Users' Mathboxes Mathbox for Peter Mazsa < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >   Mathboxes  >  dfrefrel3 Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem dfrefrel3 39286
Description: Alternate definition of the reflexive relation predicate. A relation is reflexive iff: for all elements on its domain and range, if an element of its domain is the same as an element of its range, then there is the relation between them.

Note that this is definitely not the definition we are accustomed to, like e.g. idref 7149 / idrefALT 6118 or df-reflexive 50587 (𝑅Reflexive𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴) ∧ ∀𝑥𝐴𝑥𝑅𝑥)). It turns out that the not-surprising definition which contains 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑟𝑥𝑟𝑥 needs symmetry as well, see refsymrels3 39340. Only when this symmetry condition holds, like in case of equivalence relations, see dfeqvrels3 39363, can we write the traditional form 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑟𝑥𝑟𝑥 for reflexive relations. For the special case with square Cartesian product when the two forms are equivalent see idinxpssinxp4 39016 where (∀𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐴(𝑥 = 𝑦𝑥𝑅𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥𝐴𝑥𝑅𝑥). See also similar definition of the converse reflexive relations class dfcnvrefrel3 39301. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 8-Jul-2019.)

Assertion
Ref Expression
dfrefrel3 ( RefRel 𝑅 ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑅(𝑥 = 𝑦𝑥𝑅𝑦) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦

Proof of Theorem dfrefrel3
StepHypRef Expression
1 dfrefrel2 39285 . 2 ( RefRel 𝑅 ↔ (( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅))
2 idinxpss 39008 . . 3 (( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑅(𝑥 = 𝑦𝑥𝑅𝑦))
32anbi1i 636 . 2 ((( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑅(𝑥 = 𝑦𝑥𝑅𝑦) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
41, 3bitri 278 1 ( RefRel 𝑅 ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑅(𝑥 = 𝑦𝑥𝑅𝑦) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:  wi 4  wb 209  wa 401  wral 3082  cin 3907  wss 3908   class class class wbr 5114   I cid 5560   × cxp 5664  dom cdm 5666  ran crn 5667  Rel wrel 5671   RefRel wrefrel 38879
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-ext 2738  ax-sep 5262  ax-pr 5409
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2745  df-cleq 2758  df-clel 2841  df-ral 3083  df-rex 3093  df-rab 3420  df-v 3460  df-dif 3911  df-un 3913  df-in 3915  df-ss 3925  df-nul 4290  df-if 4493  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-br 5115  df-opab 5179  df-id 5561  df-xp 5672  df-rel 5673  df-cnv 5674  df-dm 5676  df-rn 5677  df-res 5678  df-refrel 39282
This theorem is used by:  refsymrel3  39342
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator