Theorem ttrclresv 33513

Description: The transitive closure of 𝑅 restricted to V is the same as the transitive closure of 𝑅 itself. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Oct-2024.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ttrclresv	⊢ t++(𝑅 ↾ V) = t++𝑅

Proof of Theorem ttrclresv

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑛 𝑎 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fvex 6727	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓‘𝑎) ∈ V
2		fvex 6727	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑓‘suc 𝑎) ∈ V
3	2	brresi 5857	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑓‘𝑎)(𝑅 ↾ V)(𝑓‘suc 𝑎) ↔ ((𝑓‘𝑎) ∈ V ∧ (𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎)))
4	1, 3	mpbiran 709	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑓‘𝑎)(𝑅 ↾ V)(𝑓‘suc 𝑎) ↔ (𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎))
5	4	ralbii 3085	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)(𝑅 ↾ V)(𝑓‘suc 𝑎) ↔ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎))
6	5	3anbi3i 1161	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)(𝑅 ↾ V)(𝑓‘suc 𝑎)) ↔ (𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎)))
7	6	exbii 1855	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)(𝑅 ↾ V)(𝑓‘suc 𝑎)) ↔ ∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎)))
8	7	rexbii 3167	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o)∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)(𝑅 ↾ V)(𝑓‘suc 𝑎)) ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o)∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎)))
9	8	opabbii 5117	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o)∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)(𝑅 ↾ V)(𝑓‘suc 𝑎))} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o)∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎))}
10		df-ttrcl 33504	. 2 ⊢ t++(𝑅 ↾ V) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o)∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)(𝑅 ↾ V)(𝑓‘suc 𝑎))}
11		df-ttrcl 33504	. 2 ⊢ t++𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o)∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎))}
12	9, 10, 11	3eqtr4i 2775	1 ⊢ t++(𝑅 ↾ V) = t++𝑅

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 399   ∧ w3a 1089   = wceq 1543  ∃wex 1787   ∈ wcel 2110  ∀wral 3058  ∃wrex 3059  Vcvv 3405   ∖ cdif 3860  ∅c0 4234   class class class wbr 5050  {copab 5112   ↾ cres 5550  suc csuc 6212   Fn wfn 6372  ‘cfv 6377  ωcom 7641  1_oc1o 8192  t++cttrcl 33503

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1803  ax-4 1817  ax-5 1918  ax-6 1976  ax-7 2016  ax-8 2112  ax-9 2120  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2708  ax-sep 5189  ax-nul 5196  ax-pr 5319

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 848  df-3an 1091  df-tru 1546  df-fal 1556  df-ex 1788  df-nf 1792  df-sb 2071  df-mo 2539  df-eu 2568  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2816  df-ral 3063  df-rex 3064  df-rab 3067  df-v 3407  df-dif 3866  df-un 3868  df-in 3870  df-ss 3880  df-nul 4235  df-if 4437  df-sn 4539  df-pr 4541  df-op 4545  df-uni 4817  df-br 5051  df-opab 5113  df-xp 5554  df-res 5560  df-iota 6335  df-fv 6385  df-ttrcl 33504

This theorem is referenced by:  ttrclco  33514  cottrcl  33515  dmttrcl  33517  rnttrcl  33518