Theorem mdbr 32326

Description: Binary relation expressing ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ is a modular pair. Definition 1.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 1. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mdbr	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵

Proof of Theorem mdbr

Dummy variables 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eleq1 2832	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (𝑦 ∈ Cℋ ↔ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ))
2	1	anbi1d 630	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ((𝑦 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝑧 ∈ Cℋ ) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝑧 ∈ Cℋ )))
3		oveq2 7456	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴))
4	3	ineq1d 4240	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦) ∩ 𝑧) = ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝑧))
5		ineq1 4234	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (𝑦 ∩ 𝑧) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝑧))
6	5	oveq2d 7464	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑧)) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑧)))
7	4, 6	eqeq12d 2756	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦) ∩ 𝑧) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑧)) ↔ ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝑧) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑧))))
8	7	imbi2d 340	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝑧 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦) ∩ 𝑧) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑧))) ↔ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑧 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝑧) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑧)))))
9	8	ralbidv 3184	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑧 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦) ∩ 𝑧) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑧))) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑧 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝑧) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑧)))))
10	2, 9	anbi12d 631	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (((𝑦 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝑧 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑧 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦) ∩ 𝑧) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑧)))) ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝑧 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑧 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝑧) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑧))))))
11		eleq1 2832	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐵 → (𝑧 ∈ Cℋ ↔ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ))
12	11	anbi2d 629	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝑧 ∈ Cℋ ) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ )))
13		sseq2 4035	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐵 → (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵))
14		ineq2 4235	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝑧) = ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵))
15		ineq2 4235	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝑧) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))
16	15	oveq2d 7464	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑧)) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))
17	14, 16	eqeq12d 2756	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐵 → (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝑧) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑧)) ↔ ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))))
18	13, 17	imbi12d 344	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝑧 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝑧) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑧))) ↔ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))))
19	18	ralbidv 3184	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐵 → (∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑧 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝑧) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑧))) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))))
20	12, 19	anbi12d 631	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐵 → (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝑧 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑧 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝑧) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑧)))) ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))))))
21		df-md 32312	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑀ℋ = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑦 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝑧 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑧 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦) ∩ 𝑧) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑧))))}
22	10, 20, 21	brabg 5558	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))))))
23	22	bianabs 541	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2108  ∀wral 3067   ∩ cin 3975   ⊆ wss 3976   class class class wbr 5166  (class class class)co 7448   C_ℋ cch 30961   ∨_ℋ chj 30965   𝑀_ℋ cmd 30998

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-ext 2711  ax-sep 5317  ax-nul 5324  ax-pr 5447

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1778  df-sb 2065  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-ral 3068  df-rab 3444  df-v 3490  df-dif 3979  df-un 3981  df-in 3983  df-ss 3993  df-nul 4353  df-if 4549  df-sn 4649  df-pr 4651  df-op 4655  df-uni 4932  df-br 5167  df-opab 5229  df-iota 6525  df-fv 6581  df-ov 7451  df-md 32312

This theorem is referenced by:  mdi  32327  mdbr2  32328  mdbr3  32329  dmdmd  32332  mddmd2  32341  mdsl1i  32353