Users' Mathboxes Mathbox for Scott Fenton < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >   Mathboxes  >  wlimeq12 Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem wlimeq12 36399
Description: Equality theorem for the limit class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jun-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Oct-2021.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
wlimeq12 ((𝑅 = 𝑆𝐴 = 𝐵) → WLim(𝑅, 𝐴) = WLim(𝑆, 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem wlimeq12
Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 simpr 490 . . 3 ((𝑅 = 𝑆𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
2 simpl 488 . . . . . 6 ((𝑅 = 𝑆𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝑅 = 𝑆)
31, 1, 2infeq123d 9455 . . . . 5 ((𝑅 = 𝑆𝐴 = 𝐵) → inf(𝐴, 𝐴, 𝑅) = inf(𝐵, 𝐵, 𝑆))
43neeq2d 3015 . . . 4 ((𝑅 = 𝑆𝐴 = 𝐵) → (𝑥 ≠ inf(𝐴, 𝐴, 𝑅) ↔ 𝑥 ≠ inf(𝐵, 𝐵, 𝑆)))
5 equid 2045 . . . . . . 7 𝑥 = 𝑥
6 predeq123 6300 . . . . . . 7 ((𝑅 = 𝑆𝐴 = 𝐵𝑥 = 𝑥) → Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑥) = Pred(𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑥))
75, 6mp3an3 1479 . . . . . 6 ((𝑅 = 𝑆𝐴 = 𝐵) → Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑥) = Pred(𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑥))
87, 1, 2supeq123d 9423 . . . . 5 ((𝑅 = 𝑆𝐴 = 𝐵) → sup(Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑥), 𝐴, 𝑅) = sup(Pred(𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑥), 𝐵, 𝑆))
98eqeq2d 2771 . . . 4 ((𝑅 = 𝑆𝐴 = 𝐵) → (𝑥 = sup(Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑥), 𝐴, 𝑅) ↔ 𝑥 = sup(Pred(𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑥), 𝐵, 𝑆)))
104, 9anbi12d 644 . . 3 ((𝑅 = 𝑆𝐴 = 𝐵) → ((𝑥 ≠ inf(𝐴, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑥 = sup(Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑥), 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ (𝑥 ≠ inf(𝐵, 𝐵, 𝑆) ∧ 𝑥 = sup(Pred(𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑥), 𝐵, 𝑆))))
111, 10rabeqbidv 3429 . 2 ((𝑅 = 𝑆𝐴 = 𝐵) → {𝑥𝐴 ∣ (𝑥 ≠ inf(𝐴, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑥 = sup(Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑥), 𝐴, 𝑅))} = {𝑥𝐵 ∣ (𝑥 ≠ inf(𝐵, 𝐵, 𝑆) ∧ 𝑥 = sup(Pred(𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑥), 𝐵, 𝑆))})
12 df-wlim 36393 . 2 WLim(𝑅, 𝐴) = {𝑥𝐴 ∣ (𝑥 ≠ inf(𝐴, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑥 = sup(Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑥), 𝐴, 𝑅))}
13 df-wlim 36393 . 2 WLim(𝑆, 𝐵) = {𝑥𝐵 ∣ (𝑥 ≠ inf(𝐵, 𝐵, 𝑆) ∧ 𝑥 = sup(Pred(𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑥), 𝐵, 𝑆))}
1411, 12, 133eqtr4g 2820 1 ((𝑅 = 𝑆𝐴 = 𝐵) → WLim(𝑅, 𝐴) = WLim(𝑆, 𝐵))
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:  wi 4  wa 401   = wceq 1570  wne 2955  {crab 3412  Predcpred 6298  supcsup 9413  infcinf 9414  WLimcwlim 36391
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-ext 2732
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-xp 5661  df-cnv 5663  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-pred 6299  df-sup 9415  df-inf 9416  df-wlim 36393
This theorem is used by:  wlimeq1  36400  wlimeq2  36401
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator