Theorem nfdfat 46134

Description: Bound-variable hypothesis builder for "defined at". To prove a deduction version of this theorem is not easily possible because many deduction versions for bound-variable hypothesis builder for constructs the definition of "defined at" is based on are not available (e.g., for Fun/Rel, dom, ⊆, etc.). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nfdfat.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹
nfdfat.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfdfat	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐹 defAt 𝐴

Proof of Theorem nfdfat

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-dfat 46126	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴})))
2		nfdfat.2	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
3		nfdfat.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹
4	3	nfdm 5950	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥dom 𝐹
5	2, 4	nfel 2917	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹
6	2	nfsn 4711	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝐴}
7	3, 6	nfres 5983	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹 ↾ {𝐴})
8	7	nffun 6571	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴})
9	5, 8	nfan 1902	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴}))
10	1, 9	nfxfr 1855	1 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐹 defAt 𝐴

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 396  Ⅎwnf 1785   ∈ wcel 2106  Ⅎwnfc 2883  {csn 4628  dom cdm 5676   ↾ cres 5678  Fun wfun 6537   defAt wdfat 46123

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-ext 2703

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 846  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2724  df-clel 2810  df-nfc 2885  df-ral 3062  df-rab 3433  df-v 3476  df-dif 3951  df-un 3953  df-in 3955  df-ss 3965  df-nul 4323  df-if 4529  df-sn 4629  df-pr 4631  df-op 4635  df-br 5149  df-opab 5211  df-xp 5682  df-rel 5683  df-cnv 5684  df-co 5685  df-dm 5686  df-res 5688  df-fun 6545  df-dfat 46126

This theorem is referenced by:  nfafv  46143  nfafv2  46225