Theorem nfdfat 47166

Description: Bound-variable hypothesis builder for "defined at". To prove a deduction version of this theorem is not easily possible because many deduction versions for bound-variable hypothesis builder for constructs the definition of "defined at" is based on are not available (e.g., for Fun/Rel, dom, ⊆, etc.). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nfdfat.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹
nfdfat.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfdfat	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐹 defAt 𝐴

Proof of Theorem nfdfat

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-dfat 47158	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴})))
2		nfdfat.2	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
3		nfdfat.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹
4	3	nfdm 5890	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥dom 𝐹
5	2, 4	nfel 2909	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹
6	2	nfsn 4657	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝐴}
7	3, 6	nfres 5929	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹 ↾ {𝐴})
8	7	nffun 6504	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴})
9	5, 8	nfan 1900	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴}))
10	1, 9	nfxfr 1854	1 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐹 defAt 𝐴

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 395  Ⅎwnf 1784   ∈ wcel 2111  Ⅎwnfc 2879  {csn 4573  dom cdm 5614   ↾ cres 5616  Fun wfun 6475   defAt wdfat 47155

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-10 2144  ax-11 2160  ax-12 2180  ax-ext 2703

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2723  df-clel 2806  df-nfc 2881  df-ral 3048  df-rab 3396  df-v 3438  df-dif 3900  df-un 3902  df-in 3904  df-ss 3914  df-nul 4281  df-if 4473  df-sn 4574  df-pr 4576  df-op 4580  df-br 5090  df-opab 5152  df-xp 5620  df-rel 5621  df-cnv 5622  df-co 5623  df-dm 5624  df-res 5626  df-fun 6483  df-dfat 47158

This theorem is referenced by:  nfafv  47175  nfafv2  47257