Theorem nfafv 44628

Description: Bound-variable hypothesis builder for function value, analogous to nffv 6784. To prove a deduction version of this analogous to nffvd 6786 is not easily possible because a deduction version of nfdfat 44619 cannot be shown easily. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nfafv.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹
nfafv.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfafv	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹'''𝐴)

Proof of Theorem nfafv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfafv2 44624	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹'''𝐴) = if(𝐹 defAt 𝐴, (𝐹‘𝐴), V)
2		nfafv.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹
3		nfafv.2	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
4	2, 3	nfdfat 44619	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐹 defAt 𝐴
5	2, 3	nffv 6784	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹‘𝐴)
6		nfcv 2907	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥V
7	4, 5, 6	nfif 4489	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥if(𝐹 defAt 𝐴, (𝐹‘𝐴), V)
8	1, 7	nfcxfr 2905	1 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹'''𝐴)

Syntax hints:  Ⅎwnfc 2887  Vcvv 3432  ifcif 4459  ‘cfv 6433   defAt wdfat 44608  '''cafv 44609

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5223  ax-nul 5230  ax-pr 5352

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2816  df-nfc 2889  df-ne 2944  df-ral 3069  df-rex 3070  df-rab 3073  df-v 3434  df-sbc 3717  df-csb 3833  df-dif 3890  df-un 3892  df-in 3894  df-ss 3904  df-nul 4257  df-if 4460  df-sn 4562  df-pr 4564  df-op 4568  df-uni 4840  df-int 4880  df-br 5075  df-opab 5137  df-id 5489  df-xp 5595  df-rel 5596  df-cnv 5597  df-co 5598  df-dm 5599  df-res 5601  df-iota 6391  df-fun 6435  df-fv 6441  df-aiota 44577  df-dfat 44611  df-afv 44612

This theorem is referenced by:  csbafv12g  44629  nfaov  44671