Theorem ordnexbtwnsuc 43808

Description: For any distinct pair of ordinals, if there is no ordinal between the lesser and the greater, the greater is the successor of the lesser. Lemma 1.16 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jan-2025.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ordnexbtwnsuc	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ Ord 𝐵) → (∀𝑐 ∈ On ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐵 = suc 𝐴))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑐   𝐵,𝑐

Proof of Theorem ordnexbtwnsuc

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ordelord 6364	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → Ord 𝐴)
2		ordnbtwn 6437	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴))
3	2	pm2.21d 121	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴) → ∃𝑐 ∈ On (𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵)))
4	3	expd 419	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 → ∃𝑐 ∈ On (𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵))))
5	4	com12 32	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (Ord 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 → ∃𝑐 ∈ On (𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵))))
6	5	adantl 485	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (Ord 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 → ∃𝑐 ∈ On (𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵))))
7	1, 6	mpd 15	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 → ∃𝑐 ∈ On (𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵)))
8		sucidg 6425	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴)
9	8	adantl 485	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴)
10		ordelon 6366	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐴 ∈ On)
11		onsuc 7789	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → suc 𝐴 ∈ On)
12	10, 11	syl 17	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → suc 𝐴 ∈ On)
13		eleq2 2850	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑐 = suc 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴))
14		eleq1 2849	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑐 = suc 𝐴 → (𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ suc 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
15	13, 14	anbi12d 641	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑐 = suc 𝐴 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴 ∧ suc 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)))
16	15	adantl 485	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((Ord 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑐 = suc 𝐴) → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴 ∧ suc 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)))
17	12, 16	rspcedv 3574	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴 ∧ suc 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → ∃𝑐 ∈ On (𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵)))
18	9, 17	mpand 705	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (suc 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ∃𝑐 ∈ On (𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵)))
19	7, 18	jaod 870	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 ∨ suc 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → ∃𝑐 ∈ On (𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵)))
20		ralnex 3087	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑐 ∈ On ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ¬ ∃𝑐 ∈ On (𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵))
21	20	biimpi 218	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑐 ∈ On ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ ∃𝑐 ∈ On (𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵))
22	19, 21	nsyli 157	. . 3 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (∀𝑐 ∈ On ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 ∨ suc 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)))
23		ordsuci 7787	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → Ord suc 𝐴)
24	1, 23	syl 17	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → Ord suc 𝐴)
25		ordtri3 6378	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ Ord suc 𝐴) → (𝐵 = suc 𝐴 ↔ ¬ (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 ∨ suc 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)))
26	24, 25	syldan 600	. . 3 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐵 = suc 𝐴 ↔ ¬ (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 ∨ suc 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)))
27	22, 26	sylibrd 261	. 2 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (∀𝑐 ∈ On ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐵 = suc 𝐴))
28	27	ancoms 462	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ Ord 𝐵) → (∀𝑐 ∈ On ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐵 = suc 𝐴))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 399   ∨ wo 858   = wceq 1559   ∈ wcel 2141  ∀wral 3075  ∃wrex 3085  Ord word 6341  Oncon0 6342  suc csuc 6344

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1814  ax-4 1828  ax-5 1929  ax-6 1986  ax-7 2027  ax-8 2143  ax-9 2151  ax-ext 2733  ax-sep 5245  ax-pr 5389  ax-un 7714

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-3or 1098  df-3an 1099  df-tru 1562  df-fal 1572  df-ex 1799  df-sb 2090  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3076  df-rex 3086  df-rab 3414  df-v 3455  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-pss 3924  df-nul 4286  df-if 4480  df-pw 4556  df-sn 4582  df-pr 4584  df-op 4588  df-uni 4865  df-br 5100  df-opab 5162  df-tr 5207  df-eprel 5545  df-po 5553  df-so 5554  df-fr 5598  df-we 5600  df-ord 6345  df-on 6346  df-suc 6348

This theorem is referenced by:  orddif0suc  43809