Theorem nfafv 47235

Description: Bound-variable hypothesis builder for function value, analogous to nffv 6832. To prove a deduction version of this analogous to nffvd 6834 is not easily possible because a deduction version of nfdfat 47226 cannot be shown easily. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nfafv.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹
nfafv.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfafv	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹'''𝐴)

Proof of Theorem nfafv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfafv2 47231	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹'''𝐴) = if(𝐹 defAt 𝐴, (𝐹‘𝐴), V)
2		nfafv.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹
3		nfafv.2	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
4	2, 3	nfdfat 47226	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐹 defAt 𝐴
5	2, 3	nffv 6832	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹‘𝐴)
6		nfcv 2894	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥V
7	4, 5, 6	nfif 4503	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥if(𝐹 defAt 𝐴, (𝐹‘𝐴), V)
8	1, 7	nfcxfr 2892	1 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹'''𝐴)

Syntax hints:  Ⅎwnfc 2879  Vcvv 3436  ifcif 4472  ‘cfv 6481   defAt wdfat 47215  '''cafv 47216

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-10 2144  ax-11 2160  ax-12 2180  ax-ext 2703  ax-sep 5232  ax-nul 5242  ax-pr 5368

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2535  df-eu 2564  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2723  df-clel 2806  df-nfc 2881  df-ne 2929  df-ral 3048  df-rex 3057  df-rab 3396  df-v 3438  df-sbc 3737  df-csb 3846  df-dif 3900  df-un 3902  df-in 3904  df-ss 3914  df-nul 4281  df-if 4473  df-sn 4574  df-pr 4576  df-op 4580  df-uni 4857  df-int 4896  df-br 5090  df-opab 5152  df-id 5509  df-xp 5620  df-rel 5621  df-cnv 5622  df-co 5623  df-dm 5624  df-res 5626  df-iota 6437  df-fun 6483  df-fv 6489  df-aiota 47184  df-dfat 47218  df-afv 47219

This theorem is referenced by:  csbafv12g  47236  nfaov  47278