Theorem nfdfat 47034

Description: Bound-variable hypothesis builder for "defined at". To prove a deduction version of this theorem is not easily possible because many deduction versions for bound-variable hypothesis builder for constructs the definition of "defined at" is based on are not available (e.g., for Fun/Rel, dom, ⊆, etc.). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nfdfat.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹
nfdfat.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfdfat	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐹 defAt 𝐴

Proof of Theorem nfdfat

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-dfat 47026	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴})))
2		nfdfat.2	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
3		nfdfat.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹
4	3	nfdm 5960	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥dom 𝐹
5	2, 4	nfel 2916	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹
6	2	nfsn 4715	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝐴}
7	3, 6	nfres 5997	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹 ↾ {𝐴})
8	7	nffun 6587	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴})
9	5, 8	nfan 1895	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴}))
10	1, 9	nfxfr 1848	1 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐹 defAt 𝐴

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 395  Ⅎwnf 1778   ∈ wcel 2104  Ⅎwnfc 2886  {csn 4631  dom cdm 5684   ↾ cres 5686  Fun wfun 6553   defAt wdfat 47023

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1790  ax-4 1804  ax-5 1906  ax-6 1963  ax-7 2003  ax-8 2106  ax-9 2114  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2153  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2704

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1538  df-fal 1548  df-ex 1775  df-nf 1779  df-sb 2061  df-clab 2711  df-cleq 2725  df-clel 2812  df-nfc 2888  df-ral 3058  df-rab 3433  df-v 3479  df-dif 3966  df-un 3968  df-in 3970  df-ss 3980  df-nul 4340  df-if 4532  df-sn 4632  df-pr 4634  df-op 4638  df-br 5151  df-opab 5213  df-xp 5690  df-rel 5691  df-cnv 5692  df-co 5693  df-dm 5694  df-res 5696  df-fun 6561  df-dfat 47026

This theorem is referenced by:  nfafv  47043  nfafv2  47125