Theorem ordnbtwn 6460

Description: There is no set between an ordinal class and its successor. Generalized Proposition 7.25 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 41. Lemma 1.15 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1998.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 24-Sep-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ordnbtwn	⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴))

Proof of Theorem ordnbtwn

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ordirr 6382	. . 3 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)
2		ordn2lp 6384	. . . 4 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
3		pm2.24 125	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
4		eleq2 2859	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
5	4	biimpac 483	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)
6	5	a1d 26	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐴) → (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
7	3, 6	jaodan 972	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴)) → (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
8	2, 7	syl5com 32	. . 3 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴)) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
9	1, 8	mtod 201	. 2 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴)))
10		elsuci 6434	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴))
11	10	anim2i 628	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴)))
12	9, 11	nsyl 141	1 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400   ∨ wo 860   = wceq 1568   ∈ wcel 2150  Ord word 6363  suc csuc 6366

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1823  ax-4 1837  ax-5 1938  ax-6 1995  ax-7 2036  ax-8 2152  ax-9 2160  ax-ext 2742  ax-sep 5262  ax-pr 5408

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1571  df-fal 1581  df-ex 1808  df-sb 2099  df-clab 2749  df-cleq 2762  df-clel 2845  df-ne 2966  df-ral 3087  df-rex 3097  df-rab 3424  df-v 3464  df-dif 3916  df-un 3918  df-in 3920  df-ss 3930  df-nul 4295  df-if 4493  df-pw 4569  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-uni 4878  df-br 5115  df-opab 5179  df-tr 5224  df-eprel 5565  df-fr 5618  df-we 5620  df-ord 6367  df-suc 6370

This theorem is referenced by:  onnbtwn  6461  ordsucss  7817  ordnexbtwnsuc  43946