Theorem ordnbtwn 6429

Description: There is no set between an ordinal class and its successor. Generalized Proposition 7.25 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 41. Lemma 1.15 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1998.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 24-Sep-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ordnbtwn	⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴))

Proof of Theorem ordnbtwn

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ordirr 6352	. . 3 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)
2		ordn2lp 6354	. . . 4 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
3		pm2.24 124	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
4		eleq2 2818	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
5	4	biimpac 478	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)
6	5	a1d 25	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐴) → (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
7	3, 6	jaodan 959	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴)) → (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
8	2, 7	syl5com 31	. . 3 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴)) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
9	1, 8	mtod 198	. 2 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴)))
10		elsuci 6403	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴))
11	10	anim2i 617	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴)))
12	9, 11	nsyl 140	1 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∨ wo 847   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109  Ord word 6333  suc csuc 6336

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-ext 2702  ax-sep 5253  ax-nul 5263  ax-pr 5389

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2722  df-clel 2804  df-ne 2927  df-ral 3046  df-rex 3055  df-rab 3409  df-v 3452  df-dif 3919  df-un 3921  df-ss 3933  df-nul 4299  df-if 4491  df-pw 4567  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4874  df-br 5110  df-opab 5172  df-tr 5217  df-eprel 5540  df-fr 5593  df-we 5595  df-ord 6337  df-suc 6340

This theorem is referenced by:  onnbtwn  6430  ordsucss  7795  ordnexbtwnsuc  43249