Theorem ordnbtwn 6411

Description: There is no set between an ordinal class and its successor. Generalized Proposition 7.25 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 41. Lemma 1.15 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1998.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 24-Sep-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ordnbtwn	⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴))

Proof of Theorem ordnbtwn

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ordirr 6334	. . 3 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)
2		ordn2lp 6336	. . . 4 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
3		pm2.24 124	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
4		eleq2 2824	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
5	4	biimpac 478	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)
6	5	a1d 25	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐴) → (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
7	3, 6	jaodan 960	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴)) → (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
8	2, 7	syl5com 31	. . 3 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴)) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
9	1, 8	mtod 198	. 2 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴)))
10		elsuci 6385	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴))
11	10	anim2i 618	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴)))
12	9, 11	nsyl 140	1 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∨ wo 848   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114  Ord word 6315  suc csuc 6318

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-ext 2707  ax-sep 5240  ax-nul 5250  ax-pr 5376

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2714  df-cleq 2727  df-clel 2810  df-ne 2932  df-ral 3051  df-rex 3060  df-rab 3399  df-v 3441  df-dif 3903  df-un 3905  df-ss 3917  df-nul 4285  df-if 4479  df-pw 4555  df-sn 4580  df-pr 4582  df-op 4586  df-uni 4863  df-br 5098  df-opab 5160  df-tr 5205  df-eprel 5523  df-fr 5576  df-we 5578  df-ord 6319  df-suc 6322

This theorem is referenced by:  onnbtwn  6412  ordsucss  7760  ordnexbtwnsuc  43546