Theorem ordnexbtwnsuc 43856

Description: For any distinct pair of ordinals, if there is no ordinal between the lesser and the greater, the greater is the successor of the lesser. Lemma 1.16 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jan-2025.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ordnexbtwnsuc	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ Ord 𝐵) → (∀𝑐 ∈ On ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐵 = suc 𝐴))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑐   𝐵,𝑐

Proof of Theorem ordnexbtwnsuc

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ordelord 6372	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → Ord 𝐴)
2		ordnbtwn 6445	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴))
3	2	pm2.21d 122	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴) → ∃𝑐 ∈ On (𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵)))
4	3	expd 420	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 → ∃𝑐 ∈ On (𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵))))
5	4	com12 33	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (Ord 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 → ∃𝑐 ∈ On (𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵))))
6	5	adantl 486	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (Ord 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 → ∃𝑐 ∈ On (𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵))))
7	1, 6	mpd 16	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 → ∃𝑐 ∈ On (𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵)))
8		sucidg 6433	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴)
9	8	adantl 486	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴)
10		ordelon 6374	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐴 ∈ On)
11		onsuc 7797	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → suc 𝐴 ∈ On)
12	10, 11	syl 18	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → suc 𝐴 ∈ On)
13		eleq2 2854	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑐 = suc 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴))
14		eleq1 2853	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑐 = suc 𝐴 → (𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ suc 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
15	13, 14	anbi12d 643	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑐 = suc 𝐴 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴 ∧ suc 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)))
16	15	adantl 486	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((Ord 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑐 = suc 𝐴) → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴 ∧ suc 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)))
17	12, 16	rspcedv 3577	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴 ∧ suc 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → ∃𝑐 ∈ On (𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵)))
18	9, 17	mpand 707	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (suc 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ∃𝑐 ∈ On (𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵)))
19	7, 18	jaod 872	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 ∨ suc 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → ∃𝑐 ∈ On (𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵)))
20		ralnex 3091	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑐 ∈ On ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ¬ ∃𝑐 ∈ On (𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵))
21	20	biimpi 219	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑐 ∈ On ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ ∃𝑐 ∈ On (𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵))
22	19, 21	nsyli 158	. . 3 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (∀𝑐 ∈ On ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 ∨ suc 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)))
23		ordsuci 7795	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → Ord suc 𝐴)
24	1, 23	syl 18	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → Ord suc 𝐴)
25		ordtri3 6386	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ Ord suc 𝐴) → (𝐵 = suc 𝐴 ↔ ¬ (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 ∨ suc 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)))
26	24, 25	syldan 602	. . 3 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐵 = suc 𝐴 ↔ ¬ (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 ∨ suc 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)))
27	22, 26	sylibrd 262	. 2 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (∀𝑐 ∈ On ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐵 = suc 𝐴))
28	27	ancoms 463	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ Ord 𝐵) → (∀𝑐 ∈ On ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐵 = suc 𝐴))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   ∨ wo 860   = wceq 1563   ∈ wcel 2145  ∀wral 3079  ∃wrex 3089  Ord word 6349  Oncon0 6350  suc csuc 6352

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1818  ax-4 1832  ax-5 1933  ax-6 1990  ax-7 2031  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-ext 2737  ax-sep 5251  ax-pr 5395  ax-un 7722

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3or 1102  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1566  df-fal 1576  df-ex 1803  df-sb 2094  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-ne 2961  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rab 3418  df-v 3459  df-dif 3910  df-un 3912  df-in 3914  df-ss 3924  df-pss 3927  df-nul 4289  df-if 4484  df-pw 4560  df-sn 4586  df-pr 4588  df-op 4592  df-uni 4869  df-br 5106  df-opab 5168  df-tr 5213  df-eprel 5552  df-po 5560  df-so 5561  df-fr 5605  df-we 5607  df-ord 6353  df-on 6354  df-suc 6356

This theorem is referenced by:  orddif0suc  43857