Theorem nfafv 47735

Description: Bound-variable hypothesis builder for function value, analogous to nffv 6879. To prove a deduction version of this analogous to nffvd 6881 is not easily possible because a deduction version of nfdfat 47726 cannot be shown easily. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nfafv.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹
nfafv.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfafv	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹'''𝐴)

Proof of Theorem nfafv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfafv2 47731	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹'''𝐴) = if(𝐹 defAt 𝐴, (𝐹‘𝐴), V)
2		nfafv.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹
3		nfafv.2	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
4	2, 3	nfdfat 47726	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐹 defAt 𝐴
5	2, 3	nffv 6879	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹‘𝐴)
6		nfcv 2926	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥V
7	4, 5, 6	nfif 4513	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥if(𝐹 defAt 𝐴, (𝐹‘𝐴), V)
8	1, 7	nfcxfr 2924	1 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹'''𝐴)

Syntax hints:  Ⅎwnfc 2911  Vcvv 3456  ifcif 4482  ‘cfv 6523   defAt wdfat 47715  '''cafv 47716

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1817  ax-4 1831  ax-5 1932  ax-6 1989  ax-7 2030  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2214  ax-ext 2736  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5258  ax-pr 5392

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-3an 1101  df-tru 1565  df-fal 1575  df-ex 1802  df-nf 1806  df-sb 2093  df-mo 2568  df-eu 2598  df-clab 2743  df-cleq 2756  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3417  df-v 3458  df-sbc 3747  df-csb 3855  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4288  df-if 4483  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-int 4908  df-br 5103  df-opab 5165  df-id 5544  df-xp 5655  df-rel 5656  df-cnv 5657  df-co 5658  df-dm 5659  df-res 5661  df-iota 6479  df-fun 6525  df-fv 6531  df-aiota 47684  df-dfat 47718  df-afv 47719

This theorem is referenced by:  csbafv12g  47736  nfaov  47778