Theorem nfdfat 44619

Description: Bound-variable hypothesis builder for "defined at". To prove a deduction version of this theorem is not easily possible because many deduction versions for bound-variable hypothesis builder for constructs the definition of "defined at" is based on are not available (e.g., for Fun/Rel, dom, ⊆, etc.). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nfdfat.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹
nfdfat.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfdfat	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐹 defAt 𝐴

Proof of Theorem nfdfat

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-dfat 44611	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴})))
2		nfdfat.2	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
3		nfdfat.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹
4	3	nfdm 5860	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥dom 𝐹
5	2, 4	nfel 2921	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹
6	2	nfsn 4643	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝐴}
7	3, 6	nfres 5893	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹 ↾ {𝐴})
8	7	nffun 6457	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴})
9	5, 8	nfan 1902	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴}))
10	1, 9	nfxfr 1855	1 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐹 defAt 𝐴

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 396  Ⅎwnf 1786   ∈ wcel 2106  Ⅎwnfc 2887  {csn 4561  dom cdm 5589   ↾ cres 5591  Fun wfun 6427   defAt wdfat 44608

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-ext 2709

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2816  df-nfc 2889  df-ral 3069  df-rab 3073  df-v 3434  df-dif 3890  df-un 3892  df-in 3894  df-ss 3904  df-nul 4257  df-if 4460  df-sn 4562  df-pr 4564  df-op 4568  df-br 5075  df-opab 5137  df-xp 5595  df-rel 5596  df-cnv 5597  df-co 5598  df-dm 5599  df-res 5601  df-fun 6435  df-dfat 44611

This theorem is referenced by:  nfafv  44628  nfafv2  44710