Theorem ordnbtwn 6458

Description: There is no set between an ordinal class and its successor. Generalized Proposition 7.25 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 41. Lemma 1.15 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1998.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 24-Sep-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ordnbtwn	⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴))

Proof of Theorem ordnbtwn

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ordirr 6383	. . 3 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)
2		ordn2lp 6385	. . . 4 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
3		pm2.24 124	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
4		eleq2 2822	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
5	4	biimpac 478	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)
6	5	a1d 25	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐴) → (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
7	3, 6	jaodan 959	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴)) → (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
8	2, 7	syl5com 31	. . 3 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴)) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
9	1, 8	mtod 198	. 2 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴)))
10		elsuci 6432	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴))
11	10	anim2i 617	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴)))
12	9, 11	nsyl 140	1 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∨ wo 847   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2107  Ord word 6364  suc csuc 6367

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1794  ax-4 1808  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1966  ax-7 2006  ax-8 2109  ax-9 2117  ax-ext 2706  ax-sep 5278  ax-nul 5288  ax-pr 5414

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1779  df-sb 2064  df-clab 2713  df-cleq 2726  df-clel 2808  df-ne 2932  df-ral 3051  df-rex 3060  df-rab 3421  df-v 3466  df-dif 3936  df-un 3938  df-ss 3950  df-nul 4316  df-if 4508  df-pw 4584  df-sn 4609  df-pr 4611  df-op 4615  df-uni 4890  df-br 5126  df-opab 5188  df-tr 5242  df-eprel 5566  df-fr 5619  df-we 5621  df-ord 6368  df-suc 6371

This theorem is referenced by:  onnbtwn  6459  ordsucss  7821  ordnexbtwnsuc  43225