Theorem ordnbtwn 6457

Description: There is no set between an ordinal class and its successor. Generalized Proposition 7.25 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 41. Lemma 1.15 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1998.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 24-Sep-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ordnbtwn	⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴))

Proof of Theorem ordnbtwn

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ordirr 6382	. . 3 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)
2		ordn2lp 6384	. . . 4 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
3		pm2.24 124	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
4		eleq2 2822	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
5	4	biimpac 479	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)
6	5	a1d 25	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐴) → (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
7	3, 6	jaodan 956	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴)) → (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
8	2, 7	syl5com 31	. . 3 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴)) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
9	1, 8	mtod 197	. 2 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴)))
10		elsuci 6431	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴))
11	10	anim2i 617	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴)))
12	9, 11	nsyl 140	1 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 396   ∨ wo 845   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2106  Ord word 6363  suc csuc 6366

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-ext 2703  ax-sep 5299  ax-nul 5306  ax-pr 5427

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 846  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1782  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2724  df-clel 2810  df-ne 2941  df-ral 3062  df-rex 3071  df-rab 3433  df-v 3476  df-dif 3951  df-un 3953  df-in 3955  df-ss 3965  df-nul 4323  df-if 4529  df-pw 4604  df-sn 4629  df-pr 4631  df-op 4635  df-uni 4909  df-br 5149  df-opab 5211  df-tr 5266  df-eprel 5580  df-fr 5631  df-we 5633  df-ord 6367  df-suc 6370

This theorem is referenced by:  onnbtwn  6458  ordsucss  7808  ordnexbtwnsuc  42319