ( RefRel 𝑅 ↔ (( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅))
2 idinxpss 39067 . . 3 (( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑅(𝑥 = 𝑦𝑥𝑅𝑦))
32anbi1i 636 . 2 ((( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑅(𝑥 = 𝑦𝑥𝑅𝑦) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
41, 3bitri 278 1 ( RefRel 𝑅 ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑅(𝑥 = 𝑦𝑥𝑅𝑦) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:  wi 4  wb 209  wa 401  wral 3076  cin 3898  wss 3899   class class class wbr 5103   I cid 5549   × cxp 5653  dom cdm 5655  ran crn 5656  Rel wrel 5660   RefRel wrefrel 38938
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5251  ax-pr 5398
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-id 5550  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-refrel 39341
This theorem is used by:  refsymrel3  39401
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator