P. 98 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 9701-9800   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	tc00 9701	The transitive closure is empty iff its argument is. Proof suggested by Gérard Lang. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ((TC‘𝐴) = ∅ ↔ 𝐴 = ∅))
2.6.6  Well-Founded Induction
Theorem	frmin 9702*	Every (possibly proper) subclass of a class 𝐴 with a well-founded set-like relation 𝑅 has a minimal element. This is a very strong generalization of tz6.26 6320 and tz7.5 6353. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 27-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅)) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 Pred(𝑅, 𝐵, 𝑦) = ∅)
Theorem	frind 9703*	A subclass of a well-founded class 𝐴 with the property that whenever it contains all predecessors of an element of 𝐴 it also contains that element, is equal to 𝐴. Compare wfi 6322 and tfi 7829, which are special cases of this theorem that do not require the axiom of infinity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	frinsg 9704*	Well-Founded Induction Schema. If a property passes from all elements less than 𝑦 of a well-founded class 𝐴 to 𝑦 itself (induction hypothesis), then the property holds for all elements of 𝐴. Theorem 5.6(ii) of [Levy] p. 64. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑 → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	frins 9705*	Well-Founded Induction Schema. If a property passes from all elements less than 𝑦 of a well-founded class 𝐴 to 𝑦 itself (induction hypothesis), then the property holds for all elements of 𝐴. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑅 Fr 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝑅 Se 𝐴    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑 → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)
Theorem	frins2f 9706*	Well-Founded Induction schema, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)𝜓 → 𝜑))    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	frins2 9707*	Well-Founded Induction schema, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)𝜓 → 𝜑))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	frins3 9708*	Well-Founded Induction schema, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)𝜓 → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜒)
2.6.7  Well-Founded Recursion
Theorem	frr3g 9709*	Functions defined by well-founded recursion are identical up to relation, domain, and characteristic function. General version of frr3 9714. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝑦𝐻(𝐹 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)))) ∧ (𝐺 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐺‘𝑦) = (𝑦𝐻(𝐺 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))) → 𝐹 = 𝐺)
Theorem	frrlem15 9710*	Lemma for general well-founded recursion. Two acceptable functions are compatible. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑦𝐺(𝑓 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑥𝑔𝑢 ∧ 𝑥ℎ𝑣) → 𝑢 = 𝑣))
Theorem	frrlem16 9711*	Lemma for general well-founded recursion. Establish a subset relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Sep-2023.) Revised notion of transitive closure. (Revised by Scott Fenton, 1-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → ∀𝑤 ∈ Pred (t++(𝑅 ↾ 𝐴), 𝐴, 𝑧)Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤) ⊆ Pred(t++(𝑅 ↾ 𝐴), 𝐴, 𝑧))
Theorem	frr1 9712	Law of general well-founded recursion, part one. This theorem and the following two drop the partial order requirement from fpr1 8282, fpr2 8283, and fpr3 8284, which requires using the axiom of infinity (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 𝐹 = frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)
Theorem	frr2 9713	Law of general well-founded recursion, part two. Now we establish the value of 𝐹 within 𝐴. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 𝐹 = frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = (𝑋𝐺(𝐹 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋))))
Theorem	frr3 9714*	Law of general well-founded recursion, part three. Finally, we show that 𝐹 is unique. We do this by showing that any function 𝐻 with the same properties we proved of 𝐹 in frr1 9712 and frr2 9713 is identical to 𝐹. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 𝐹 = frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑧) = (𝑧𝐺(𝐻 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑧))))) → 𝐹 = 𝐻)
2.6.8  Rank
Syntax	cr1 9715	Extend class definition to include the cumulative hierarchy of sets function.
class 𝑅1
Syntax	crnk 9716	Extend class definition to include rank function.
class rank
Definition	df-r1 9717	Define the cumulative hierarchy of sets function, using Takeuti and Zaring's notation (𝑅1). Starting with the empty set, this function builds up layers of sets where the next layer is the power set of the previous layer (and the union of previous layers when the argument is a limit ordinal). Using the Axiom of Regularity, we can show that any set whatsoever belongs to one of the layers of this hierarchy (see tz9.13 9744). Our definition expresses Definition 9.9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 76 in a closed form, from which we derive the recursive definition as Theorems r10 9721, r1suc 9723, and r1lim 9725. Theorem r1val1 9739 shows a recursive definition that works for all values, and Theorems r1val2 9790 and r1val3 9791 show the value expressed in terms of rank. Other notations for this function are R with the argument as a subscript (Equation 3.1 of [BellMachover] p. 477), V with a subscript (Definition of [Enderton] p. 202), M with a subscript (Definition 15.19 of [Monk1] p. 113), the capital Greek letter psi (Definition of [Mendelson] p. 281), and bold-face R (Definition 2.1 of [Kunen] p. 95). (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-2003.)
⊢ 𝑅1 = rec((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ 𝒫 𝑥), ∅)
Definition	df-rank 9718*	Define the rank function. See rankval 9769, rankval2 9771, rankval3 9793, or rankval4 9820 its value. The rank is a kind of "inverse" of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function 𝑅1: given a set, it returns an ordinal number telling us the smallest layer of the hierarchy to which the set belongs. Based on Definition 9.14 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 79. Theorem rankid 9786 illustrates the "inverse" concept. Another nice theorem showing the relationship is rankr1a 9789. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2003.)
⊢ rank = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ ∩ {𝑦 ∈ On ∣ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑅1‘suc 𝑦)})
Theorem	r1funlim 9719	The cumulative hierarchy of sets function is a function on a limit ordinal. (This weak form of r1fnon 9720 avoids ax-rep 5234.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (Fun 𝑅1 ∧ Lim dom 𝑅1)
Theorem	r1fnon 9720	The cumulative hierarchy of sets function is a function on the class of ordinal numbers. (Contributed by NM, 5-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 𝑅1 Fn On
Theorem	r10 9721	Value of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function at ∅. Part of Definition 9.9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 76. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (𝑅1‘∅) = ∅
Theorem	r1sucg 9722	Value of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function at a successor ordinal. Part of Definition 9.9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 76. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅1 → (𝑅1‘suc 𝐴) = 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝐴))
Theorem	r1suc 9723	Value of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function at a successor ordinal. Part of Definition 9.9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 76. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝑅1‘suc 𝐴) = 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝐴))
Theorem	r1limg 9724*	Value of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function at a limit ordinal. Part of Definition 9.9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 76. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅1 ∧ Lim 𝐴) → (𝑅1‘𝐴) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑅1‘𝑥))
Theorem	r1lim 9725*	Value of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function at a limit ordinal. Part of Definition 9.9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 76. (Contributed by NM, 4-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ Lim 𝐴) → (𝑅1‘𝐴) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑅1‘𝑥))
Theorem	r1fin 9726	The first ω levels of the cumulative hierarchy are all finite. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝑅1‘𝐴) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	r1sdom 9727	Each stage in the cumulative hierarchy is strictly larger than the last. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑅1‘𝐵) ≺ (𝑅1‘𝐴))
Theorem	r111 9728	The cumulative hierarchy is a one-to-one function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝑅1:On–1-1→V
Theorem	r1tr 9729	The cumulative hierarchy of sets is transitive. Lemma 7T of [Enderton] p. 202. (Contributed by NM, 8-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ Tr (𝑅1‘𝐴)
Theorem	r1tr2 9730	The union of a cumulative hierarchy of sets at ordinal 𝐴 is a subset of the hierarchy at 𝐴. JFM CLASSES1 th. 40. (Contributed by FL, 20-Apr-2011.)
⊢ ∪ (𝑅1‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝑅1‘𝐴)
Theorem	r1ordg 9731	Ordering relation for the cumulative hierarchy of sets. Part of Proposition 9.10(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 77. (Contributed by NM, 8-Sep-2003.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝑅1‘𝐴) ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵)))
Theorem	r1ord3g 9732	Ordering relation for the cumulative hierarchy of sets. Part of Theorem 3.3(i) of [BellMachover] p. 478. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2003.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅1 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑅1‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝑅1‘𝐵)))
Theorem	r1ord 9733	Ordering relation for the cumulative hierarchy of sets. Part of Proposition 9.10(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 77. (Contributed by NM, 8-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝑅1‘𝐴) ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵)))
Theorem	r1ord2 9734	Ordering relation for the cumulative hierarchy of sets. Part of Proposition 9.10(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 77. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2003.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝑅1‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝑅1‘𝐵)))
Theorem	r1ord3 9735	Ordering relation for the cumulative hierarchy of sets. Part of Theorem 3.3(i) of [BellMachover] p. 478. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2003.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑅1‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝑅1‘𝐵)))
Theorem	r1sssuc 9736	The value of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function is a subset of its value at the successor. JFM CLASSES1 Th. 39. (Contributed by FL, 20-Apr-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝑅1‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝑅1‘suc 𝐴))
Theorem	r1pwss 9737	Each set of the cumulative hierarchy is closed under subsets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ (𝑅1‘𝐵))
Theorem	r1sscl 9738	Each set of the cumulative hierarchy is closed under subsets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵))
Theorem	r1val1 9739*	The value of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function expressed recursively. Theorem 7Q of [Enderton] p. 202. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅1 → (𝑅1‘𝐴) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝑥))
Theorem	tz9.12lem1 9740*	Lemma for tz9.12 9743. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑧 ∈ V ↦ ∩ {𝑣 ∈ On ∣ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝑣)})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 “ 𝐴) ⊆ On
Theorem	tz9.12lem2 9741*	Lemma for tz9.12 9743. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2003.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑧 ∈ V ↦ ∩ {𝑣 ∈ On ∣ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝑣)})    ⇒   ⊢ suc ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∈ On
Theorem	tz9.12lem3 9742*	Lemma for tz9.12 9743. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑧 ∈ V ↦ ∩ {𝑣 ∈ On ∣ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝑣)})    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝑦) → 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘suc suc ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝐴)))
Theorem	tz9.12 9743*	A set is well-founded if all of its elements are well-founded. Proposition 9.12 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 78. The main proof consists of tz9.12lem1 9740 through tz9.12lem3 9742. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2003.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝑦) → ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝑦))
Theorem	tz9.13 9744*	Every set is well-founded, assuming the Axiom of Regularity. In other words, every set belongs to a layer of the cumulative hierarchy of sets. Proposition 9.13 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 78. (Contributed by NM, 23-Sep-2003.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝑥)
Theorem	tz9.13g 9745*	Every set is well-founded, assuming the Axiom of Regularity. Proposition 9.13 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 78. This variant of tz9.13 9744 expresses the class existence requirement as an antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 4-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝑥))
Theorem	rankwflemb 9746*	Two ways of saying a set is well-founded. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘suc 𝑥))
Theorem	rankf 9747	The domain and codomain of the rank function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2013.)
⊢ rank:∪ (𝑅1 “ On)⟶On
Theorem	rankon 9748	The rank of a set is an ordinal number. Proposition 9.15(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 79. (Contributed by NM, 5-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (rank‘𝐴) ∈ On
Theorem	r1elwf 9749	Any member of the cumulative hierarchy is well-founded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → 𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
Theorem	rankvalb 9750*	Value of the rank function. Definition 9.14 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 79 (proved as a theorem from our definition). This variant of rankval 9769 does not use Regularity, and so requires the assumption that 𝐴 is in the range of 𝑅1. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → (rank‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘suc 𝑥)})
Theorem	rankr1ai 9751	One direction of rankr1a 9789. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → (rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	rankvaln 9752	Value of the rank function at a non-well-founded set. (The antecedent is always false under Foundation, by unir1 9766, unless 𝐴 is a proper class.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → (rank‘𝐴) = ∅)
Theorem	rankidb 9753	Identity law for the rank function. (Contributed by NM, 3-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Mar-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘suc (rank‘𝐴)))
Theorem	rankdmr1 9754	A rank is a member of the cumulative hierarchy. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (rank‘𝐴) ∈ dom 𝑅1
Theorem	rankr1ag 9755	A version of rankr1a 9789 that is suitable without assuming Regularity or Replacement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jun-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ (rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	rankr1bg 9756	A relationship between rank and 𝑅1. See rankr1ag 9755 for the membership version. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1) → (𝐴 ⊆ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ (rank‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	r1rankidb 9757	Any set is a subset of the hierarchy of its rank. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jun-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝑅1‘(rank‘𝐴)))
Theorem	r1elssi 9758	The range of the 𝑅1 function is transitive. Lemma 2.10 of [Kunen] p. 97. One direction of r1elss 9759 that doesn't need 𝐴 to be a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
Theorem	r1elss 9759	The range of the 𝑅1 function is transitive. Lemma 2.10 of [Kunen] p. 97. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
Theorem	pwwf 9760	A power set is well-founded iff the base set is. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jun-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
Theorem	sswf 9761	A subset of a well-founded set is well-founded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
Theorem	snwf 9762	A singleton is well-founded if its element is. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jun-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → {𝐴} ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
Theorem	unwf 9763	A binary union is well-founded iff its elements are. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jun-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)) ↔ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
Theorem	prwf 9764	An unordered pair is well-founded if its elements are. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jun-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)) → {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
Theorem	opwf 9765	An ordered pair is well-founded if its elements are. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)) → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
Theorem	unir1 9766	The cumulative hierarchy of sets covers the universe. Proposition 4.45 (b) to (a) of [Mendelson] p. 281. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) = V
Theorem	jech9.3 9767	Every set belongs to some value of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function 𝑅1, i.e. the indexed union of all values of 𝑅1 is the universe. Lemma 9.3 of [Jech] p. 71. (Contributed by NM, 4-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ On (𝑅1‘𝑥) = V
Theorem	rankwflem 9768*	Every set is well-founded, assuming the Axiom of Regularity. Proposition 9.13 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 78. This variant of tz9.13g 9745 is useful in proofs of theorems about the rank function. (Contributed by NM, 4-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘suc 𝑥))
Theorem	rankval 9769*	Value of the rank function. Definition 9.14 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 79 (proved as a theorem from our definition). (Contributed by NM, 24-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (rank‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘suc 𝑥)}
Theorem	rankvalg 9770*	Value of the rank function. Definition 9.14 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 79 (proved as a theorem from our definition). This variant of rankval 9769 expresses the class existence requirement as an antecedent instead of a hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 5-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (rank‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘suc 𝑥)})
Theorem	rankval2 9771*	Value of an alternate definition of the rank function. Definition of [BellMachover] p. 478. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (rank‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝐴 ⊆ (𝑅1‘𝑥)})
Theorem	uniwf 9772	A union is well-founded iff the base set is. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jun-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ↔ ∪ 𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
Theorem	rankr1clem 9773	Lemma for rankr1c 9774. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1) → (¬ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐵 ⊆ (rank‘𝐴)))
Theorem	rankr1c 9774	A relationship between the rank function and the cumulative hierarchy of sets function 𝑅1. Proposition 9.15(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 79. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → (𝐵 = (rank‘𝐴) ↔ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘suc 𝐵))))
Theorem	rankidn 9775	A relationship between the rank function and the cumulative hierarchy of sets function 𝑅1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘(rank‘𝐴)))
