Theorem ttrclresv 33703

Description: The transitive closure of 𝑅 restricted to V is the same as the transitive closure of 𝑅 itself. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Oct-2024.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ttrclresv	⊢ t++(𝑅 ↾ V) = t++𝑅

Proof of Theorem ttrclresv

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑛 𝑎 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fvex 6769	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓‘𝑎) ∈ V
2		fvex 6769	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑓‘suc 𝑎) ∈ V
3	2	brresi 5889	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑓‘𝑎)(𝑅 ↾ V)(𝑓‘suc 𝑎) ↔ ((𝑓‘𝑎) ∈ V ∧ (𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎)))
4	1, 3	mpbiran 705	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑓‘𝑎)(𝑅 ↾ V)(𝑓‘suc 𝑎) ↔ (𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎))
5	4	ralbii 3090	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)(𝑅 ↾ V)(𝑓‘suc 𝑎) ↔ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎))
6	5	3anbi3i 1157	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)(𝑅 ↾ V)(𝑓‘suc 𝑎)) ↔ (𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎)))
7	6	exbii 1851	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)(𝑅 ↾ V)(𝑓‘suc 𝑎)) ↔ ∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎)))
8	7	rexbii 3177	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o)∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)(𝑅 ↾ V)(𝑓‘suc 𝑎)) ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o)∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎)))
9	8	opabbii 5137	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o)∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)(𝑅 ↾ V)(𝑓‘suc 𝑎))} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o)∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎))}
10		df-ttrcl 33694	. 2 ⊢ t++(𝑅 ↾ V) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o)∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)(𝑅 ↾ V)(𝑓‘suc 𝑎))}
11		df-ttrcl 33694	. 2 ⊢ t++𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o)∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎))}
12	9, 10, 11	3eqtr4i 2776	1 ⊢ t++(𝑅 ↾ V) = t++𝑅

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1085   = wceq 1539  ∃wex 1783   ∈ wcel 2108  ∀wral 3063  ∃wrex 3064  Vcvv 3422   ∖ cdif 3880  ∅c0 4253   class class class wbr 5070  {copab 5132   ↾ cres 5582  suc csuc 6253   Fn wfn 6413  ‘cfv 6418  ωcom 7687  1_oc1o 8260  t++cttrcl 33693

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5218  ax-nul 5225  ax-pr 5347

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1784  df-nf 1788  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3069  df-rab 3072  df-v 3424  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-nul 4254  df-if 4457  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561  df-op 4565  df-uni 4837  df-br 5071  df-opab 5133  df-xp 5586  df-res 5592  df-iota 6376  df-fv 6426  df-ttrcl 33694

This theorem is referenced by:  ttrclco  33704  cottrcl  33705  dmttrcl  33707  rnttrcl  33708