Theorem	rankpwi 9776	The rank of a power set. Part of Exercise 30 of [Enderton] p. 207. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → (rank‘𝒫 𝐴) = suc (rank‘𝐴))
Theorem	rankelb 9777	The membership relation is inherited by the rank function. Proposition 9.16 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 79. (Contributed by NM, 4-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (rank‘𝐴) ∈ (rank‘𝐵)))
Theorem	wfelirr 9778	A well-founded set is not a member of itself. This proof does not require the axiom of regularity, unlike elirr 9550. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	rankval3b 9779*	The value of the rank function expressed recursively: the rank of a set is the smallest ordinal number containing the ranks of all members of the set. Proposition 9.17 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 79. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → (rank‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑥})
Theorem	ranksnb 9780	The rank of a singleton. Theorem 15.17(v) of [Monk1] p. 112. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → (rank‘{𝐴}) = suc (rank‘𝐴))
Theorem	rankonidlem 9781	Lemma for rankonid 9782. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Mar-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅1 → (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ (rank‘𝐴) = 𝐴))
Theorem	rankonid 9782	The rank of an ordinal number is itself. Proposition 9.18 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 79 and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅1 ↔ (rank‘𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	onwf 9783	The ordinals are all well-founded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ On ⊆ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)
Theorem	onssr1 9784	Initial segments of the ordinals are contained in initial segments of the cumulative hierarchy. (Contributed by FL, 20-Apr-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅1 → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝑅1‘𝐴))
Theorem	rankr1g 9785	A relationship between the rank function and the cumulative hierarchy of sets function 𝑅1. Proposition 9.15(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 79. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 = (rank‘𝐴) ↔ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘suc 𝐵))))
Theorem	rankid 9786	Identity law for the rank function. (Contributed by NM, 3-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘suc (rank‘𝐴))
Theorem	rankr1 9787	A relationship between the rank function and the cumulative hierarchy of sets function 𝑅1. Proposition 9.15(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 79. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 = (rank‘𝐴) ↔ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘suc 𝐵)))
Theorem	ssrankr1 9788	A relationship between an ordinal number less than or equal to a rank, and the cumulative hierarchy of sets 𝑅1. Proposition 9.15(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 79. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (𝐵 ⊆ (rank‘𝐴) ↔ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵)))
Theorem	rankr1a 9789	A relationship between rank and 𝑅1, clearly equivalent to ssrankr1 9788 and friends through trichotomy, but in Raph's opinion considerably more intuitive. See rankr1b 9817 for the subset version. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 29-May-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ (rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	r1val2 9790*	The value of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function expressed in terms of rank. Definition 15.19 of [Monk1] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝑅1‘𝐴) = {𝑥 ∣ (rank‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴})
Theorem	r1val3 9791*	The value of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function expressed in terms of rank. Theorem 15.18 of [Monk1] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝑅1‘𝐴) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝒫 {𝑦 ∣ (rank‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑥})
Theorem	rankel 9792	The membership relation is inherited by the rank function. Proposition 9.16 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 79. (Contributed by NM, 4-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (rank‘𝐴) ∈ (rank‘𝐵))
Theorem	rankval3 9793*	The value of the rank function expressed recursively: the rank of a set is the smallest ordinal number containing the ranks of all members of the set. Proposition 9.17 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 79. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (rank‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑥}
Theorem	bndrank 9794*	Any class whose elements have bounded rank is a set. Proposition 9.19 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 80. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑦) ⊆ 𝑥 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	unbndrank 9795*	The elements of a proper class have unbounded rank. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 80. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ (rank‘𝑦))
Theorem	rankpw 9796	The rank of a power set. Part of Exercise 30 of [Enderton] p. 207. (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (rank‘𝒫 𝐴) = suc (rank‘𝐴)
Theorem	ranklim 9797	The rank of a set belongs to a limit ordinal iff the rank of its power set does. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2006.)
⊢ (Lim 𝐵 → ((rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ↔ (rank‘𝒫 𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	r1pw 9798	A stronger property of 𝑅1 than rankpw 9796. The latter merely proves that 𝑅1 of the successor is a power set, but here we prove that if 𝐴 is in the cumulative hierarchy, then 𝒫 𝐴 is in the cumulative hierarchy of the successor. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 29-May-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘suc 𝐵)))
Theorem	r1pwALT 9799	Alternate shorter proof of r1pw 9798 based on the additional axioms ax-reg 9545 and ax-inf2 9594. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 29-May-2004.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘suc 𝐵)))
Theorem	r1pwcl 9800	The cumulative hierarchy of a limit ordinal is closed under power set. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 29-May-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (Lim 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵)))